Display options
Share it on

J Nutr. 2022 Jan 11;152(1):163-170. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab352.

Vitamin B12 and Folate Markers Are Associated with Insulin Resistance During the Third Trimester of Pregnancy in South Asian Women, Living in the United Kingdom, with Gestational Diabetes and Normal Glucose Tolerance.

The Journal of nutrition

Agata Sobczyńska-Malefora, Chittaranjan S Yajnik, Dominic J Harrington, Graham A Hitman, Sarah Finer

Affiliations

  1. Nutristasis Unit, Viapath, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  2. Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  3. Diabetes Unit, KEM Hospital, Pune, India.
  4. Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
  5. Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
  6. Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.

PMID: 34601603 PMCID: PMC8754569 DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxab352

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can adversely affect the health of the developing fetus. Women of South Asian origin are particularly at risk of developing GDM. Insulin resistance (IR) contributes to the etiology of GDM, and although studies have shown associations of vitamin B12 (B12) and folate status with GDM and IR, only a limited number of B12 and folate markers have been used.

OBJECTIVE: We used a comprehensive panel of B12 and folate markers to examine their association with IR in pregnant women with diet-controlled GDM and normal glucose tolerance (NGT).

METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 59 British-Bangladeshi women (24 GDM and 35 NGT) with a mean age of 29 y, BMI (in kg/m2) 26.7 and gestational age 33 wk were recruited. Serum total B12, holotranscobalamin, folate, methylmalonic acid, plasma homocysteine, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, and red cell folate (RCF) were measured along with other parameters. The independent sample t-test and chi-squared test were used to assess differences in markers between GDM and NGT women. Spearman's test was used to look for correlations. A simple multiple regression analysis was used to investigate if markers of B12 and folate status predicted IR, using the HOMA-IR and adjusting for age, GDM status, and BMI.

RESULTS: There were no differences in concentrations of B12 and folate markers between GDM and NGT women. In Spearman's analysis HOMA-IR correlated negatively with total serum B12 (P < 0.001) and holotranscobalamin (P < 0.05), and positively with BMI (P < 0.001), blood pressure (P < 0.05) and triglycerides (P < 0.05) in all women. MMA did not correlate with any of the B12 markers. In regression analysis, total B12 (β = -0.622, P = 0.004), RCF (β = 0.387, P = 0.018), and BMI (β = 0.024, P < 0.001) were the significant predictors of HOMA-IR variance.

CONCLUSIONS: Significant associations between markers of B12 and folate status with HOMA-IR were found during the third trimester in British-Bangladeshi women. B12 markers correlated poorly with each other.

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Keywords: folate; gestational diabetes; insulin resistance; pregnancy; vitamin B12

References

  1. Biochem J. 1985 Nov 15;232(1):177-82 - PubMed
  2. BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 12;6(8):e011247 - PubMed
  3. Endocrine. 2019 Nov;66(2):149-156 - PubMed
  4. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2021 May 11;:1-9 - PubMed
  5. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017 Feb;71(2):159-163 - PubMed
  6. Clin Chem. 2002 Jun;48(6 Pt 1):928-33 - PubMed
  7. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Feb;103(2):176-85 - PubMed
  8. Clin Nutr. 2018 Jun;37(3):940-947 - PubMed
  9. Diabetologia. 2008 Jan;51(1):29-38 - PubMed
  10. Lancet. 2004 Jan 10;363(9403):157-63 - PubMed
  11. Diabetologia. 2009 Nov;52(11):2350-8 - PubMed
  12. Adv Hematol. 2014;2014:465623 - PubMed
  13. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982 Jan;35(1):87-94 - PubMed
  14. J Nutr. 2007 Aug;137(8):1863-7 - PubMed
  15. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2021 Sep;58(6):399-429 - PubMed
  16. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Jul;78(1):7-21 - PubMed
  17. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014 Sep 26;13:129 - PubMed
  18. Nutrients. 2016 Dec 01;8(12): - PubMed
  19. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Jun;83(6):543-7 - PubMed
  20. Ginekol Pol. 2019;90(7):381-387 - PubMed
  21. J Nutr. 2003 May;133(5 Suppl 2):1674S-1683S - PubMed
  22. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 Jul;53(8):1215-25 - PubMed
  23. Clin Biochem. 2014 Jan;47(1-2):82-6 - PubMed
  24. Metabolism. 2003 Jun;52(6):720-3 - PubMed
  25. J Family Reprod Health. 2021 Sep;15(3):141-149 - PubMed
  26. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 26;367(4):385-6 - PubMed
  27. Diabet Med. 2014 Mar;31(3):263-72 - PubMed
  28. Haematologica. 2007 Dec;92(12):1711-2 - PubMed
  29. Hum Mol Genet. 2015 Jun 1;24(11):3021-9 - PubMed
  30. Kidney Int. 1999 Mar;55(3):1028-35 - PubMed
  31. J Intern Med. 2000 Feb;247(2):287-94 - PubMed
  32. Adv Nutr. 2017 Nov 15;8(6):971-979 - PubMed
  33. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006 Oct;274(6):333-7 - PubMed
  34. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Apr;180(4):903-16 - PubMed
  35. Diabetologia. 2019 Dec;62(12):2171-2178 - PubMed
  36. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Nov 1;102(11):4200-4209 - PubMed
  37. Clin Epigenetics. 2015 Feb 27;7:14 - PubMed
  38. J Clin Pathol. 2018 Nov;71(11):949-956 - PubMed
  39. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 Oct;278(4):309-13 - PubMed
  40. Front Pediatr. 2014 Oct 17;2:112 - PubMed
  41. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016 Feb;174(2):R43-51 - PubMed
  42. PLoS Med. 2020 Nov 5;17(11):e1003229 - PubMed
  43. BMC Public Health. 2016 Mar 01;16:207 - PubMed
  44. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0135268 - PubMed
  45. Diabet Med. 2015 Mar;32(3):291-4 - PubMed
  46. Clin Chem. 2004 Jan;50(1):3-32 - PubMed
  47. J Nutr. 2004 Jan;134(1):205-10 - PubMed
  48. Diabetes Care. 1998 Dec;21(12):2191-2 - PubMed
  49. Diabetes Care. 2007 Jul;30 Suppl 2:S112-9 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support