Display options
Share it on

BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 26;4(6):e003987. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003987.

Scaling up integrated prevention campaigns for global health: costs and cost-effectiveness in 70 countries.

BMJ open

Elliot Marseille, Aliya Jiwani, Abhishek Raut, Stéphane Verguet, Judd Walson, James G Kahn

Affiliations

  1. Health Strategies International, Oakland, California, USA.
  2. Health Strategies International, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
  3. Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  4. Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  5. Departments of Global Health, Medicine, Pediatrics, and Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  6. Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.

PMID: 24969782 PMCID: PMC4078786 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003987

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study estimated the health impact, cost and cost-effectiveness of an integrated prevention campaign (IPC) focused on diarrhoea, malaria and HIV in 70 countries ranked by per capita disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) burden for the three diseases.

METHODS: We constructed a deterministic cost-effectiveness model portraying an IPC combining counselling and testing, cotrimoxazole prophylaxis, referral to treatment and condom distribution for HIV prevention; bed nets for malaria prevention; and provision of household water filters for diarrhoea prevention. We developed a mix of empirical and modelled cost and health impact estimates applied to all 70 countries. One-way, multiway and scenario sensitivity analyses were conducted to document the strength of our findings. We used a healthcare payer's perspective, discounted costs and DALYs at 3% per year and denominated cost in 2012 US dollars.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was cost-effectiveness expressed as net cost per DALY averted. Other outcomes included cost of the IPC; net IPC costs adjusted for averted and additional medical costs and DALYs averted.

RESULTS: Implementation of the IPC in the 10 most cost-effective countries at 15% population coverage would cost US$583 million over 3 years (adjusted costs of US$398 million), averting 8.0 million DALYs. Extending IPC programmes to all 70 of the identified high-burden countries at 15% coverage would cost an adjusted US$51.3 billion and avert 78.7 million DALYs. Incremental cost-effectiveness ranged from US$49 per DALY averted for the 10 countries with the most favourable cost-effectiveness to US$119, US$181, US$335, US$1692 and US$8340 per DALY averted as each successive group of 10 countries is added ordered by decreasing cost-effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS: IPC appears cost-effective in many settings, and has the potential to substantially reduce the burden of disease in resource-poor countries. This study increases confidence that IPC can be an important new approach for enhancing global health.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Keywords: Health Economics

References

  1. Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Jan;58(546):3-4 - PubMed
  2. Lancet. 2004 Oct 16-22;364(9443):1428-34 - PubMed
  3. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2009 Jan 22;7:3 - PubMed
  4. S Afr Med J. 2009 May;99(5):320-5 - PubMed
  5. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007 Jul 1;45(3):348-54 - PubMed
  6. Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Jul 1;89(7):504-12 - PubMed
  7. BMC Public Health. 2008 Sep 16;8:317 - PubMed
  8. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2008 Feb 14;6:3 - PubMed
  9. PLoS One. 2011 Feb 24;6(2):e17439 - PubMed
  10. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Jul;29(7):579-99 - PubMed
  11. AIDS. 2011 Sep 10;25(14):1753-60 - PubMed
  12. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD003255 - PubMed
  13. Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Feb;86(2):101-10 - PubMed
  14. PLoS Med. 2006 Dec;3(12):e517 - PubMed
  15. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31316 - PubMed
  16. J Water Health. 2007 Dec;5(4):599-608 - PubMed
  17. AIDS. 2008 Jul;22 Suppl 1:S141-8 - PubMed
  18. BMC Public Health. 2012 Apr 06;12:276 - PubMed
  19. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec 21;11:346 - PubMed
  20. ScientificWorldJournal. 2003 Aug 19;3:721-30 - PubMed
  21. BMC Public Health. 2012 Mar 21;12:220 - PubMed
  22. BMJ Open. 2014 Mar 19;4(3):e004308 - PubMed
  23. Science. 2011 Jun 17;332(6036):1384-5 - PubMed
  24. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1996 Mar;30(1):1-8 - PubMed
  25. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2009 Apr 13;7:6 - PubMed
  26. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Jan;84(1):5-14 - PubMed
  27. PLoS Med. 2011 Dec;8(12):e1001142 - PubMed
  28. Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2197-223 - PubMed
  29. Malar J. 2008 Feb 15;7:32 - PubMed
  30. PLoS One. 2010 Aug 26;5(8):e12435 - PubMed
  31. Lancet. 2009 Dec 19;374(9707):2080-2089 - PubMed
  32. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(2):CD000363 - PubMed
  33. J Infect Dis. 2009 Nov 1;200 Suppl 1:S76-84 - PubMed
  34. Trends Parasitol. 2006 Jul;22(7):285-91 - PubMed
  35. AIDS Behav. 2008 May;12(3):363-73 - PubMed
  36. Malar J. 2010 Jun 15;9:163 - PubMed
  37. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2009;7(4):229-43 - PubMed
  38. Trop Med Int Health. 2008 Aug;13(8):1005-15 - PubMed
  39. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009 Mar 1;50(3):327-30 - PubMed
  40. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009 May;80(5):819-23 - PubMed
  41. MedGenMed. 2006 Nov 01;8(4):24 - PubMed
  42. Malar J. 2010 Dec 30;9:377 - PubMed
  43. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51993 - PubMed
  44. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 4;151(3):157-66 - PubMed
  45. Malar J. 2008 Mar 20;7:49 - PubMed
  46. Salud Publica Mex. 2008;50 Suppl 4:S437-44 - PubMed
  47. Malar J. 2010 Nov 22;9:333 - PubMed
  48. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2006 Dec 06;4:20 - PubMed
  49. Malar J. 2011 Oct 31;10:327 - PubMed
  50. AIDS Care. 2008 May;20(5):582-7 - PubMed
  51. S Afr Med J. 2006 Feb;96(2):140-3 - PubMed
  52. AIDS. 2003 Nov 7;17(16):2375-81 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support