Display options
Share it on

Crit Public Health. 2016;26(1):77-87. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2015.1077205. Epub 2015 Aug 19.

TRAP laws and the invisible labor of US abortion providers.

Critical public health

Rebecca J Mercier, Mara Buchbinder, Amy Bryant

Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia PA 19107 United States.
  2. Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 341A MacNider Hall CB 7240, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 United States.
  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4002 Old Clinic Building, CB 7570, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 United States.

PMID: 27570376 PMCID: PMC4999072 DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2015.1077205

Abstract

Targeted Regulations of Abortion Providers (TRAP laws) are proliferating in the United States and have increased barriers to abortion access. In order to comply with these laws, abortion providers make significant changes to facilities and clinical practices. In this article, we draw attention to an often unacknowledged area of public health threat: how providers adapt to increasing regulation, and the resultant strains on the abortion provider workforce. Current US legal standards for abortion regulations have led to an increase in laws that target abortion providers. We describe recent research with abortion providers in North Carolina to illustrate how providers adapt to new regulations, and how compliance with regulation leads to increased workload and increased financial and emotional burdens on providers. We use the concept of invisible labor to highlight the critical work undertaken by abortion providers not only to comply with regulations, but also to minimize the burden that new laws impose on patients. This labor provides a crucial bridge in the preservation of abortion access. The impact of TRAP laws on abortion providers should be included in the consideration of the public health impact of abortion laws.

Keywords: Abortion; health policy; invisible labor; reproductive health

References

  1. Contraception. 2010 Jun;81(6):525-30 - PubMed
  2. N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 20;365(16):1466-9 - PubMed
  3. Am J Public Health. 2009 Apr;99(4):623-30 - PubMed
  4. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Nov;73(9):1357-64 - PubMed
  5. Am J Public Health. 2013 Oct;103(10):1772-9 - PubMed
  6. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;119(2 Pt 1):215-9 - PubMed
  7. Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):162-70 - PubMed
  8. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):981-3 - PubMed
  9. Women Health. 2014;54(7):666-71 - PubMed
  10. Reprod Health Matters. 2010 Nov;18(36):136-46 - PubMed
  11. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;204(1):23.e1-4 - PubMed
  12. Univ PA Law Rev. 1989 Nov;138(1):119-55 - PubMed
  13. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Aug;183(2 Suppl):S84-94 - PubMed
  14. Contraception. 2015 Jun;91(6):507-12 - PubMed
  15. Lancet. 2006 Nov 25;368(9550):1908-19 - PubMed
  16. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Oct;73(7):1062-70 - PubMed
  17. J Health Econ. 2001 Nov;20(6):1011-32 - PubMed
  18. Contraception. 2006 Oct;74(4):334-44 - PubMed
  19. Boston Univ Law Rev. 1992 Sep;72(4):683-98 - PubMed
  20. Contraception. 2010 Aug;82(2):129-30 - PubMed
  21. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Apr;103(4):729-37 - PubMed
  22. Womens Health Issues. 2011 May-Jun;21(3 Suppl):S49-54 - PubMed
  23. JAMA. 1993 May 5;269(17):2249-57 - PubMed
  24. Contraception. 2013 Jan;87(1):11-6 - PubMed
  25. Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):73-4 - PubMed
  26. Am J Public Health. 2014 Sep;104(9):1687-94 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support