Gastroenterology Res. 2012 Dec;5(6):219-226. doi: 10.4021/gr488w. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: Development of the Severity Score.

Gastroenterology research

Rangson Chaikitamnuaychok, Jayanton Patumanond

PMID: 27785211 PMCID: PMC5074817 DOI: 10.4021/gr488w

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency endoscopy for every patient with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage is not possible in many medical centers. Simple guidelines to select patients for emergency endoscopy are lacking. The aim of the present report is to develop a simple scoring system to classify upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH) severity based on patient clinical profiles at the emergency departments.

METHODS: Retrospective data of patients with UGIH in a university affiliated hospital were analyzed. Patients were criterion-classified into 3 severity levels: mild, moderate and severe. Clinical and laboratory information were compared among the 3 groups. Significant parameters were selected as indicators of severity. Coefficients of significant multivariable parameters were transformed into item scores, which added up as individual severity scores. The scores were used to classify patients into 3 urgency levels: non-urgent, urgent and emergent groups. Score-classification and criterion-classification were compared.

RESULTS: Significant parameters in the model were age ≥ 60 years, pulse rate ≥ 100/min, systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg, hemoglobin < 10 g/dL, blood urea nitrogen ≥ 35 mg/dL, presence of cirrhosis and hepatic failure. The score ranged from 0 to 27, and classifying patients into 3 urgency groups: non-urgent (score < 4, n = 215, 21.2%), urgent (score 4 - 16, n = 677, 66.9%) and emergent (score > 16, n = 121, 11.9%). The score correctly classified 81.4% of the patients into their original (criterion-classified) severity groups. Under-estimation (7.5%) and over-estimation (11.1%) were clinically acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS: Our UGIH severity scoring system classified patients into 3 urgency groups: non-urgent, urgent and emergent, with clinically acceptable small number of under- and over-estimations. Its discriminative ability and precision should be validated before adopting into clinical practice.

Keywords: Clinical prediction rules; Gastrointestinal bleeding; Gastrointestinal hemorrhage; Gastroscopy; Prognostic indicators; Scoring system

References

1. Gut. 1999 Mar;44(3):331-5 - PubMed
2. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Dec;50(6):755-61 - PubMed
3. Lancet. 2000 Oct 14;356(9238):1318-21 - PubMed
4. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Jan;53(1):6-13 - PubMed
5. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Jun;53(7):853-8 - PubMed
6. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jan;55(1):1-5 - PubMed
7. Gut. 2002 Oct;51 Suppl 4:iv1-6 - PubMed
8. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Nov 18;139(10):843-57 - PubMed
9. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Oct;60(4):497-504 - PubMed
10. Postgrad Med J. 2006 Nov;82(973):757-9 - PubMed
11. World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Dec 28;12(48):7779-85 - PubMed
12. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Sep;22(9):1404-8 - PubMed
13. Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Sep;25(7):774-9 - PubMed
14. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;22(2):233-42 - PubMed
15. Lancet. 2009 Jan 3;373(9657):42-7 - PubMed
16. Gastrointest Endosc. 1990 Sep-Oct;36(5 Suppl):S8-13 - PubMed
17. Gastroenterology Res. 2012 Aug;5(4):149-155 - PubMed
18. Gastrointest Endosc. 1981 May;27(2):94-102 - PubMed
19. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995 Jun;41(6):561-5 - PubMed
20. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Apr;90(4):568-73 - PubMed
21. Gut. 1994 Jun;35(6):746-9 - PubMed
22. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993 Nov;88(11):1842-9 - PubMed
23. Lancet. 1996 Apr 27;347(9009):1138-40 - PubMed
24. Am J Med. 1996 Mar;100(3):313-22 - PubMed
25. Gut. 1996 Mar;38(3):316-21 - PubMed
26. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1996 Jun;22(4):267-71 - PubMed
27. Crit Care Med. 1997 Jul;25(7):1125-32 - PubMed
28. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 Mar;93(3):336-40 - PubMed
29. Med Care. 1998 Apr;36(4):462-74 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article