Display options
Share it on

Biophys Physicobiol. 2016 Jul 14;13:127-134. doi: 10.2142/biophysico.13.0_127. eCollection 2016.

Conformational shift in the closed state of GroEL induced by ATP-binding triggers a transition to the open state.

Biophysics and physicobiology

Yuka Suzuki, Kei Yura

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Ochanomizu University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112-8610, Japan.
  2. Graduate School of Humanities and Sciences, Ochanomizu University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112-8610, Japan; Center for Informational Biology, Ochanomizu University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112-8610, Japan; National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan.

PMID: 27924266 PMCID: PMC5042161 DOI: 10.2142/biophysico.13.0_127

Abstract

We investigated the effect of ATP binding to GroEL and elucidated a role of ATP in the conformational change of GroEL. GroEL is a tetradecamer chaperonin that helps protein folding by undergoing a conformational change from a closed state to an open state. This conformational change requires ATP, but does not require the hydrolysis of the ATP. The following three types of conformations are crystalized and the atomic coordinates are available; closed state without ATP, closed state with ATP and open state with ADP. We conducted simulations of the conformational change using Elastic Network Model from the closed state without ATP targeting at the open state, and from the closed state with ATP targeting at the open state. The simulations emphasizing the lowest normal mode showed that the one started with the closed state with ATP, rather than the one without ATP, reached a conformation closer to the open state. This difference was mainly caused by the changes in the positions of residues in the initial structure rather than the changes in "connectivity" of residues within the subunit. Our results suggest that ATP should behave as an insulator to induce conformation population shift in the closed state to the conformation that has a pathway leading to the open state.

Keywords: adenosine triphosphate; elastic network model; insulator; population shift; protein conformational change

References

  1. Cell. 2001 Dec 28;107(7):869-79 - PubMed
  2. Curr Biol. 1993 May 1;3(5):265-73 - PubMed
  3. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):235-42 - PubMed
  4. Nature. 1991 Jul 4;352(6330):36-42 - PubMed
  5. Cell. 1995 Jul 28;82(2):231-9 - PubMed
  6. J Biol Chem. 2004 Oct 29;279(44):45737-43 - PubMed
  7. Proteins. 1998 Feb 1;30(2):144-54 - PubMed
  8. Phys Rev Lett. 1996 Aug 26;77(9):1905-1908 - PubMed
  9. Nature. 1997 Aug 21;388(6644):741-50 - PubMed
  10. J Mol Biol. 2003 Apr 4;327(4):843-55 - PubMed
  11. Biopolymers. 1983 Dec;22(12):2577-637 - PubMed
  12. Biophys J. 2008 Sep 15;95(6):2895-908 - PubMed
  13. Nature. 1989 Dec 21-28;342(6252):884-9 - PubMed
  14. J Am Chem Soc. 1966 Apr 5;88(7):1507-11 - PubMed
  15. Science. 1987 Mar 6;235(4793):1173-8 - PubMed
  16. Science. 2002 Mar 8;295(5561):1852-8 - PubMed
  17. J Mol Biol. 2009 Mar 27;387(2):390-406 - PubMed
  18. Biophysics (Nagoya-shi). 2013 Jan 18;9:1-12 - PubMed
  19. J Comput Chem. 2008 Jul 15;29(9):1460-5 - PubMed
  20. Biochemistry. 1993 Mar 16;32(10):2554-63 - PubMed
  21. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Apr;5(4):e1000360 - PubMed
  22. Nature. 1994 Oct 13;371(6498):578-86 - PubMed
  23. J Biol Chem. 2011 Feb 25;286(8):6733-41 - PubMed
  24. J Mol Biol. 2000 Sep 15;302(2):303-13 - PubMed

Publication Types