Display options
Share it on

Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2014 Nov 20;10:977-83. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S58367. eCollection 2014.

Current perspectives on bisphosphonate treatment in Paget's disease of bone.

Therapeutics and clinical risk management

Winnie Zee Man Wat

Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong.

PMID: 25429226 PMCID: PMC4242688 DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S58367

Abstract

Paget's disease of bone is a chronic metabolic bone disease with focal increase in bone turnover. The exact etiology of the disease is uncertain, although genetic and environmental factors are believed to be important. Bisphosphonate is the main class of medication being used to control disease activity via its antiresorptive effect. This review discusses the controversies concerning the use of bisphosphonates in the treatment of Paget's disease of bone, the efficacy of different bisphosphonates in controlling disease activity, and the possible rare side effects of bisphosphonates. Symptoms are the main indication for treatment in Paget's disease of bone. As treatment benefits in asymptomatic individuals remain controversial and nonevidence based, the decision to treat these patients should be individualized to their risk and benefit profiles. There are several trials conducted to evaluate and compare the efficacy of different regimes of bisphosphonates for treating Paget's disease of bone. Most trials used biochemical markers rather than clinical symptoms or outcomes as parameters for comparison. Zoledronate is an attractive option as it can achieve high rates of biochemical remission and sustain long duration of suppression by a single dose. Atypical femoral fracture and osteonecrosis of the jaw are two rare and severe side effects reported, possibly related to the use of bisphosphonates in patients with osteoporosis and malignancy-induced hypercalcemia. As the regimes of bisphosphonates used for treating Paget's disease of bone are different from those two diseases, the risks of developing these two possible side effects are expected to be very low, although this remains unknown. Vitamin D and calcium supplement should be given to patients at risk of vitamin D insufficiency when given zoledronate, as symptomatic hypocalcemia may develop. For those intolerant of bisphosphonates, subcutaneous calcitonin can be used for a limited period due to its associated risk of malignancy.

Keywords: alkaline phosphatase; antiresorptive; osteitis deformans

References

  1. J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Oct;22(10):1510-7 - PubMed
  2. Am J Med. 1999 May;106(5):513-20 - PubMed
  3. J Bone Miner Res. 1994 Jan;9(1):11-6 - PubMed
  4. J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Jan;22(1):142-8 - PubMed
  5. Arthritis Rheum. 1980 Oct;23 (10 ):1205-14 - PubMed
  6. J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Oct;22(10):1479-91 - PubMed
  7. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996 Mar;81(3):961-7 - PubMed
  8. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988 Sep;67(3):541-5 - PubMed
  9. J Med Chem. 2002 Aug 15;45(17):3721-38 - PubMed
  10. Histopathology. 1980 Jan;4(1):63-74 - PubMed
  11. J Bone Miner Res. 2000 Dec;15(12 ):2315-29 - PubMed
  12. J Bone Miner Res. 1991 Nov;6(11):1243-8 - PubMed
  13. Med Chir Trans. 1877;60:37-64.9 - PubMed
  14. J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Jun;24(6):1095-102 - PubMed
  15. Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Jan;41(1):75-81 - PubMed
  16. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003 Dec;17(6):1019-41 - PubMed
  17. J Bone Miner Res. 2006 Oct;21(10 ):1545-9 - PubMed
  18. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Aug;98(8):3121-6 - PubMed
  19. Bone Miner. 1992 Nov;19(2):159-74 - PubMed
  20. J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Jun;25(6):1463-4; author reply 1465-6 - PubMed
  21. Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):753-61 - PubMed
  22. Eur J Intern Med. 2013 Dec;24(8):691-7 - PubMed
  23. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1997 Jul;9(4):347-54 - PubMed
  24. N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 20;358(12 ):1304-6 - PubMed
  25. Biochem Soc Trans. 2008 Jun;36(Pt 3):469-71 - PubMed
  26. Injury. 2008 Feb;39(2):224-31 - PubMed
  27. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jun 25;172(12 ):930-6 - PubMed
  28. J Bone Miner Res. 2000 Mar;15(3):461-5 - PubMed
  29. J Bone Miner Res. 2006 Dec;21 Suppl 2:P14-21 - PubMed
  30. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jul 18;347(3):175-84 - PubMed
  31. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2009 Apr;1(2):107-25 - PubMed
  32. J Bone Miner Res. 2006 Dec;21 Suppl 2:P88-91 - PubMed
  33. Clin Chem. 2000 May;46(5):684-90 - PubMed
  34. Osteoporos Int. 2010 Mar;21(3):399-408 - PubMed
  35. Bone. 2004 Apr;34(4):747-54 - PubMed
  36. Dev Cell. 2004 Feb;6(2):303-9 - PubMed
  37. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Oct 9;285(6347):1005-8 - PubMed
  38. J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Dec;27(12 ):2544-50 - PubMed
  39. Compendium. 1990 Nov;11(11):662, 664-5, 668-9 - PubMed
  40. Bone. 1999 May;24(5 Suppl):11S-12S - PubMed
  41. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2007 Oct 01;9(27):1-13 - PubMed
  42. J Bone Miner Res. 2006 Jul;21(7):1136-45 - PubMed
  43. J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Jan;25(1):20-31 - PubMed
  44. BMJ. 1996 Feb 24;312(7029):491-4 - PubMed
  45. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1761-71 - PubMed
  46. Hong Kong Med J. 2013 Jun;19(3):242-8 - PubMed
  47. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 14;368(7):644-50 - PubMed
  48. Skeletal Radiol. 2006 Jun;35(6):350-1 - PubMed
  49. N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 1;353(9):898-908 - PubMed
  50. Bone. 2012 May;50(5):1023-5 - PubMed
  51. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Dec;95(12):5258-65 - PubMed
  52. JAMA. 2011 Feb 23;305(8):783-9 - PubMed
  53. Virchows Arch. 1994;424(1):99-104 - PubMed

Publication Types