Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 25 to 36 of 135 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
Harm reduction: Philosophical drivers of conceptual tensions and ways forward.

Nursing inquiry

Jiao S.
PMID: 30773745
Nurs Inq. 2019 Apr;26(2):e12286. doi: 10.1111/nin.12286. Epub 2019 Feb 17.

Of the various debates surrounding harm reduction, a conceptual tension that perhaps has the most relevance for the provision of services is that of harm reduction as a technical solution versus a contextualized social practice. The aim of this...

Cite
Jiao S. Harm reduction: Philosophical drivers of conceptual tensions and ways forward. Nurs Inq. 2019;26(2):e12286doi: 10.1111/nin.12286.
Jiao, S. (2019). Harm reduction: Philosophical drivers of conceptual tensions and ways forward. Nursing inquiry, 26(2), e12286. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12286
Jiao, Sunny. "Harm reduction: Philosophical drivers of conceptual tensions and ways forward." Nursing inquiry vol. 26,2 (2019): e12286. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12286
Jiao S. Harm reduction: Philosophical drivers of conceptual tensions and ways forward. Nurs Inq. 2019 Apr;26(2):e12286. doi: 10.1111/nin.12286. Epub 2019 Feb 17. PMID: 30773745.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
In search of our collective voice.

Nursing inquiry

Thorne S.
PMID: 30325099
Nurs Inq. 2018 Oct;25(4):e12266. doi: 10.1111/nin.12266.

No abstract available.

Cite
Thorne S. In search of our collective voice. Nurs Inq. 2018;25(4):e12266doi: 10.1111/nin.12266.
Thorne, S. (2018). In search of our collective voice. Nursing inquiry, 25(4), e12266. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12266
Thorne, Sally. "In search of our collective voice." Nursing inquiry vol. 25,4 (2018): e12266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12266
Thorne S. In search of our collective voice. Nurs Inq. 2018 Oct;25(4):e12266. doi: 10.1111/nin.12266. PMID: 30325099.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Getting something published? Or joining a conversation.

Nursing inquiry

Thorne S.
PMID: 24831433
Nurs Inq. 2014 Jun;21(2):91. doi: 10.1111/nin.12071.

No abstract available.

Cite
Thorne S. Getting something published? Or joining a conversation. Nurs Inq. 2014;21(2):91doi: 10.1111/nin.12071.
Thorne, S. (2014). Getting something published? Or joining a conversation. Nursing inquiry, 21(2), 91. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12071
Thorne, Sally. "Getting something published? Or joining a conversation." Nursing inquiry vol. 21,2 (2014): 91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12071
Thorne S. Getting something published? Or joining a conversation. Nurs Inq. 2014 Jun;21(2):91. doi: 10.1111/nin.12071. PMID: 24831433.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Trust and trustworthiness in nursing: an argument-based literature review.

Nursing inquiry

Dinç L, Gastmans C.
PMID: 22050646
Nurs Inq. 2012 Sep;19(3):223-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00582.x. Epub 2011 Nov 03.

Caring requires nurses to establish trusting relationships with patients and to be trustworthy professionals. This article provides insight into the conceptual understanding of trust and trustworthiness in nursing through an argument-based literature review of 17 articles published between 1980...

Cite
Dinç L, Gastmans C. Trust and trustworthiness in nursing: an argument-based literature review. Nurs Inq. 2011;19(3):223-37doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00582.x.
Dinç, L., & Gastmans, C. (2012). Trust and trustworthiness in nursing: an argument-based literature review. Nursing inquiry, 19(3), 223-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00582.x
Dinç, Leyla, and Gastmans, Chris. "Trust and trustworthiness in nursing: an argument-based literature review." Nursing inquiry vol. 19,3 (2012): 223-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00582.x
Dinç L, Gastmans C. Trust and trustworthiness in nursing: an argument-based literature review. Nurs Inq. 2012 Sep;19(3):223-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00582.x. Epub 2011 Nov 03. PMID: 22050646.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Response: to be or not to be? Nurse? Researcher? Or both?.

Nursing inquiry

Lawler J.
PMID: 7728596
Nurs Inq. 1995 Mar;2(1):57. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.1995.tb00064.x.

No abstract available.

Cite
Lawler J. Response: to be or not to be? Nurse? Researcher? Or both?. Nurs Inq. 1995;2(1):57doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.1995.tb00064.x.
Lawler, J. (1995). Response: to be or not to be? Nurse? Researcher? Or both?. Nursing inquiry, 2(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.1995.tb00064.x
Lawler, J. "Response: to be or not to be? Nurse? Researcher? Or both?." Nursing inquiry vol. 2,1 (1995): 57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.1995.tb00064.x
Lawler J. Response: to be or not to be? Nurse? Researcher? Or both?. Nurs Inq. 1995 Mar;2(1):57. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.1995.tb00064.x. PMID: 7728596.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Can nursing educators learn to trust the world's most trusted profession?.

Nursing inquiry

Darbyshire P, Thompson DR.
PMID: 33858032
Nurs Inq. 2021 Apr;28(2):e12412. doi: 10.1111/nin.12412. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

Nursing and nursing education face a paradox whereby the world's most trusted profession seems not to trust its own students and practitioners. Much of nursing education has adopted what has been memorably described as the 'cop shit' approach. This...

Cite
Darbyshire P, Thompson DR. Can nursing educators learn to trust the world's most trusted profession?. Nurs Inq. 2021;28(2):e12412doi: 10.1111/nin.12412.
Darbyshire, P., & Thompson, D. R. (2021). Can nursing educators learn to trust the world's most trusted profession?. Nursing inquiry, 28(2), e12412. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12412
Darbyshire, Philip, and Thompson, David R. "Can nursing educators learn to trust the world's most trusted profession?." Nursing inquiry vol. 28,2 (2021): e12412. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12412
Darbyshire P, Thompson DR. Can nursing educators learn to trust the world's most trusted profession?. Nurs Inq. 2021 Apr;28(2):e12412. doi: 10.1111/nin.12412. Epub 2021 Apr 15. PMID: 33858032.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Global Knowledge Gaps in Equitable Delivery of Chronic Edema Care: A Political Economy Case Study Analysis.

Lymphatic research and biology

Gibson L, Moffatt CJ, Narahari SR, Kabiri L, Ikhile D, Nchafack A, Dring E, Nursing D, Kousthubha SN, Gorry J.
PMID: 34672793
Lymphat Res Biol. 2021 Oct;19(5):447-459. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2021.0063.

No abstract available.

Cite
Gibson L, Moffatt CJ, Narahari SR, et al. Global Knowledge Gaps in Equitable Delivery of Chronic Edema Care: A Political Economy Case Study Analysis. Lymphat Res Biol. 2021;19(5):447-459doi: 10.1089/lrb.2021.0063.
Gibson, L., Moffatt, C. J., Narahari, S. R., Kabiri, L., Ikhile, D., Nchafack, A., Dring, E., Nursing, D., Kousthubha, S. N., & Gorry, J. (2021). Global Knowledge Gaps in Equitable Delivery of Chronic Edema Care: A Political Economy Case Study Analysis. Lymphatic research and biology, 19(5), 447-459. https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2021.0063
Gibson, Linda, et al. "Global Knowledge Gaps in Equitable Delivery of Chronic Edema Care: A Political Economy Case Study Analysis." Lymphatic research and biology vol. 19,5 (2021): 447-459. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2021.0063
Gibson L, Moffatt CJ, Narahari SR, Kabiri L, Ikhile D, Nchafack A, Dring E, Nursing D, Kousthubha SN, Gorry J. Global Knowledge Gaps in Equitable Delivery of Chronic Edema Care: A Political Economy Case Study Analysis. Lymphat Res Biol. 2021 Oct;19(5):447-459. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2021.0063. PMID: 34672793.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
The influence of engaging authentically on nurse-patient relationships: A scoping review.

Nursing inquiry

Pratt H, Moroney T, Middleton R.
PMID: 33166422
Nurs Inq. 2021 Apr;28(2):e12388. doi: 10.1111/nin.12388. Epub 2020 Nov 09.

The current international healthcare focus on ensuring the perspectives and needs of individual persons, families or communities are met has led to the core tenet of person-centred care for all. The nurse-patient relationship is central to the provision of...

Cite
Pratt H, Moroney T, Middleton R. The influence of engaging authentically on nurse-patient relationships: A scoping review. Nurs Inq. 2020;28(2):e12388doi: 10.1111/nin.12388.
Pratt, H., Moroney, T., & Middleton, R. (2021). The influence of engaging authentically on nurse-patient relationships: A scoping review. Nursing inquiry, 28(2), e12388. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12388
Pratt, Helen, et al. "The influence of engaging authentically on nurse-patient relationships: A scoping review." Nursing inquiry vol. 28,2 (2021): e12388. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12388
Pratt H, Moroney T, Middleton R. The influence of engaging authentically on nurse-patient relationships: A scoping review. Nurs Inq. 2021 Apr;28(2):e12388. doi: 10.1111/nin.12388. Epub 2020 Nov 09. PMID: 33166422.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Which lives are worth saving? Biolegitimacy and harm reduction during COVID-19.

Nursing inquiry

Larocque C, Foth T.
PMID: 33886134
Nurs Inq. 2021 Dec;28(4):e12417. doi: 10.1111/nin.12417. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

Despite the promise to save every life, the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed social and racial inequalities, precarious living conditions, and engendered an exponential increase in overdose deaths. Although some lives are considered sacred, others are deliberately sacrificed. This article...

Cite
Larocque C, Foth T. Which lives are worth saving? Biolegitimacy and harm reduction during COVID-19. Nurs Inq. 2021;28(4):e12417doi: 10.1111/nin.12417.
Larocque, C., & Foth, T. (2021). Which lives are worth saving? Biolegitimacy and harm reduction during COVID-19. Nursing inquiry, 28(4), e12417. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12417
Larocque, Catherine, and Foth, Thomas. "Which lives are worth saving? Biolegitimacy and harm reduction during COVID-19." Nursing inquiry vol. 28,4 (2021): e12417. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12417
Larocque C, Foth T. Which lives are worth saving? Biolegitimacy and harm reduction during COVID-19. Nurs Inq. 2021 Dec;28(4):e12417. doi: 10.1111/nin.12417. Epub 2021 Apr 22. PMID: 33886134; PMCID: PMC8250280.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
The objectivity and subjectivity of pain practices in older adults with dementia: A critical reflection.

Nursing inquiry

Carragher RM, MacLeod E, Camargo-Plazas P.
PMID: 33368898
Nurs Inq. 2021 Dec;28(4):e12397. doi: 10.1111/nin.12397. Epub 2020 Dec 24.

Providing nursing care for people with dementia residing in long-term care facilities poses specific challenges regarding pain practices. With underlying communication barriers unique to dementia pathologies, this population is often unable to communicate verbal sentiments and descriptions of pain....

Cite
Carragher RM, MacLeod E, Camargo-Plazas P. The objectivity and subjectivity of pain practices in older adults with dementia: A critical reflection. Nurs Inq. 2020;28(4):e12397doi: 10.1111/nin.12397.
Carragher, R. M., MacLeod, E., & Camargo-Plazas, P. (2021). The objectivity and subjectivity of pain practices in older adults with dementia: A critical reflection. Nursing inquiry, 28(4), e12397. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12397
Carragher, Rianne M, et al. "The objectivity and subjectivity of pain practices in older adults with dementia: A critical reflection." Nursing inquiry vol. 28,4 (2021): e12397. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12397
Carragher RM, MacLeod E, Camargo-Plazas P. The objectivity and subjectivity of pain practices in older adults with dementia: A critical reflection. Nurs Inq. 2021 Dec;28(4):e12397. doi: 10.1111/nin.12397. Epub 2020 Dec 24. PMID: 33368898.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Commentary on: 'A critical analysis of articles using a Gadamerian-based research method' (Fleming & Robb).

Nursing inquiry

Smythe E.
PMID: 30993815
Nurs Inq. 2019 Apr;26(2):e12287. doi: 10.1111/nin.12287.

No abstract available.

Cite
Smythe E. Commentary on: 'A critical analysis of articles using a Gadamerian-based research method' (Fleming & Robb). Nurs Inq. 2019;26(2):e12287doi: 10.1111/nin.12287.
Smythe, E. (2019). Commentary on: 'A critical analysis of articles using a Gadamerian-based research method' (Fleming & Robb). Nursing inquiry, 26(2), e12287. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12287
Smythe, Elizabeth. "Commentary on: 'A critical analysis of articles using a Gadamerian-based research method' (Fleming & Robb)." Nursing inquiry vol. 26,2 (2019): e12287. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12287
Smythe E. Commentary on: 'A critical analysis of articles using a Gadamerian-based research method' (Fleming & Robb). Nurs Inq. 2019 Apr;26(2):e12287. doi: 10.1111/nin.12287. PMID: 30993815.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Rediscovering the "Narrative" review.

Nursing inquiry

Thorne S.
PMID: 30003651
Nurs Inq. 2018 Jul;25(3):e12257. doi: 10.1111/nin.12257.

No abstract available.

Cite
Thorne S. Rediscovering the "Narrative" review. Nurs Inq. 2018;25(3):e12257doi: 10.1111/nin.12257.
Thorne, S. (2018). Rediscovering the "Narrative" review. Nursing inquiry, 25(3), e12257. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12257
Thorne, Sally. "Rediscovering the "Narrative" review." Nursing inquiry vol. 25,3 (2018): e12257. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12257
Thorne S. Rediscovering the "Narrative" review. Nurs Inq. 2018 Jul;25(3):e12257. doi: 10.1111/nin.12257. PMID: 30003651.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Showing 25 to 36 of 135 entries