Display options
Cite
King DG, Teague CT. Choice of electrode in electromyography of the external urethral and anal sphincters. J Urol. 1980;124(1):75-7doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55303-3.
King, D. G., & Teague, C. T. (1980). Choice of electrode in electromyography of the external urethral and anal sphincters. The Journal of urology, 124(1), 75-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55303-3
King, D G, and Teague, C T. "Choice of electrode in electromyography of the external urethral and anal sphincters." The Journal of urology vol. 124,1 (1980): 75-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55303-3
King DG, Teague CT. Choice of electrode in electromyography of the external urethral and anal sphincters. J Urol. 1980 Jul;124(1):75-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55303-3. PMID: 7411727.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Urol. 1980 Jul;124(1):75-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55303-3.

Choice of electrode in electromyography of the external urethral and anal sphincters.

The Journal of urology

D G King, C T Teague

PMID: 7411727 DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55303-3

Abstract

The needle, anal and catheter methods of performing simultaneous cystometry and pelvic floor electromyography were compared in 29 patients. Urethral sphincter electromyographic recordings consistently were satisfactory with a needle electrode, whereas the catheter surface electrode caused recording artifacts and was fragile. Anal sphincter electromyography was more reliable with a needle electrode than with an anal surface electrode.

MeSH terms

Publication Types