Display options
Cite
Moore JW. "They Were Noble Automatons Who Knew Not What They Did:" Volition in Jaynes' . Front Psychol. 2021;12:811295doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.811295.
Moore, J. W. (2021). "They Were Noble Automatons Who Knew Not What They Did:" Volition in Jaynes' . Frontiers in psychology, 12811295. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.811295
Moore, James W. ""They Were Noble Automatons Who Knew Not What They Did:" Volition in Jaynes' ." Frontiers in psychology vol. 12 (2021): 811295. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.811295
Moore JW. "They Were Noble Automatons Who Knew Not What They Did:" Volition in Jaynes' . Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 20;12:811295. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.811295. eCollection 2021. PMID: 34987458; PMCID: PMC8720781.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 20;12:811295. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.811295. eCollection 2021.

"They Were Noble Automatons Who Knew Not What They Did:" Volition in Jaynes' .

Frontiers in psychology

James W Moore

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths University of London, London, United Kingdom.

PMID: 34987458 PMCID: PMC8720781 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.811295

Abstract

An important question in consciousness research concerns its origins. In Julian Jaynes' book,

Copyright © 2021 Moore.

Keywords: Julian Jaynes; bicameral mind; consciousness; history of psychology; origins; volition

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publication Types