Display options
Cite
Koganti SB, Kongara R, Boddepalli S, et al. Predictors of successful non-operative management of grade III & IV blunt pancreatic trauma. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016;10:103-9doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.08.003.
Koganti, S. B., Kongara, R., Boddepalli, S., Mohammad, N. S., Thumma, V., Nagari, B., & Sastry, R. A. (2016). Predictors of successful non-operative management of grade III & IV blunt pancreatic trauma. Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 10103-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.08.003
Koganti, Suman B, et al. "Predictors of successful non-operative management of grade III & IV blunt pancreatic trauma." Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) vol. 10 (2016): 103-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.08.003
Koganti SB, Kongara R, Boddepalli S, Mohammad NS, Thumma V, Nagari B, Sastry RA. Predictors of successful non-operative management of grade III & IV blunt pancreatic trauma. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 Aug 09;10:103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.08.003. eCollection 2016 Sep. PMID: 27594995; PMCID: PMC4995476.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 Aug 09;10:103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.08.003. eCollection 2016 Sep.

Predictors of successful non-operative management of grade III & IV blunt pancreatic trauma.

Annals of medicine and surgery (2012)

Suman B Koganti, Ravikanth Kongara, Sateesh Boddepalli, Naushad Shaik Mohammad, Venumadhav Thumma, Bheerappa Nagari, R A Sastry

Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Telangana (Andhra Pradesh), 500082, India.
  2. Department of Bio-statistics & Pharmacogenomics, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Telangana (Andhra Pradesh), 500082, India.

PMID: 27594995 PMCID: PMC4995476 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.08.003

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although surgery is the preferred treatment for grade III&IV pancreatic trauma, there is a growing movement for non-operative management. in blunt pancreatic trauma. Very few studies compare operative versus non-operative management in adult patients.

METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed from 2004 to 2013 in the department of gastrointestinal surgery, NIMS, Hyderabad. Comparative analysis was performed between patients who failed versus those who were successfully managed with non-operative management.

RESULTS: 34 patients had grade III/IV trauma out of which 8 were operated early with the remaining 26 initially under a NOM strategy, 10 of them could be successfully managed without any operation. Post-traumatic pancreatitis, Necrotizing pancreatitis, Ileus, contusion on CT, surrounding organ injuries are independently associated with failure of NOM on a univariate analysis. On multivariate logistic regression presence of necrosis& associated organ injury are factors that predict failure of NOM independently. Development of a pseudocyst is the only significant factor that is associated with a success of NOM.

CONCLUSIONS: Non-operative measures should be attempted in a select group of grade III&IV blunt pancreatic trauma. In hemodynamically stable patients with a controlled leak walled off as a pseudocyst without associated organ injuries and pancreatic necrosis, NOM has a higher success rate.

Keywords: AAST: American association for the surgery of trauma; ISGPF: International study group of pancreatic fistula; NOM: non-operative management

References

  1. Injury. 2001 Dec;32(10):753-9 - PubMed
  2. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002 Jul-Aug;6(4):587-98 - PubMed
  3. Dig Surg. 2003;20(5):408-14 - PubMed
  4. J Trauma. 2003 Nov;55(5):898-905 - PubMed
  5. Surgery. 2005 Jul;138(1):8-13 - PubMed
  6. Arch Surg. 1990 Sep;125(9):1109-13 - PubMed
  7. J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Feb;42(2):340-4 - PubMed
  8. J Trauma. 1991 Dec;31(12):1600-6 - PubMed
  9. Surgery. 2007 Jul;142(1):20-5 - PubMed
  10. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2007 Jul;17(3):559-79, vii - PubMed
  11. Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Dec;87(6):1515-32, x - PubMed
  12. Injury. 2009 Jan;40(1):61-5 - PubMed
  13. World J Surg. 2009 Aug;33(8):1611-7 - PubMed
  14. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1491-502 - PubMed
  15. HPB (Oxford). 2010 Apr;12(3):155-65 - PubMed
  16. S Afr J Surg. 2011 Apr;49(2):58, 60, 62-4 passim - PubMed
  17. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Oct;396(7):1067-76 - PubMed
  18. Ann Surg. 1990 Jun;211(6):724-8; discussion 728-30 - PubMed
  19. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011 Dec;17(6):613-7 - PubMed
  20. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jan;72(1):100-5 - PubMed
  21. Pancreas. 2013 Jan;42(1):76-87 - PubMed
  22. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Nov;73(5 Suppl 4):S288-93 - PubMed
  23. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Nov;73(5 Suppl 4):S294-300 - PubMed
  24. HPB (Oxford). 2014 Mar;16(3):275-81 - PubMed
  25. Injury. 2014 Jan;45(1):134-40 - PubMed
  26. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Dec;75(6):941-6 - PubMed
  27. Pancreatology. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6):605-9 - PubMed
  28. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 21;19(47):9003-11 - PubMed
  29. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29(7):1360-70 - PubMed
  30. BMJ Case Rep. 2014 Apr 30;2014:null - PubMed
  31. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jun;76(6):1362-6 - PubMed
  32. Injury. 2014 Sep;45(9):1401-8 - PubMed
  33. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Feb;9(2):167-75 - PubMed
  34. Dig Surg. 2015;32(3):196-207 - PubMed
  35. Chirurg. 2015 Jun;86(6):519-24 - PubMed
  36. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Jun;41(3):239-50 - PubMed
  37. Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2592-602 - PubMed
  38. Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 3):1222-6 - PubMed
  39. J Trauma. 1985 Aug;25(8):771-6 - PubMed
  40. Am J Surg. 1985 Dec;150(6):698-704 - PubMed
  41. Am Surg. 1995 Feb;61(2):125-8 - PubMed
  42. Am Surg. 1997 Jul;63(7):598-604 - PubMed
  43. J Trauma. 1997 Aug;43(2):234-9; discussion 239-41 - PubMed
  44. Ann Surg. 1998 Jun;227(6):861-9 - PubMed

Publication Types