Display options
Cite
Clancy AA, Tiruta C, Ashman D, et al. The song remains the same although the instruments are changing: complications following selective non-operative management of blunt spleen trauma: a retrospective review of patients at a level I trauma centre from 1996 to 2007. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2012;6(1):4doi: 10.1186/1752-2897-6-4.
Clancy, A. A., Tiruta, C., Ashman, D., Ball, C. G., & Kirkpatrick, A. W. (2012). The song remains the same although the instruments are changing: complications following selective non-operative management of blunt spleen trauma: a retrospective review of patients at a level I trauma centre from 1996 to 2007. Journal of trauma management & outcomes, 6(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-2897-6-4
Clancy, Aisling A, et al. "The song remains the same although the instruments are changing: complications following selective non-operative management of blunt spleen trauma: a retrospective review of patients at a level I trauma centre from 1996 to 2007." Journal of trauma management & outcomes vol. 6,1 (2012): 4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-2897-6-4
Clancy AA, Tiruta C, Ashman D, Ball CG, Kirkpatrick AW. The song remains the same although the instruments are changing: complications following selective non-operative management of blunt spleen trauma: a retrospective review of patients at a level I trauma centre from 1996 to 2007. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2012 Mar 13;6(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1752-2897-6-4. PMID: 22410104; PMCID: PMC3338082.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2012 Mar 13;6(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1752-2897-6-4.

The song remains the same although the instruments are changing: complications following selective non-operative management of blunt spleen trauma: a retrospective review of patients at a level I trauma centre from 1996 to 2007.

Journal of trauma management & outcomes

Aisling A Clancy, Corina Tiruta, Dianne Ashman, Chad G Ball, Andrew W Kirkpatrick

Affiliations

  1. Regional Trauma Services, Calgary, AB, Canada. [email protected].

PMID: 22410104 PMCID: PMC3338082 DOI: 10.1186/1752-2897-6-4

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite a widespread shift to selective non-operative management (SNOM) for blunt splenic trauma, there remains uncertainty regarding the role of adjuncts such as interventional radiological techniques, the need for follow-up imaging, and the incidence of long-term complications. We evaluated the success of SNOM (including splenic artery embolization, SAE) for the management of blunt splenic injuries in severely injured patients.

METHODS: Retrospective review (1996-2007) of the Alberta Trauma Registry and health records for blunt splenic trauma patients, aged 18 and older, with injury severity scores of 12 or greater, admitted to the Foothills Medical Centre.

RESULTS: Among 538 eligible patients, 150 (26%) underwent early operative intervention. The proportion of patients managed by SNOM rose from 50 to 78% over the study period, with an overall success rate of SNOM of 87%, while injury acuity remained unchanged over time. Among SNOM failures, 65% underwent surgery within 24 hours of admission. Splenic arterial embolization (SAE) was used in only 7% of patients managed non-operatively, although at least 21% of failed SNOM had contrast extravasation potentially amenable to SAE. Among Calgary residents undergoing SNOM, hospital readmission within six months was required in three (2%), all of whom who required emergent intervention (splenectomy 2, SAE 1) and in whom none had post-discharge follow-up imaging. Overall, the use of post-discharge follow-up CT imaging was low following SNOM (10%), and thus no CT images identified occult hemorrhage or pseudoaneurysm. We observed seven cases of delayed splenic rupture in our population which occurred from five days to two months following initial injury. Three of these occurred in the post-discharge period requiring readmission and intervention.

CONCLUSIONS: SNOM was the initial treatment strategy for most patients with blunt splenic trauma with 13% requiring subsequent operative intervention intended for the spleen. Cases of delayed splenic rupture occurred up to two months following initial injury. The low use of both follow-up imaging and SAE make assessment of the utility of these adjuncts difficult and adherence to formalized protocols will be required to fully assess the benefit of multi-modality management strategies.

References

  1. J Trauma. 1995 Sep;39(3):507-12; discussion 512-3 - PubMed
  2. Am Surg. 2007 Jan;73(1):13-8 - PubMed
  3. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007 Aug;13(4):399-404 - PubMed
  4. Surgery. 2007 Sep;142(3):337-42 - PubMed
  5. Sci Am. 1983 Aug;249(2):28-35 - PubMed
  6. J Trauma. 2000 Apr;48(4):606-10; discussion 610-2 - PubMed
  7. J Trauma. 1997 Nov;43(5):748-51 - PubMed
  8. J Trauma. 2009 Jun;66(6):1531-6; discussion 1536-8 - PubMed
  9. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009 Apr;35(2):102 - PubMed
  10. Am Surg. 2003 Mar;69(3):238-42; discussion 242-3 - PubMed
  11. Surgery. 2007 Feb;141(2):229-38 - PubMed
  12. J Trauma. 2005 Oct;59(4):926-32; discussion 932 - PubMed
  13. Am Surg. 2007 Sep;73(9):897-902 - PubMed
  14. Surgery. 1996 Oct;120(4):745-50; discussion 750-1 - PubMed
  15. Isr Med Assoc J. 2007 Dec;9(12):857-61 - PubMed
  16. J Trauma. 2004 Mar;56(3):542-7 - PubMed
  17. J Trauma. 1995 Nov;39(5):818-25; discussion 826-7 - PubMed
  18. Am J Surg. 2005 Mar;189(3):335-9 - PubMed
  19. J Trauma. 1995 Mar;38(3):323-4 - PubMed
  20. J Trauma. 2001 Dec;51(6):1161-5 - PubMed
  21. Arch Surg. 2003 Aug;138(8):844-51 - PubMed
  22. J Trauma. 2000 Aug;49(2):177-87; discussion 187-9 - PubMed
  23. World J Surg. 2008 Mar;32(3):476-82 - PubMed
  24. Arch Surg. 1998 Jun;133(6):619-24; discussion 624-5 - PubMed
  25. JACEP. 1977 Aug;6(8):343-50 - PubMed
  26. Can J Surg. 2011 Oct;54(5):E3-4 - PubMed
  27. J Trauma. 2004 Apr;56(4):768-72; discussion 773 - PubMed
  28. J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Aug;201(2):179-87 - PubMed
  29. J Trauma. 2008 Mar;64(3):656-63; discussion 663-5 - PubMed
  30. J Trauma. 2007 May;62(5):1143-7; discussion 1147-8 - PubMed
  31. J Trauma. 2005 Mar;58(3):492-8 - PubMed
  32. Radiology. 1995 Jan;194(1):97-100 - PubMed
  33. J Trauma. 2010 May;68(5):1112-6 - PubMed
  34. Can J Surg. 2004 Dec;47(6):446-50 - PubMed
  35. J Trauma. 2004 May;56(5):1063-7 - PubMed
  36. J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4):1085-91; discussion 1091-2 - PubMed
  37. J Trauma. 1998 Feb;44(2):283-6 - PubMed
  38. J Trauma. 2006 Sep;61(3):541-4; discussion 545-6 - PubMed
  39. Can J Surg. 2006 Dec;49(6):386-90 - PubMed
  40. J Trauma. 2007 Sep;63(3):615-9 - PubMed
  41. Crit Care Med. 2007 May;35(5 Suppl):S162-72 - PubMed
  42. J Trauma. 2007 Jul;63(1):44-9 - PubMed
  43. J Trauma. 2001 May;50(5):835-42 - PubMed
  44. Can J Surg. 2005 Dec;48(6):453-60 - PubMed

Publication Types