Display options
Share it on

Emerg Med Australas. 2022 Jan 01; doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13929. Epub 2022 Jan 01.

Retrospective study of the prevalence and characteristics of adverse drug events in adults who present to an Australian emergency department.

Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA

Nathan J Brown, Elizabeth Doran, Jaimi H Greenslade, Bill Lukin, Neil Cottrell, Fabian Jaramillo, Ian Coombes, Peter Donovan, Louise Cullen

Affiliations

  1. Emergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  2. Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  3. School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  4. Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI), Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  5. Brisbane North PHN/Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  6. Pharmacy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  7. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

PMID: 34973155 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.13929

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the burden, on the ED, of harm from unintentional adverse drug events (ADEs) in the community.

METHODS: A retrospective, observational study of 936 randomly selected presentations to a level 6 ED at a principal referral hospital in Brisbane, Australia, in November 2017. Clinical records were screened by a pharmacist, who identified suspected ADEs. All suspected ADEs and a random selection of presentations without ADEs were reviewed by an expert panel, which classified, by consensus: occurrence and type of ADE, contribution of ADE to presentation, severity of harm and preventability of presentation. Medication-related ED presentations (ADE-Ps) and potential ADEs were, respectively, defined as presentations directly attributable to an ADE, and medication events that occurred but did not cause the ED presentation. Descriptive data analysis was performed.

RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) age of patients was 40 (27-58) years, with 49.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 46.5-52.9) being male. The prevalences of ADE-Ps and potential ADEs were 9.2% (95% CI 7.5-11.3) and 5.0% (95% CI 3.8-6.6), respectively. The severity of harm was classified as 'death or likely permanent harm' in 4.7% (95% CI 0.2-9.1) of ADE-Ps, 'temporary harm' (89.5%, 95% CI 83.1-96.0) and 'minimal or no harm' (5.8%, 95% CI 0.9-10.8). Most (79.1%, 95% CI 70.5-87.7) ADE-Ps were preventable.

CONCLUSIONS: There is a high burden on emergency care because of unintended medication harm in the community. Interventions to reduce such harm are likely to require a co-ordinated primary, acute and public healthcare response. The high proportion of presentations with potential ADEs indicates opportunity for harm mitigation in the ED.

© 2022 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine.

Keywords: adult; drug-related side effects and adverse reaction; emergency service, hospital; prevalence; retrospective study

References

  1. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events: implications for prevention. JAMA 1995; 274: 29-34. - PubMed
  2. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). Second National Report on Patient Safety: Improving Medication Safety. Sydney: ACSQHC, 2002. - PubMed
  3. Pharmaceutical Society of Australia. Medication Safety: Take Care. Canberra: PSA, 2019. - PubMed
  4. Hendrie J, Sammartino L, Silvapulle MJ, Braitberg G. Experience in adverse events detection in an emergency department: incidence and outcome of events. Emerg. Med. Australas. 2007; 19: 16-24. - PubMed
  5. Hendrie J, Sammartino L, Silvapulle MJ, Braitberg G. Experience in adverse events detection in an emergency department: nature of events. Emerg. Med. Australas. 2007; 19: 9-15. - PubMed
  6. Taylor SE, Mitri EA, Harding AM et al. Comprehensive identification of medication-related problems occurring prior to, during and after emergency department presentation: an Australian multicentre, prospective, observational study. Emerg. Med. Australas. 2020; 32: 457-65. - PubMed
  7. Shehab N, Lovegrove MC, Geller AI, Rose KO, Weidle NJ, Budnitz DS. US emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events, 2013-2014. JAMA 2016; 316: 2115-25. - PubMed
  8. Kessler C, Ward MJ, McNaughton CD. Reducing adverse drug events: the need to rethink outpatient prescribing. JAMA 2016; 316: 2092-3. - PubMed
  9. Baena MI, Fajardo PC, Pintor-Marmol A et al. Negative clinical outcomes of medication resulting in emergency department visits. Eur. J. Clin. Phamacol. 2014; 70: 79-87. - PubMed
  10. Zed PJ, Abu-Laban RB, Balen RM et al. Incidence, severity and preventability of medication-related visits to the emergency department: a prospective study. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2008; 178: 1563-9. - PubMed
  11. Gallagher P, Ryan C, Byrne S, Kennedy J, O'Mahony D. STOPP (screening tool of older person's prescriptions) and START (screening tool to alert doctors to right treatment). Consensus validation. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008; 46: 72-83. - PubMed
  12. Stowasser DA, Collins DM, Stowasser M. A randomised controlled trial of medication liaison services-patient outcomes. J. Pharm. Pract. Res. 2002; 32: 133-40. - PubMed
  13. Easton K, Morgan T, Williamson M. Medication Safety in the Community: A Review of the Literature. Sydney: National Prescribing Service, 2009. - PubMed
  14. Hepler CD, Strand LM. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1990; 47: 533-43. - PubMed
  15. Paradissis C, Coombes ID, Donovan P, Doran E, McKean M, Barras MA. The type and incidence of adverse drug events in ageing medical inpatients and their effect on length of hospital stay. J. Pharm. Pract. Res. 2017; 47: 347-54. - PubMed
  16. Parameswaran Nair N, Chalmers L, Bereznicki BJ et al. Adverse drug reaction-related hospitalizations in elderly Australians: a prospective cross-sectional study in two Tasmanian hospitals. Drug Saf. 2017; 40: 597-606. - PubMed
  17. Phillips AL, Nigro O, Macolino KA et al. Hospital admissions caused by adverse drug events: an Australian prospective study. Aust. Health Rev. 2014; 38: 51-7. - PubMed
  18. Alagiakrishnan K, Wilson P, Sadowski CA et al. Physicians' use of computerized clinical decision supports to improve medication management in the elderly - the Seniors Medication Alert and Review Technology intervention. Clin. Interv. Aging 2016; 11: 73-81. - PubMed
  19. Chen TF. Pharmacist-led home medicines review and residential medication management review: the Australian model. Drugs Aging 2016; 33: 199-204. - PubMed
  20. Department of Health. Medication management reviews. Australian Government. [Cited 20 Jul 2020.] Available from URL: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/medication_management_reviews.htm - PubMed
  21. Assiri GA, Shebl NA, Mahmoud MA et al. What is the epidemiology of medication errors, error-related adverse events and risk factors for errors in adults managed in community care contexts? A systematic review of the international literature. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e019101-e. - PubMed
  22. Zhou L, Rupa AP. Categorization and association analysis of risk factors for adverse drug events. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018; 74: 389-404. - PubMed
  23. Clinical Excellence Commission. High-Risk Medicines Management Policy. Sydney: Ministry of Health, 2015. - PubMed

Publication Types