Display options
Share it on

Biomed Res Int. 2021 Dec 22;2021:9008772. doi: 10.1155/2021/9008772. eCollection 2021.

Maternal and Neonatal Outcome following Day Two versus Day Five or Seven Discharge after an Uncomplicated Elective Caesarean Section: A Randomized Control Study.

BioMed research international

Fidelis A Onu, Chidebe C Anikwe, Johnbosco E Mamah, Okechukwu B Anozie, Osita S Umeononihu, Bartholomew C Okorochukwu, Ayodele A Olaleye, John O Egede, Cyril C Ikeoha, Chigozie F Okoroafor

Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, P.M.B. 102 Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria.
  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, P.M.B. 5025 Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.
  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Federal Medical Centre Owerri, P.O. Box 1010 Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria.

PMID: 34977248 PMCID: PMC8716226 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9008772

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent times, it has become a common practice to discharge a woman early after an uncomplicated caesarean section (CS), to satisfy their wishes, reduce cost, and maximize efficient use of healthcare system resources.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a comparative analysis of maternal and neonatal outcomes following day two hospital discharge versus day 5 or 7 discharge after an uncomplicated CS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible parturient (228) who met the inclusion criteria were randomized into two groups between 1

RESULTS: Day 2 discharge was not associated with a higher rate of readmission as compared with day 5-7 discharge (

CONCLUSION: Early discharge of patients after an uncomplicated CS is not associated with increased rate of readmission. It is associated with good maternal satisfaction, adequate initiation and sustenance of breastfeeding, and good neonatal wellbeing. We advocate early discharge of women following uncomplicated CS.

Copyright © 2021 Fidelis A. Onu et al.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Lancet. 1985 Aug 24;2(8452):436-7 - PubMed
  2. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1996 Sep;25(7):595-600 - PubMed
  3. Matern Child Health J. 2013 May;17(4):616-23 - PubMed
  4. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Nov;84(5):832-8 - PubMed
  5. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Aug 18;10:47 - PubMed
  6. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;120(6):1273-82 - PubMed
  7. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014 May;23(2):157-60 - PubMed
  8. J Matern Fetal Med. 1998 Mar-Apr;7(2):72-5 - PubMed
  9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 May 24;12:125 - PubMed
  10. Afr Health Sci. 2019 Sep;19(3):2660-2669 - PubMed
  11. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;90(5):860-5 - PubMed
  12. Acta Paediatr. 2004 May;93(5):669-76 - PubMed
  13. Ups J Med Sci. 2000;105(1):57-66 - PubMed
  14. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;193(3 Pt 1):714-26 - PubMed
  15. Birth. 2002 Dec;29(4):258-65 - PubMed
  16. Niger J Clin Pract. 2011 Jul-Sep;14(3):276-9 - PubMed
  17. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jun 30;21(1):466 - PubMed
  18. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug 16;6:102 - PubMed

Publication Types