Display options
Cite
Sartore GM, Pourliakas A, Lagioia V. Peer support interventions for parents and carers of children with complex needs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;12:CD010618doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010618.pub2.
Sartore, G. M., Pourliakas, A., & Lagioia, V. (2021). Peer support interventions for parents and carers of children with complex needs. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 12CD010618. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010618.pub2
Sartore, Gina-Maree, et al. "Peer support interventions for parents and carers of children with complex needs." The Cochrane database of systematic reviews vol. 12 (2021): CD010618. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010618.pub2
Sartore GM, Pourliakas A, Lagioia V. Peer support interventions for parents and carers of children with complex needs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 20;12:CD010618. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010618.pub2. PMID: 34923624; PMCID: PMC8684823.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 20;12:CD010618. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010618.pub2.

Peer support interventions for parents and carers of children with complex needs.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews

Gina-Maree Sartore, Anastasia Pourliakas, Vince Lagioia

Affiliations

  1. Parenting Research Centre, East Melbourne, Australia.
  2. Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.

PMID: 34923624 PMCID: PMC8684823 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010618.pub2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Parents and family carers of children with complex needs experience a high level of pressure to meet children's needs while maintaining family functioning and, as a consequence, often experience reduced well-being and elevated psychological distress. Peer support interventions are intended to improve parent and carer well-being by enhancing the social support available to them. Support may be delivered via peer mentoring or through support groups (peer or facilitator led). Peer support interventions are widely available, but the potential benefits and risks of such interventions are not well established.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of peer support interventions (compared to usual care or alternate interventions) on psychological and psychosocial outcomes, including adverse outcomes, for parents and other family carers of children with complex needs in any setting.

SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following resources. • Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; latest issue: April 2014), in the Cochrane Library. • MEDLINE (OvidSP) (1966 to 19 March 2014). • Embase (OvidSP) (1974 to 18 March 2014). • Journals@OVID (22 April 2014). • PsycINFO (OvidSP) (1887 to 19 March 2014). • BiblioMap (EPPI-Centre, Health Promotion Research database) (22 April 2014). • ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (26 May 2014). • metaRegister of Controlled Trials (13 May 2014). We conducted a search update of the following databases. • MEDLINE (OvidSP) (2013 to 20 February 2018) (search overlapped to 2013). • PsycINFO (ProQuest) (2013 to 20 February 2018). • Embase (Elsevier) (2013 to 21 February 2018). We handsearched the reference lists of included studies and four key journals (European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: 31 March 2015; Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders: 30 March 2015; Diabetes Educator: 7 April 2015; Journal of Intellectual Disability Research: 13 April 2015). We contacted key investigators and consulted key advocacy groups for advice on identifying unpublished data. We ran updated searches on 14 August 2019 and on 25 May 2021. Studies identified in these searches as eligible for full-text review are listed as "Studies awaiting classification" and will be assessed in a future update.

SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and cluster randomised controlled trials (RCTs and cluster RCTs) and quasi-RCTs were eligible for inclusion. Controlled before-and-after and interrupted time series studies were eligible for inclusion if they met criteria set by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group. The comparator could be usual care or an alternative intervention. The population eligible for inclusion consisted of parents and other family carers of children with any complex needs. We applied no restriction on setting.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Inclusion decisions were made independently by two  authors, with differences resolved by a third  author. Extraction to data extraction templates was conducted independently by two authors and cross-checked. Risk of bias assessments were made independently by two authors and were reported according to Cochrane guidelines. All measures of treatment effect were continuous and were analysed in Review Manager version 5.3. GRADE assessments were undertaken independently by two review authors, with differences resolved by discussion.

MAIN RESULTS: We included 22 studies (21 RCTs, 1 quasi-RCT) of 2404 participants. Sixteen studies compared peer support to usual care; three studies compared peer support to an alternative intervention and to usual care but only data from the usual care arm contributed to results; and three studies compared peer support to an alternative intervention only. We judged risk of bias as moderate to high across all studies, particularly for selection, performance, and detection bias. Included studies contributed data to seven effect estimates compared to usual care: psychological distress (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.32 to 0.11; 8 studies, 864 participants), confidence and self-efficacy (SMD 0.04, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.21; 8 studies, 542 participants), perception of coping (SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.38 to 0.21; 3 studies, 293 participants), quality of life and life satisfaction (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.38; 2 studies, 143 participants), family functioning (SMD 0.15, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.38; 4 studies, 272 participants), perceived social support (SMD 0.31, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.77; 4 studies, 191 participants), and confidence and skill in navigating medical services (SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.28; 4 studies, 304 participants). In comparisons to alternative interventions, one pooled effect estimate was possible: psychological distress (SMD 0.2, 95% CI -0.38 to 0.79; 2 studies, 95 participants). No studies reported on adverse outcomes. All narratively synthesised data for psychological distress (compared to usual care - 2 studies), family functioning (compared to usual care - 1 study; compared to an alternative intervention - 1 study), perceived social support (compared to usual care - 2 studies), and self-efficacy (compared to alternative interventions - 1 study) were equivocal. Comparisons with usual care showed no difference between intervention and control groups (perceived social support), some effect over time for both groups but more effect for intervention (distress), or mixed effects for intervention (family function). Comparisons with alternative interventions showed no difference between the intervention of interest and the alternative. This may indicate similar effects to the intervention of interest or lack of effect of both, and we are  uncertain which option is likely. We found no clear evidence of effects of peer support interventions on any parent outcome, for any comparator; however, the certainty of evidence for each outcome was low to very low, and true effects may differ substantially from those reported here. We found no evidence of adverse events such as mood contagion,  negative group interactions, or worsened psychological health. Qualitative data suggest that parents and carers value peer support interventions and appreciate emotional support.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Parents and carers of children with complex needs perceive peer support interventions as valuable, but this review found no evidence of either benefit or harm. Currently, there is uncertainty about the effects of peer support interventions for parents and carers of children with complex needs. However, given the overall low to very low certainty of available evidence, our estimates showing no effects of interventions may very well change with further research of higher quality.

Copyright © 2021 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

References

  1. Rehabil Psychol. 2010 May;55(2):139-50 - PubMed
  2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 18;(7):CD009338 - PubMed
  3. Health Commun. 2008 Sep;23(5):413-26 - PubMed
  4. Child Care Health Dev. 2015 Mar;41(2):303-13 - PubMed
  5. Br J Clin Psychol. 1983 Nov;22 (Pt 4):245-9 - PubMed
  6. Clin Psychol Rev. 2002 Apr;22(3):383-442 - PubMed
  7. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(20):1673-7 - PubMed
  8. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013 Nov;26(17):1737-41 - PubMed
  9. Aust Occup Ther J. 2010 Apr;57(2):127-36 - PubMed
  10. Diabetes Educ. 2010 Jan-Feb;36(1):88-97 - PubMed
  11. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Sep;38(5):412-27 - PubMed
  12. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2014 Oct;28(5):319-26 - PubMed
  13. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Nov 13;1:66 - PubMed
  14. Am J Ment Retard. 2004 Sep;109(5):352-61 - PubMed
  15. J Adv Nurs. 2012 Sep;68(9):2095-102 - PubMed
  16. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013 Jul;55(7):602-9 - PubMed
  17. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2009 May;22(2):86-98 - PubMed
  18. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;1:CD006440 - PubMed
  19. Behav Res Ther. 1995 Mar;33(3):335-43 - PubMed
  20. J Pediatr Psychol. 1996 Oct;21(5):633-41 - PubMed
  21. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 20;12:CD010618 - PubMed
  22. Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Apr;35(4):833-48 - PubMed
  23. J Soc Pediatr Nurs. 1996 Oct-Dec;1(3):103-9; quiz 111-2 - PubMed
  24. JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Dec 03;3(4):e69 - PubMed
  25. Autism. 2005 Oct;9(4):416-27 - PubMed
  26. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;23(8):637-47 - PubMed
  27. CMAJ. 2003 Apr 15;168(8):969-73 - PubMed
  28. J Adv Nurs. 2002 Jul;39(2):190-8 - PubMed
  29. Qual Health Res. 2000 Mar;10(2):225-41 - PubMed
  30. Am J Ment Retard. 2002 Nov;107(6):433-44 - PubMed
  31. Pediatrics. 2017 Mar;139(3): - PubMed
  32. Ment Retard. 1972 Dec;10(6):14-5 - PubMed
  33. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Jul;70:117-134 - PubMed
  34. Diabetes Educ. 2011 Jul-Aug;37(4):508-18 - PubMed
  35. Diabetes Educ. 2004 May-Jun;30(3):476-84 - PubMed
  36. Res Nurs Health. 1992 Jun;15(3):227-35 - PubMed
  37. Am J Ment Retard. 2007 Sep;112(5):330-48 - PubMed
  38. Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jan;64(1):150-63 - PubMed
  39. Behav Ther. 2008 Mar;39(1):33-46 - PubMed
  40. Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Oct;183:342-8 - PubMed
  41. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 14;2:CD001055 - PubMed
  42. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jul;53(1):71-80 - PubMed
  43. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2001;21(2-3):29-48 - PubMed
  44. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 19;4:CD012331 - PubMed
  45. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004 Nov;45(8):1338-49 - PubMed
  46. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2007 Sep;1(2):116-24 - PubMed
  47. J Spinal Cord Med. 2002 Summer;25(2):129-32 - PubMed
  48. Arch Dis Child. 2005 Oct;90(10):1053-7 - PubMed
  49. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Nov;51(11):1524-37 - PubMed
  50. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2002 Sep;31(3):384-92 - PubMed
  51. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 22;19(8):e287 - PubMed
  52. Child Care Health Dev. 2011 Sep;37(5):679-91 - PubMed
  53. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Jun;48(11):1563-75 - PubMed
  54. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 08;(4):CD006903 - PubMed
  55. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 May;47(5):1314-1322 - PubMed
  56. Iran J Cancer Prev. 2012 Fall;5(4):183-8 - PubMed
  57. BMC Pediatr. 2014 Jan 28;14:24 - PubMed
  58. Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124(6):1522-32 - PubMed
  59. Am J Ment Retard. 2002 Mar;107(2):116-27 - PubMed
  60. Child Care Health Dev. 2000 Jul;26(4):309-22 - PubMed
  61. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2011 Jul-Aug;36(4):224-31 - PubMed
  62. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010 Jun;19 Suppl 1:4-22 - PubMed
  63. Codas. 2015 Sep-Oct;27(5):411-8 - PubMed
  64. Autism. 2013 Jan;17(1):27-43 - PubMed
  65. Child Care Health Dev. 2006 Jan;32(1):19-31 - PubMed
  66. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 1992 Jan-Mar;15(1):55-67 - PubMed
  67. Med Care. 1980 Apr;18(4):465-72 - PubMed
  68. BMJ. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1166 - PubMed
  69. Front Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 18;9:710 - PubMed
  70. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013 Jul;43(7):1662-75 - PubMed
  71. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Sep 27;2:55 - PubMed
  72. Haemophilia. 2012 Nov;18(6):892-7 - PubMed
  73. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007 May;19(5):251-60 - PubMed
  74. J Pediatr Psychol. 1998 Apr;23(2):99-109 - PubMed
  75. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2005 Jan;49(Pt 1):47-53 - PubMed
  76. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 17;6:CD009912 - PubMed
  77. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Jul;155(7):771-7 - PubMed
  78. J Adv Nurs. 2006 Feb;53(4):392-402 - PubMed
  79. BMJ. 2011 Jul 22;343:d4002 - PubMed

Publication Types