Cite
Segi N, Nakashima H, Kanemura T, et al. Comparison of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach Vertebral Reconstruction Using a Rectangular Footplate Cage and Conventional Procedure Using a Cylindrical Footplate Cage for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture. J Clin Med. 2021;10(23)doi: 10.3390/jcm10235664.
Segi, N., Nakashima, H., Kanemura, T., Satake, K., Ito, K., Tsushima, M., Tanaka, S., Ando, K., Machino, M., Ito, S., Yamaguchi, H., Koshimizu, H., Tomita, H., Ouchida, J., Morita, Y., & Imagama, S. (2021). Comparison of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach Vertebral Reconstruction Using a Rectangular Footplate Cage and Conventional Procedure Using a Cylindrical Footplate Cage for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture. Journal of clinical medicine, 10(23), . https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235664
Segi, Naoki, et al. "Comparison of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach Vertebral Reconstruction Using a Rectangular Footplate Cage and Conventional Procedure Using a Cylindrical Footplate Cage for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture." Journal of clinical medicine vol. 10,23 (2021). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235664
Segi N, Nakashima H, Kanemura T, Satake K, Ito K, Tsushima M, Tanaka S, Ando K, Machino M, Ito S, Yamaguchi H, Koshimizu H, Tomita H, Ouchida J, Morita Y, Imagama S. Comparison of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach Vertebral Reconstruction Using a Rectangular Footplate Cage and Conventional Procedure Using a Cylindrical Footplate Cage for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture. J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 30;10(23). doi: 10.3390/jcm10235664. PMID: 34884365.
Copy
Download .nbib