How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?

Display options

Format

Share it on

Full text links

JP Alperin, CM Nieves, LA Schimanski, GE Fischman… - ELife, 2019 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?.

Geoscience Opportunities for Leadership in Diversity AND Program Evaluation

Alperin, Fischman

GSID: 9VUSAZtvi00J

Excerpt

Much of the work done by faculty at both public and private universities has significant public dimensions: it is often paid for by public funds; it is often aimed at serving the public good; and it is often subject to public evaluation. To understand how the public dimensions of faculty work are valued, we analyzed review, promotion, and tenure documents from a representative sample of 129 universities in the US and Canada. Terms and concepts related to public and community are mentioned in a large portion of documents, but mostly in …

Cited by

The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future.

Alperin JP.
LA Schimanski, JP Alperin - F1000Research, 2018 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
GSID: gWeTNQHZKhUJ

Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations.

Alperin JP, McKiernan EC, Niles MT.
MT Niles, LA Schimanski, EC McKiernan, JP Alperin - Plos one, 2020 - journals.plos.org
GSID: Vc2IbaF9qNEJ

Meta-research: Use of the journal impact factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations.

Matthias L, McKiernan EC.
EC McKiernan, LA Schimanski, CM Nieves, L Matthias… - Elife, 2019 - elifesciences.org
GSID: cIjHwxeudDEJ

How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?.

Excerpt

Similar articles

Cited by