Display options
Share it on

Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Jan;12(1):10-16. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721012. Epub 2021 Jan 06.

Coronary Artery Disease Phenotype Detection in an Academic Hospital System Setting.

Applied clinical informatics

Amy Joseph, Charles Mullett, Christa Lilly, Matthew Armistead, Harold J Cox, Michael Denney, Misha Varma, David Rich, Donald A Adjeroh, Gianfranco Doretto, William Neal, Lee A Pyles

Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States.
  2. West Virginia Clinical and Translational Science Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States.
  3. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States.
  4. West Virginia University Hospital System, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States.
  5. Lane Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States.

PMID: 33406541 PMCID: PMC7787710 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721012

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The United States, and especially West Virginia, have a tremendous burden of coronary artery disease (CAD). Undiagnosed familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an important factor for CAD in the U.S. Identification of a CAD phenotype is an initial step to find families with FH.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that a CAD phenotype detection algorithm that uses discrete data elements from electronic health records (EHRs) can be validated from EHR information housed in a data repository.

METHODS: We developed an algorithm to detect a CAD phenotype which searched through discrete data elements, such as diagnosis, problem lists, medical history, billing, and procedure (International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-9/10 and Current Procedural Terminology [CPT]) codes. The algorithm was applied to two cohorts of 500 patients, each with varying characteristics. The second (younger) cohort consisted of parents from a school child screening program. We then determined which patients had CAD by systematic, blinded review of EHRs. Following this, we revised the algorithm by refining the acceptable diagnoses and procedures. We ran the second algorithm on the same cohorts and determined the accuracy of the modification.

RESULTS: CAD phenotype Algorithm I was 89.6% accurate, 94.6% sensitive, and 85.6% specific for group 1. After revising the algorithm (denoted CAD Algorithm II) and applying it to the same groups 1 and 2, sensitivity 98.2%, specificity 87.8%, and accuracy 92.4; accuracy 93% for group 2. Group 1 F1 score was 92.4%. Specific ICD-10 and CPT codes such as "coronary angiography through a vein graft" were more useful than generic terms.

CONCLUSION: We have created an algorithm, CAD Algorithm II, that detects CAD on a large scale with high accuracy and sensitivity (recall). It has proven useful among varied patient populations. Use of this algorithm can extend to monitor a registry of patients in an EHR and/or to identify a group such as those with likely FH.

Thieme. All rights reserved.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

References

  1. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):162-171 - PubMed
  2. Eur Heart J. 2013 Dec;34(45):3478-90a - PubMed
  3. J Biomed Semantics. 2016 Oct 13;7(1):62 - PubMed
  4. N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1547-1556 - PubMed
  5. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Mar;68(3):218-23 - PubMed
  6. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Apr;22(e1):e93-103 - PubMed
  7. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 24;10(8):e0136651 - PubMed
  8. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 May 7;20(1):85 - PubMed
  9. Acta Paediatr. 2007 Mar;96(3):338-41 - PubMed
  10. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):964-8 - PubMed
  11. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Oct;8(4):1159-1172 - PubMed
  12. Curr Pediatr Rev. 2017;13(4):265-276 - PubMed
  13. Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Jul 20;7(3):693-706 - PubMed
  14. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jul 28;66(4):403-69 - PubMed
  15. PLoS One. 2016 May 03;11(5):e0154288 - PubMed
  16. Circulation. 2018 Nov 11;: - PubMed
  17. Pediatrics. 2010 Aug;126(2):260-5 - PubMed
  18. Am J Cardiol. 1993 Sep 30;72(10):18D-24D - PubMed
  19. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Apr;23(e1):e20-7 - PubMed
  20. Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528 - PubMed
  21. Int J Med Inform. 2016 Oct;94:271-4 - PubMed
  22. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 27;375(17):1628-1637 - PubMed
  23. JAMA. 2014 May 7;311(17):1804-7 - PubMed
  24. J Pediatr. 2011 Nov;159(5):865-7 - PubMed
  25. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:1043-7 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support