Display options
Share it on

Open Dent J. 2016 Aug 22;10:420-30. doi: 10.2174/1874210601610010420. eCollection 2016.

Are Pediatric Antibiotic Formulations Potentials Risk Factors for Dental Caries and Dental Erosion?.

The open dentistry journal

Ana Carolina Valinoti, Luiz Carlos da Costa, Adriana Farah, Valéria Pereira de Sousa, Andréa Fonseca-Gonçalves, Lucianne Cople Maia

Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ,Brazil.
  2. Systems and Computing Engineering, COPPE/ Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ,Brazil.
  3. Institute of Nutrition, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ,Brazil.
  4. Quality Control of Drugs and Medicines Laboratory, Department of Medicines, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ,Brazil.

PMID: 27583053 PMCID: PMC4995533 DOI: 10.2174/1874210601610010420

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: One of the most frequent parents' concerns is that oral antibiotic formulations induce dental damage in their children's. This study aimed to assess the cariogenic and erosive potentials of 29 pediatric antibiotics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Replicates of each antibiotic were analyzed for the concentration of sugars (sucrose, glucose and fructose) and sorbitol by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The pH was determined by digital pHmeter. Titratable acidity was determined in triplicate using the same pHmeter by gradual addition of 0.1N sodium hydroxide (NaOH) until pH 7.0. Viscosity measurements were carried out using a viscosimeter. In order to rank the relative performance of each medicine, the DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) methodology was used.

RESULTS: Sucrose was present in most samples (n=24) with concentrations ranging from 26 to ≈ 100g% (w/w). Only one antibiotic contained sorbitol (66.9g%). Twenty seven antibiotics presented pH values ranging from 4.1 to 6.9 and most of them (n=15) showed the pH below the critical value for dissolution of hydroxyapatite. The values of titratable acidity and viscosity ranged from 0.26 to 40.48 ml and from 20 to 1780cP, respectively. DEA methodology showed that two medicines were distant from the performance frontier (Klaricid(®) 50mg and Zinnat(®) 250mg), which means that these medicines showed the worst performance and, therefore, greater potential for dissolution of dental enamel.

CONCLUSION: Many antibiotics presented high concentration of sugars, high titratable acidity, pH below the critical value and high viscosity which can be considered risk factors for dental caries and erosion, when consumed frequently.

Keywords: Antibiotics; Dental caries; Pharmaceutical preparations; Sweetening agents; Tooth erosion; Viscosity

References

  1. Br Dent J. 1993 Aug 7;175(3):93-8 - PubMed
  2. Caries Res. 2004;38 Suppl 1:34-44 - PubMed
  3. Br J Sports Med. 1997 Mar;31(1):28-30 - PubMed
  4. Gen Dent. 2006 Jan-Feb;54(1):21-7 - PubMed
  5. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Sep;30(9):802-8 - PubMed
  6. Pediatrics. 1997 Feb;99(2):268-78 - PubMed
  7. N Z Dent J. 1997 Dec;93(414):124-9 - PubMed
  8. Pediatrics. 1981 Sep;68(3):416-9 - PubMed
  9. Br Dent J. 1985 Apr 20;158(8):293-6 - PubMed
  10. Dent Clin North Am. 2000 Jul;44(3):443-56 - PubMed
  11. Cien Saude Colet. 2007 Sep-Oct;12(5):1295-300 - PubMed
  12. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008 Spring;32(3):189-94 - PubMed
  13. Community Dent Health. 2005 Sep;22(3):180-3 - PubMed
  14. Cien Saude Colet. 2007 Jul-Aug;12(4):985-98 - PubMed
  15. Pharm World Sci. 2001 Jun;23(3):118-9 - PubMed
  16. Community Dent Health. 2010 Mar;27(1):46-51 - PubMed
  17. Caries Res. 1996;30(1):16-21 - PubMed
  18. Caries Res. 1992;26(4):310-4 - PubMed
  19. J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Jul;33(7):529-32 - PubMed
  20. J Can Dent Assoc. 1989 Jan;55(1):43-6 - PubMed
  21. Community Dent Health. 1994 Jun;11(2):91-6 - PubMed
  22. Aust Dent J. 1990 Jun;35(3):219-21 - PubMed
  23. Caries Res. 1989;23(6):412-6 - PubMed
  24. Pediatrician. 1989;16(3-4):153-5 - PubMed
  25. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008 Winter;32(2):133-7 - PubMed
  26. Odontol Revy. 1967;18(4):373-86 - PubMed
  27. Pediatr Dent. 1995 May-Jun;17(3):192-8 - PubMed
  28. J Dent. 2005 Aug;33(7):569-75 - PubMed
  29. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996 Apr;104(2 ( Pt 2)):199-206 - PubMed
  30. Monogr Oral Sci. 2006;20:112-8 - PubMed
  31. Caries Res. 1981;15(5):377-85 - PubMed
  32. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2002;13(2):126-31 - PubMed
  33. Int Dent J. 1998 Dec;48(6):529-39 - PubMed
  34. Dent Update. 1994 Jun;21(5):192-4 - PubMed
  35. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008 Jul-Aug;16(4):257-65 - PubMed
  36. Scand J Dent Res. 1988 Aug;96(4):324-33 - PubMed
  37. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1991;87(4):621-31 - PubMed
  38. Caries Res. 1995;29(6):470-6 - PubMed
  39. J Oral Rehabil. 1999 Dec;26(12):923-7 - PubMed
  40. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007 Jul;17(4):231-8 - PubMed
  41. Br J Nutr. 1989 Sep;62(2):451-64 - PubMed
  42. Caries Res. 1993;27(2):154-60 - PubMed
  43. Caries Res. 2006;40(3):218-23 - PubMed

Publication Types