Display options
Cite
Cattell HE. Some comments on a factor analysis of the 16PF and the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised. Psychol Rep. 1995;77(3):1307-11doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.77.3f.1307.
Cattell, H. E. (1995). Some comments on a factor analysis of the 16PF and the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised. Psychological reports, 77(3), 1307-11. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.77.3f.1307
Cattell, H E. "Some comments on a factor analysis of the 16PF and the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised." Psychological reports vol. 77,3 (1995): 1307-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.77.3f.1307
Cattell HE. Some comments on a factor analysis of the 16PF and the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised. Psychol Rep. 1995 Dec;77(3):1307-11. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.77.3f.1307. PMID: 8643796.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on
Full text links
Atypon

Psychol Rep. 1995 Dec;77(3):1307-11. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.77.3f.1307.

Some comments on a factor analysis of the 16PF and the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised.

Psychological reports

H E Cattell

Affiliations

  1. Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Champaign, Illinois 61824-1188, USA.

PMID: 8643796 DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1995.77.3f.1307

Abstract

This paper comments on unusual results recently published by Byravan and Ramanaiah. Their factor analysis of the 16PF and the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised showed the scales of the two tests to be largely unrelated. However, two recent factor analyses of these tests show strong relationships between the two sets of global factors--as strong as between the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised five factors and Goldberg's big-five factors. Possible reasons for the discrepancy are discussed.

MeSH terms

Publication Types

LinkOut - more resources