BMJ Open. 2012 Aug 20;2(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001591. Print 2012.

How long after a miscarriage should women wait before becoming pregnant again? Multivariate analysis of cohort data from Matlab, Bangladesh.

BMJ open

Julie Davanzo, Lauren Hale, Mizanur Rahman

PMID: 22907047 PMCID: PMC3425891 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001591

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimum interpregnancy interval (IPI) following a miscarriage.

DESIGN: Multivariate analysis of population-based, prospective data from a demographic surveillance system.

SETTING: Pregnancies in Matlab, Bangladesh, between 1977 and 2008.

PARTICIPANTS: 9214 women with 10 453 pregnancies that ended in a miscarriage and were followed by another pregnancy outcome.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome of pregnancy following the miscarriage was singleton live birth, stillbirth, miscarriage or induced abortion. For pregnancies that ended in live birth: early neonatal, late neonatal and postneonatal mortality.

RESULTS: Compared with IPIs of 6-12 months, pregnancies that were conceived ≤3 months after a miscarriage were more likely to result in a live birth and less likely to result in a miscarriage (adjusted relative risk ratio (RRR) 0.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.86) or induced abortion (0.50, 0.29 to 0.89). Induced abortions were significantly more likely following IPIs of 18-24 months (2.36, 1.48 to 3.76), 36-48 months (2.73, 1.50 to 4.94), and >48 months (3.32, 1.68 to 2.95), and miscarriages were more likely following IPIs of 12-17 months (1.25, 1.01 to 1.56) and >48 months (1.90, 1.40 to 2.58). No significant effects of IPI duration are seen on the risks of a stillbirth. However, IPIs≤3 months following a miscarriage are associated with significantly higher late neonatal mortality for the infant born at the end of the IPI (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.74, 1.06 to 2.84), and IPIs of 12-18 months are associated with a significantly lower unadjusted risk of postneonatal mortality (0.54, 0.30 to 0.96).

CONCLUSIONS: The shorter the IPI following a miscarriage, the more likely the subsequent pregnancy is to result in a live birth. However, very short IPIs may not be advisable following miscarriages in poor countries like Bangladesh because they are associated with a higher risk of mortality for the infants born after them.

References

1. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Apr;89 Suppl 1:S34-40 - PubMed
2. BMJ. 2003 Aug 9;327(7410):313 - PubMed
3. BMJ. 2010 Aug 05;341:c3967 - PubMed
4. N Engl J Med. 1985 Jan 10;312(2):82-90 - PubMed
5. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;102(1):101-8 - PubMed
6. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1985;64(3):277-8 - PubMed
7. J Biosoc Sci. 1983 Jul;15(3):307-16 - PubMed
8. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Apr;89 Suppl 1:S41-9 - PubMed
9. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(7):608-14 - PubMed
10. BMJ. 2000 Nov 18;321(7271):1255-9 - PubMed
11. J Perinat Med. 1994;22(3):235-41 - PubMed
12. Popul Stud (Camb). 2008 Jul;62(2):131-54 - PubMed
13. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1230-4; discussion 1234-6 - PubMed
14. Am J Public Health. 1992 May;82(5):691-4 - PubMed
15. BJOG. 2007 Sep;114(9):1079-87 - PubMed
16. Lancet. 2001 Dec 15;358(9298):2074-7 - PubMed
17. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Apr;89 Suppl 1:S7-24 - PubMed
18. Stud Fam Plann. 1989 Mar-Apr;20(2):81-95 - PubMed
19. Rural Demogr. 1981;8(1):29-51 - PubMed
20. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;196(4):297-308 - PubMed
21. JAMA. 2006 Apr 19;295(15):1809-23 - PubMed
22. Soc Biol. 1978 Fall;25(3):251-7 - PubMed
23. N Engl J Med. 1999 Feb 25;340(8):589-94 - PubMed
24. BMJ. 2000 Jun 24;320(7251):1708-12 - PubMed
25. J Nutr. 2003 May;133(5 Suppl 2):1732S-1736S - PubMed
26. Soc Biol. 1989 Fall-Winter;36(3-4):186-212 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article