Display options
Cite
Wang TS, Christie N, Howe PD, et al. Global Cue Inconsistency Diminishes Learning of Cue Validity. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1743doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01743.
Wang, T. S., Christie, N., Howe, P. D., & Little, D. R. (2016). Global Cue Inconsistency Diminishes Learning of Cue Validity. Frontiers in psychology, 71743. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01743
Wang, Tony S L, et al. "Global Cue Inconsistency Diminishes Learning of Cue Validity." Frontiers in psychology vol. 7 (2016): 1743. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01743
Wang TS, Christie N, Howe PD, Little DR. Global Cue Inconsistency Diminishes Learning of Cue Validity. Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 11;7:1743. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01743. eCollection 2016. PMID: 27891105; PMCID: PMC5104735.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 11;7:1743. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01743. eCollection 2016.

Global Cue Inconsistency Diminishes Learning of Cue Validity.

Frontiers in psychology

Tony S L Wang, Nicole Christie, Piers D L Howe, Daniel R Little

Affiliations

  1. Cognitive, Linguistics and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence RI, USA.
  2. School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne VIC, Australia.

PMID: 27891105 PMCID: PMC5104735 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01743

Abstract

In daily life, we make decisions that are associated with probabilistic outcomes (e.g., the chance of rain today). People search for and utilize information that validly predicts an outcome (i.e., we look for dark clouds to indicate the possibility of rain). In the current study (

Keywords: exploitation; exploration; learning; probabilistic feedback; search behavior; selective attention

References

  1. J Math Psychol. 2009 Jun;53(3):180-193 - PubMed
  2. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Sep;144(1):73-82 - PubMed
  3. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Jan;7(1):43-48 - PubMed
  4. Dev Psychol. 2016 Feb;52(2):311-25 - PubMed
  5. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Mar;60(3):291-309 - PubMed
  6. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Sep;26(5):1332-46 - PubMed
  7. Cognition. 2008 Dec;109(3):416-22 - PubMed
  8. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Jan;26(1):53-76 - PubMed
  9. Psychol Sci. 2011 Jun;22(6):707-11 - PubMed
  10. Mem Cognit. 2006 Oct;34(7):1377-97 - PubMed
  11. Cogn Psychol. 2005 Dec;51(4):334-84 - PubMed
  12. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Sep;30(5):1065-81 - PubMed
  13. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 May 29;362(1481):933-42 - PubMed
  14. Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):751-61 - PubMed
  15. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 May;135(2):207-36 - PubMed
  16. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 May;37(3):720-38 - PubMed
  17. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992 Jun;121(2):222-36 - PubMed
  18. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Aug;64(8):1494-514 - PubMed
  19. Mem Cognit. 2006 Oct;34(7):1398-413 - PubMed
  20. Cogn Sci. 2009 May;33(3):530-41 - PubMed
  21. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jul;35(4):1041-61 - PubMed
  22. Cogn Psychol. 2005 Aug;51(1):1-41 - PubMed
  23. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):830-45 - PubMed
  24. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Aug;141(3):444-69 - PubMed
  25. Psychol Sci. 2005 Nov;16(11):852-5 - PubMed
  26. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Dec;8(12):1704-11 - PubMed
  27. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Nov;20(6):1264-82 - PubMed
  28. Cogn Sci. 2009 Jul;33(5):940-50 - PubMed
  29. Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Apr;32(2):183-98; discussion 198-246 - PubMed
  30. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 Sep;25(5):1083-119 - PubMed
  31. Cereb Cortex. 2003 Apr;13(4):400-8 - PubMed
  32. Nature. 2006 Jun 15;441(7095):876-9 - PubMed
  33. Physiol Behav. 2005 Dec 15;86(5):717-30 - PubMed
  34. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):185-96 - PubMed

Publication Types