Display options
Cite
Spiegel R. Stressed vs. unstressed volume and its relevance to critical care practitioners. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2016;3(1):52-54doi: 10.15441/ceem.16.128.
Spiegel, R. (2016). Stressed vs. unstressed volume and its relevance to critical care practitioners. Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 3(1), 52-54. https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.16.128
Spiegel, Rory. "Stressed vs. unstressed volume and its relevance to critical care practitioners." Clinical and experimental emergency medicine vol. 3,1 (2016): 52-54. doi: https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.16.128
Spiegel R. Stressed vs. unstressed volume and its relevance to critical care practitioners. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2016 Mar 31;3(1):52-54. doi: 10.15441/ceem.16.128. eCollection 2016 Mar. PMID: 27752616; PMCID: PMC5051617.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2016 Mar 31;3(1):52-54. doi: 10.15441/ceem.16.128. eCollection 2016 Mar.

Stressed vs. unstressed volume and its relevance to critical care practitioners.

Clinical and experimental emergency medicine

Rory Spiegel

Affiliations

  1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

PMID: 27752616 PMCID: PMC5051617 DOI: 10.15441/ceem.16.128

[No abstract available.]

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

  1. Physiol Rev. 1955 Jan;35(1):123-9 - PubMed
  2. Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):573-9 - PubMed
  3. Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):255-62 - PubMed

Publication Types