Display options
Share it on

J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 28;11(1). doi: 10.3390/jcm11010145.

Operator Performance of the Digital Setup Fabrication for Orthodontic-Orthognathic Treatment: An Explorative Study.

Journal of clinical medicine

Olivier de Waard, Robin Bruggink, Frank Baan, Hendrikus A J Reukers, Ewald M Bronkhorst, Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman, Edwin M Ongkosuwito

Affiliations

  1. Department of Dentistry-Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  2. Radboudumc 3D Lab, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  3. Kindt & Reukers Orthodontists, 6524 CV Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  4. Department of Dentistry, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  5. Department of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
  6. Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.
  7. Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia.

PMID: 35011886 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11010145

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the operator performance of the fabrication of digital orthodontic setups integrated into cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Fifteen patients who underwent a combined orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment were included. The pre-treatment digital dental models and CBCT scans were fused, and four operators made virtual setups twice for all patients. Differences between the virtual setups were calculated by recording tooth crown movement from the pre-treatment model to the virtual setup. To examine performance, Pearson's correlation coefficients, duplicate measurement errors, and inter-operator differences were calculated. For intra-operator performance, correlation values varied among tooth types, with mean correlation values from 0.66 to 0.83 for the maxilla and 0.70 to 0.83 for the mandible. For inter-operator performance, mean correlation values varied from 0.40 to 0.87 for the maxilla and from 0.44 to 0.80 for the mandible. Rotational mean differences exceeded the range of clinical acceptance (>2 degrees) at 18% for the maxilla and 20.8% for the mandible, and translational mean differences exceeded the range of clinical acceptance (0.6 mm) at 9.7% and 26% for the maxilla and mandible, respectively. The intra- and inter-operator performance of digital orthodontic setup construction for virtual three-dimensional orthognathic planning shows significant errors.

Keywords: CBCT; orthodontics; orthognathic surgery; setup

Publication Types