Display options
Cite
Montag C, Sindermann C, Becker B, et al. An Affective Neuroscience Framework for the Molecular Study of Internet Addiction. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1906doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01906.
Montag, C., Sindermann, C., Becker, B., & Panksepp, J. (2016). An Affective Neuroscience Framework for the Molecular Study of Internet Addiction. Frontiers in psychology, 71906. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01906
Montag, Christian, et al. "An Affective Neuroscience Framework for the Molecular Study of Internet Addiction." Frontiers in psychology vol. 7 (2016): 1906. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01906
Montag C, Sindermann C, Becker B, Panksepp J. An Affective Neuroscience Framework for the Molecular Study of Internet Addiction. Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 16;7:1906. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01906. eCollection 2016. PMID: 28018255; PMCID: PMC5159430.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 16;7:1906. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01906. eCollection 2016.

An Affective Neuroscience Framework for the Molecular Study of Internet Addiction.

Frontiers in psychology

Christian Montag, Cornelia Sindermann, Benjamin Becker, Jaak Panksepp

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm UniversityUlm, Germany; Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation/Center for Information in Medicine, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChengdu, China.
  2. Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University Ulm, Germany.
  3. Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation/Center for Information in Medicine, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu, China.
  4. Department of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University Pullman, WA, USA.

PMID: 28018255 PMCID: PMC5159430 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01906

Abstract

Internet addiction represents an emerging global health issue. Increasing efforts have been made to characterize risk factors for the development of Internet addiction and consequences of excessive Internet use. During the last years, classic research approaches from psychology considering personality variables as vulnerability factor, especially in conjunction with neuroscience approaches such as brain imaging, have led to coherent theoretical conceptualizations of Internet addiction. Although such conceptualizations can be valuable aid, the research field is currently lacking a comprehensive framework for determining brain-based and neurochemical markers of Internet addiction. The present work aims at providing a framework on the molecular level as a basis for future research on the neural and behavioral level, in order to facilitate a comprehensive neurobiological model of Internet addiction and its clinical symptomatology. To help establish such a molecular framework for the study of Internet addiction, we investigated in

Keywords: ANPS; GPIUS-2; Internet addiction; Panksepp; digital addiction; personality; primary emotional systems; smartphone addiction

References

  1. J Psychiatr Res. 2014 Nov;58:7-11 - PubMed
  2. Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Apr 1;67(7):692-4 - PubMed
  3. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e83558 - PubMed
  4. Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;7(1):20-6 - PubMed
  5. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015 Sep-Oct;6(5):409-17 - PubMed
  6. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 27;8:375 - PubMed
  7. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Jun;17(6):851-8 - PubMed
  8. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e21236 - PubMed
  9. BMC Res Notes. 2015 Aug 04;8:331 - PubMed
  10. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004 Oct;58(5):487-94 - PubMed
  11. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Sep;13(9):372-80 - PubMed
  12. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Sep 30;8:184 - PubMed
  13. Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Mar 15;61(6):731-3 - PubMed
  14. Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Mar 15;69(6):601-3 - PubMed
  15. Addict Biol. 2016 Mar;21(2):460-8 - PubMed
  16. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015 Mar 16;9:38 - PubMed
  17. Addiction. 2013 Jul;108(7):1186-7 - PubMed
  18. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2007 May 9;31(4):961-2 - PubMed
  19. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008 Oct;11(5):571-6 - PubMed
  20. Brain Cogn. 2003 Jun;52(1):97-105 - PubMed
  21. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 May;67(5):821-6 - PubMed
  22. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Dec;71:252-266 - PubMed
  23. Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 10;7:811 - PubMed
  24. Personal Ment Health. 2016 Nov;10 (4):261-273 - PubMed
  25. Psychol Assess. 2012 Jun;24(2):375-85 - PubMed
  26. Biol Psychol. 2012 Jan;89(1):107-11 - PubMed
  27. Asian J Psychiatr. 2015 Oct;17:56-60 - PubMed
  28. Brain Behav. 2011 Nov;1(2):109-18 - PubMed
  29. PLoS One. 2014 Oct 07;9(10):e109394 - PubMed
  30. Psychiatry Res. 2002 Dec 30;116(3):163-72 - PubMed
  31. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 21;11(3):e0151405 - PubMed
  32. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009 Apr;63(2):218-24 - PubMed
  33. Assessment. 2016 Jun 24;:null - PubMed
  34. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56936 - PubMed
  35. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:854524 - PubMed
  36. J Adolesc Health. 2007 Jul;41(1):93-8 - PubMed
  37. Conscious Cogn. 2005 Mar;14(1):30-80 - PubMed
  38. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2013;35(4):348-58 - PubMed
  39. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Jun;43:228-39 - PubMed
  40. Behav Brain Res. 2009 Sep 14;202(2):179-83 - PubMed
  41. Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Feb 15;61(4):498-503 - PubMed
  42. J Addict Med. 2007 Sep;1(3):133-8 - PubMed
  43. Alcohol Alcohol. 2001 Nov-Dec;36(6):584-7 - PubMed
  44. Rev Neurosci. 2013;24(2):167-90 - PubMed
  45. J Addict Med. 2012 Sep;6(3):191-5 - PubMed
  46. Neuroreport. 2011 Jun 11;22(8):407-11 - PubMed
  47. Neuroimage. 2016 Apr 1;129:224-32 - PubMed
  48. Addiction. 2010 Mar;105(3):556-64 - PubMed
  49. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2012 Nov-Dec;35(6):283-9 - PubMed
  50. Psychol Rep. 1996 Dec;79(3 Pt 1):899-902 - PubMed
  51. Addict Behav. 2017 Feb;65:137-146 - PubMed
  52. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Oct;35(9):1946-58 - PubMed
  53. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(2):215-38 - PubMed
  54. Eur J Radiol. 2011 Jul;79(1):92-5 - PubMed

Publication Types