Cite
Skottvoll FS, Berg HE, Bjørseth K, et al. Ultracentrifugation versus kit exosome isolation: nanoLC-MS and other tools reveal similar performance biomarkers, but also contaminations. Future Sci OA. 2018;5(1):FSO359doi: 10.4155/fsoa-2018-0088.
Skottvoll, F. S., Berg, H. E., Bjørseth, K., Lund, K., Roos, N., Bekhradnia, S., Thiede, B., Sandberg, C., Vik-Mo, E. O., Roberg-Larsen, H., Nyström, B., Lundanes, E., & Wilson, S. R. (2019). Ultracentrifugation versus kit exosome isolation: nanoLC-MS and other tools reveal similar performance biomarkers, but also contaminations. Future science OA, 5(1), FSO359. https://doi.org/10.4155/fsoa-2018-0088
Skottvoll, Frøydis Sved, et al. "Ultracentrifugation versus kit exosome isolation: nanoLC-MS and other tools reveal similar performance biomarkers, but also contaminations." Future science OA vol. 5,1 (2019): FSO359. doi: https://doi.org/10.4155/fsoa-2018-0088
Skottvoll FS, Berg HE, Bjørseth K, Lund K, Roos N, Bekhradnia S, Thiede B, Sandberg C, Vik-Mo EO, Roberg-Larsen H, Nyström B, Lundanes E, Wilson SR. Ultracentrifugation versus kit exosome isolation: nanoLC-MS and other tools reveal similar performance biomarkers, but also contaminations. Future Sci OA. 2018 Nov 09;5(1):FSO359. doi: 10.4155/fsoa-2018-0088. eCollection 2019 Jan. PMID: 30652024; PMCID: PMC6331754.
Copy
Download .nbib