Display options
Share it on

Br J Cancer. 2012 Mar 27;106(7):1262-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.68. Epub 2012 Mar 13.

The Aarhus statement: improving design and reporting of studies on early cancer diagnosis.

British journal of cancer

D Weller, P Vedsted, G Rubin, F M Walter, J Emery, S Scott, C Campbell, R S Andersen, W Hamilton, F Olesen, P Rose, S Nafees, E van Rijswijk, S Hiom, C Muth, M Beyer, R D Neal

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. [email protected]

PMID: 22415239 PMCID: PMC3314787 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.68

Abstract

Early diagnosis is a key factor in improving the outcomes of cancer patients. A greater understanding of the pre-diagnostic patient pathways is vital yet, at present, research in this field lacks consistent definitions and methods. As a consequence much early diagnosis research is difficult to interpret. A consensus group was formed with the aim of producing guidance and a checklist for early cancer-diagnosis researchers. A consensus conference approach combined with nominal group techniques was used. The work was supported by a systematic review of early diagnosis literature, focussing on existing instruments used to measure time points and intervals in early cancer-diagnosis research. A series of recommendations for definitions and methodological approaches is presented. This is complemented by a checklist that early diagnosis researchers can use when designing and conducting studies in this field. The Aarhus checklist is a resource for early cancer-diagnosis research that should promote greater precision and transparency in both definitions and methods. Further work will examine whether the checklist can be readily adopted by researchers, and feedback on the guidance will be used in future updates.

References

  1. Br J Cancer. 2009 Dec 3;101 Suppl 2:S9-S12 - PubMed
  2. Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):539-49 - PubMed
  3. J Health Psychol. 2001 Sep;6(5):511-21 - PubMed
  4. BMJ. 2002 Nov 30;325(7375):1254-5 - PubMed
  5. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Jul;45(2):231-46 - PubMed
  6. Br J Cancer. 2009 Dec 3;101 Suppl 2:S5-8 - PubMed
  7. Br J Cancer. 2011 Mar 15;104(6):934-40 - PubMed
  8. Fam Pract. 2005 Oct;22(5):548-53 - PubMed
  9. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Dec 09;11:163 - PubMed
  10. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007 Jul;12(3):173-80 - PubMed
  11. Soc Sci Med. 1984;19(5):499-510 - PubMed
  12. Med J Aust. 2010 Sep 20;193(6):326-30 - PubMed
  13. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2014 Sep;23 Suppl 1:1-35 - PubMed
  14. Br J Cancer. 2009 Dec 3;101 Suppl 2:S1-4 - PubMed
  15. Therapie. 1994 May-Jun;49(3):185-90 - PubMed
  16. J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Jan;46(1):131-7 - PubMed
  17. BMJ. 2002 Jul 27;325(7357):196 - PubMed
  18. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Apr;17(2):110-8 - PubMed
  19. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 Oct;4(4):236-48 - PubMed
  20. Dig Dis Sci. 2010 May;55(5):1434-41 - PubMed
  21. Qual Quant. 2009 May;43(3):333-349 - PubMed
  22. Br J Gen Pract. 2011 May;61(586):317-8 - PubMed
  23. Image J Nurs Sch. 1997;29(2):175-81 - PubMed
  24. Lancet. 2011 Jan 8;377(9760):127-38 - PubMed
  25. BMJ. 2009 Aug 13;339:b3094 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support