Display options
Cite
Muglu J, Rather H, Arroyo-Manzano D, et al. Risks of stillbirth and neonatal death with advancing gestation at term: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of 15 million pregnancies. PLoS Med. 2019;16(7):e1002838doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002838.
Muglu, J., Rather, H., Arroyo-Manzano, D., Bhattacharya, S., Balchin, I., Khalil, A., Thilaganathan, B., Khan, K. S., Zamora, J., & Thangaratinam, S. (2019). Risks of stillbirth and neonatal death with advancing gestation at term: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of 15 million pregnancies. PLoS medicine, 16(7), e1002838. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002838
Muglu, Javaid, et al. "Risks of stillbirth and neonatal death with advancing gestation at term: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of 15 million pregnancies." PLoS medicine vol. 16,7 (2019): e1002838. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002838
Muglu J, Rather H, Arroyo-Manzano D, Bhattacharya S, Balchin I, Khalil A, Thilaganathan B, Khan KS, Zamora J, Thangaratinam S. Risks of stillbirth and neonatal death with advancing gestation at term: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of 15 million pregnancies. PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 02;16(7):e1002838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002838. eCollection 2019 Jul. PMID: 31265456; PMCID: PMC6605635.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 02;16(7):e1002838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002838. eCollection 2019 Jul.

Risks of stillbirth and neonatal death with advancing gestation at term: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of 15 million pregnancies.

PLoS medicine

Javaid Muglu, Henna Rather, David Arroyo-Manzano, Sohinee Bhattacharya, Imelda Balchin, Asma Khalil, Basky Thilaganathan, Khalid S Khan, Javier Zamora, Shakila Thangaratinam

Affiliations

  1. Women's and Sexual Health Division, University Hospital Lewisham, Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  2. Women's Division, North Middlesex University Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  3. Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Ramon y Cajal (IRYCIS) and CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
  4. Dugald Baird Centre for Research on Women's Health, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
  5. University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  6. Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  7. Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
  8. Barts Research Centre for Women's Health, Women's Health Research Unit, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
  9. Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

PMID: 31265456 PMCID: PMC6605635 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002838

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in healthcare, stillbirth rates remain relatively unchanged. We conducted a systematic review to quantify the risks of stillbirth and neonatal death at term (from 37 weeks gestation) according to gestational age.

METHODS AND FINDINGS: We searched the major electronic databases Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar (January 1990-October 2018) without language restrictions. We included cohort studies on term pregnancies that provided estimates of stillbirths or neonatal deaths by gestation week. We estimated the additional weekly risk of stillbirth in term pregnancies that continued versus delivered at various gestational ages. We compared week-specific neonatal mortality rates by gestational age at delivery. We used mixed-effects logistic regression models with random intercepts, and computed risk ratios (RRs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Thirteen studies (15 million pregnancies, 17,830 stillbirths) were included. All studies were from high-income countries. Four studies provided the risks of stillbirth in mothers of White and Black race, 2 in mothers of White and Asian race, 5 in mothers of White race only, and 2 in mothers of Black race only. The prospective risk of stillbirth increased with gestational age from 0.11 per 1,000 pregnancies at 37 weeks (95% CI 0.07 to 0.15) to 3.18 per 1,000 at 42 weeks (95% CI 1.84 to 4.35). Neonatal mortality increased when pregnancies continued beyond 41 weeks; the risk increased significantly for deliveries at 42 versus 41 weeks gestation (RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.86, p = 0.012). One additional stillbirth occurred for every 1,449 (95% CI 1,237 to 1,747) pregnancies that advanced from 40 to 41 weeks. Limitations include variations in the definition of low-risk pregnancy, the wide time span of the studies, the use of registry-based data, and potential confounders affecting the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest there is a significant additional risk of stillbirth, with no corresponding reduction in neonatal mortality, when term pregnancies continue to 41 weeks compared to delivery at 40 weeks.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015013785.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

  1. J Pediatr. 2009 Mar;154(3):358-62, 362.e1 - PubMed
  2. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jan;63(1):2-6 - PubMed
  3. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Oct;80(4):575-84 - PubMed
  4. JAMA. 2011 Dec 14;306(22):2469-79 - PubMed
  5. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;120(1):76-82 - PubMed
  6. BJOG. 2016 Jun;123(7):1071-4 - PubMed
  7. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2008 Nov;63(11):715-24 - PubMed
  8. Early Hum Dev. 2003 Feb;71(1):39-52 - PubMed
  9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct;199(4):421.e1-7 - PubMed
  10. BMJ Open. 2014 Aug 14;4(8):e005785 - PubMed
  11. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Apr;14(2):203-7 - PubMed
  12. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Dec;193(6):1923-35 - PubMed
  13. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Apr;178(4):726-31 - PubMed
  14. Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1088-101 - PubMed
  15. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1968 Jan;75(1):32-41 - PubMed
  16. Med Decis Making. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):706-12 - PubMed
  17. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD004945 - PubMed
  18. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Mar;97(3):237-44 - PubMed
  19. BMJ. 1995 Feb 18;310(6977):452-4 - PubMed
  20. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;122(6):1302 - PubMed
  21. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Feb;105(2):169-73 - PubMed
  22. BMJ. 1999 Jul 31;319(7205):287-8 - PubMed
  23. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 09;379(6):513-523 - PubMed
  24. BMJ. 2007 Apr 21;334(7598):833 - PubMed
  25. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;48(5):602-606 - PubMed
  26. Lancet. 1987 May 23;1(8543):1192-4 - PubMed
  27. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 May 27;15:123 - PubMed
  28. Semin Perinatol. 2011 Aug;35(4):221-33 - PubMed
  29. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2012;4(3):175-87 - PubMed
  30. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 14;(7):CD007058 - PubMed
  31. CMAJ. 2014 Jun 10;186(9):665-73 - PubMed
  32. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Oct;163(4 Pt 1):1222-30 - PubMed
  33. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Apr;79(4):547-53 - PubMed
  34. BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34 - PubMed
  35. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1956;35(2):136-63 - PubMed
  36. BMJ. 2012 May 10;344:e2838 - PubMed
  37. Am J Perinatol. 1994 Jul;11(4):267-72 - PubMed
  38. BJOG. 2015 Sep;122(10):1303-11 - PubMed
  39. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Feb;184(3):489-96 - PubMed
  40. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(6):663-8 - PubMed
  41. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;122(5):1139-40 - PubMed
  42. N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):813-22 - PubMed
  43. BMJ. 2016 Sep 06;354:i4353 - PubMed
  44. Lancet. 2016 Feb 13;387(10019):691-702 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types