Display options
Share it on

MethodsX. 2021 Nov 25;8:101593. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101593. eCollection 2021.

High throughput method to determine the surface activity of antimicrobial polymeric materials.

MethodsX

Wilma van Rensburg, Wikus Ernst Laubscher, Marina Rautenbach

Affiliations

  1. BIOPEP Peptide Group, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.

PMID: 35004225 PMCID: PMC8720914 DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101593

Abstract

Surface colonization by microorganisms, combined with the rise in antibiotic resistance, is the main cause of production failures in various industries. Self-sterilising materials are deemed the best prevention of surface colonization. However, current screening methods for these sterilising materials are laborious and time-consuming. The disk diffusion antimicrobial assay and the Japanese industrial standard method for antimicrobial activity on solid surfaces, JIS Z 2801, were compared to our modified solid surface antimicrobial assay in terms of detecting the activity of antibiotic-containing cellulose disks against four bacterial pathogens. Our novel assay circumvents the long incubation times by utilising the metabolic active dye, resazurin, to shorten the time in which antibacterial results are obtained to less than 4 h. This assay allows for increased screening to identify novel sterilising materials for combatting surface colonisation.•Disk diffusion assay could only detect the activity of small compounds that leached from the material over 20-24 h.•JIS Z 2801 was also able to detect the surface activity of non-polar compounds, thought to be inactive based on the disk diffusion results.•The resazurin solid surface antimicrobial assay could obtain the same results as the JIS Z 2801, within a shorter time and in a high-throughput 96-well plate setup.

© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Keywords: Antimicrobial surface screening; Disk diffusion assay; JIS Z 2801; Resazurin assay; Self-sterilising materials

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Acta Biomater. 2017 Sep 1;59:139-147 - PubMed
  2. Acta Biomater. 2018 Apr 1;70:12-24 - PubMed
  3. J Food Prot. 1999 Jun;62(6):644-9 - PubMed
  4. Biochem J. 1944;38(1):61-5 - PubMed
  5. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2015 Sep;61(3):238-44 - PubMed
  6. Braz J Microbiol. 2010 Apr;41(2):270-7 - PubMed
  7. Biomacromolecules. 2014 Sep 8;15(9):3390-5 - PubMed
  8. Am J Infect Control. 2013 May;41(5 Suppl):S6-11 - PubMed
  9. Biomaterials. 2013 Nov;34(34):8533-54 - PubMed
  10. Methods. 2007 Aug;42(4):321-4 - PubMed
  11. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014 Feb 12;6(3):1439-46 - PubMed
  12. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005 Feb;19(2):231-8 - PubMed
  13. Braz Oral Res. 2009 Jul-Sep;23(3):255-62 - PubMed
  14. Sci Rep. 2011;1:165 - PubMed
  15. Biotechnol Lett. 2016 Jun;38(6):1015-9 - PubMed
  16. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1973 Mar-Apr;3(2):135-40 - PubMed
  17. Int J Pept Protein Res. 1996 Jun;47(6):460-6 - PubMed
  18. J Hosp Infect. 2020 Jan;104(1):85-91 - PubMed
  19. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Jan;17(1):7-15 - PubMed
  20. J Food Prot. 2003 Apr;66(4):559-69 - PubMed
  21. Biochem Res Int. 2012;2012:832059 - PubMed
  22. Eur J Biochem. 2000 Sep;267(17):5421-6 - PubMed
  23. BMC Microbiol. 2014 Oct 07;14:259 - PubMed
  24. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Dec;24(6):859-63 - PubMed
  25. J Hosp Infect. 2018 Jul;99(3):239-249 - PubMed
  26. Langmuir. 2011 Mar 15;27(6):3012-9 - PubMed
  27. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Dec;77(24):8714-21 - PubMed

Publication Types