Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 25 to 36 of 274 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
Patient choice? Some doctors still think they know best.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)

Vincent G.
PMID: 24020569
Nurs Stand. 2013 Sep 11-17;28(2):32. doi: 10.7748/ns2013.09.28.2.32.s48.

No abstract available.

Cite
Vincent G. Patient choice? Some doctors still think they know best. Nurs Stand. 2013;28(2):32doi: 10.7748/ns2013.09.28.2.32.s48.
Vincent, G. (2013). Patient choice? Some doctors still think they know best. Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987), 28(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2013.09.28.2.32.s48
Vincent, Gail. "Patient choice? Some doctors still think they know best." Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987) vol. 28,2 (2013): 32. doi: https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2013.09.28.2.32.s48
Vincent G. Patient choice? Some doctors still think they know best. Nurs Stand. 2013 Sep 11-17;28(2):32. doi: 10.7748/ns2013.09.28.2.32.s48. PMID: 24020569.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Fitting a Thurstonian IRT model to forced-choice data using Mplus.

Behavior research methods

Brown A, Maydeu-Olivares A.
PMID: 22733226
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):1135-47. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0217-x.

To counter response distortions associated with the use of rating scales (a.k.a. Likert scales), items can be presented in a comparative fashion, so that respondents are asked to rank the items within blocks (forced-choice format). However, classical scoring procedures...

Cite
Brown A, Maydeu-Olivares A. Fitting a Thurstonian IRT model to forced-choice data using Mplus. Behav Res Methods. 2012;44(4):1135-47doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0217-x.
Brown, A., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2012). Fitting a Thurstonian IRT model to forced-choice data using Mplus. Behavior research methods, 44(4), 1135-47. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0217-x
Brown, Anna, and Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto. "Fitting a Thurstonian IRT model to forced-choice data using Mplus." Behavior research methods vol. 44,4 (2012): 1135-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0217-x
Brown A, Maydeu-Olivares A. Fitting a Thurstonian IRT model to forced-choice data using Mplus. Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):1135-47. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0217-x. PMID: 22733226.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
From decision making to choice making: Part 1.

Hospital technology series

Ronning PL.
PMID: 10169074
Hosp Technol Ser. 1997 Jun;16(7):9-10.

No abstract available.

Cite
Ronning PL. From decision making to choice making: Part 1. Hosp Technol Ser. 1997;16(7):9-10
Ronning, P. L. (1997). From decision making to choice making: Part 1. Hospital technology series, 16(7), 9-10.
Ronning, P L. "From decision making to choice making: Part 1." Hospital technology series vol. 16,7 (1997): 9-10.
Ronning PL. From decision making to choice making: Part 1. Hosp Technol Ser. 1997 Jun;16(7):9-10. PMID: 10169074.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
An organizational model of choice: a theoretical analysis differentiating choice, personal control, and self-determination.

Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs

Williams S.
PMID: 9848266
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 1998 Nov;124(4):465-91.

Individuals experience choice when they select one option from among meaningful alternatives that possess relatively equal attractiveness and some degree of indeterminacy. Choice has been found to influence important psychological and behavioral outcomes. After differentiating among choice, personal control,...

Cite
Williams S. An organizational model of choice: a theoretical analysis differentiating choice, personal control, and self-determination. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 1998;124(4):465-91
Williams, S. (1998). An organizational model of choice: a theoretical analysis differentiating choice, personal control, and self-determination. Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs, 124(4), 465-91.
Williams, S. "An organizational model of choice: a theoretical analysis differentiating choice, personal control, and self-determination." Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs vol. 124,4 (1998): 465-91.
Williams S. An organizational model of choice: a theoretical analysis differentiating choice, personal control, and self-determination. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 1998 Nov;124(4):465-91. PMID: 9848266.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Apples & Oranges - How to Compare Job Offers.

Delaware medical journal

Armon B.
PMID: 29693820
Del Med J. 2017 Feb;89(2):58-61.

No abstract available.

Cite
Armon B. Apples & Oranges - How to Compare Job Offers. Del Med J. 2017;89(2):58-61
Armon, B. (2017). Apples & Oranges - How to Compare Job Offers. Delaware medical journal, 89(2), 58-61.
Armon, Bruce. "Apples & Oranges - How to Compare Job Offers." Delaware medical journal vol. 89,2 (2017): 58-61.
Armon B. Apples & Oranges - How to Compare Job Offers. Del Med J. 2017 Feb;89(2):58-61. PMID: 29693820.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
A new item response theory model to adjust data allowing examinee choice.

PloS one

Pena CS, Costa MA, Braga Oliveira RP.
PMID: 29389996
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 01;13(2):e0191600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191600. eCollection 2018.

In a typical questionnaire testing situation, examinees are not allowed to choose which items they answer because of a technical issue in obtaining satisfactory statistical estimates of examinee ability and item difficulty. This paper introduces a new item response...

Cite
Pena CS, Costa MA, Braga Oliveira RP. A new item response theory model to adjust data allowing examinee choice. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0191600doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191600.
Pena, C. S., Costa, M. A., & Braga Oliveira, R. P. (2018). A new item response theory model to adjust data allowing examinee choice. PloS one, 13(2), e0191600. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191600
Pena, Carolina Silva, et al. "A new item response theory model to adjust data allowing examinee choice." PloS one vol. 13,2 (2018): e0191600. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191600
Pena CS, Costa MA, Braga Oliveira RP. A new item response theory model to adjust data allowing examinee choice. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 01;13(2):e0191600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191600. eCollection 2018. PMID: 29389996; PMCID: PMC5794135.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Behavioral Economics: A New Lens for Understanding Genomic Decision Making.

Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing

Moore SE, Ulbrich HH, Hepburn K, Holaday B, Mayo R, Sharp J, Pruitt RH.
PMID: 29689133
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018 May;50(3):241-248. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12379. Epub 2018 Apr 24.

PURPOSE: This article seeks to take the next step in examining the insights that nurses and other healthcare providers can derive from applying behavioral economic concepts to support genomic decision making. As genomic science continues to permeate clinical practice,...

Cite
Moore SE, Ulbrich HH, Hepburn K, et al. Behavioral Economics: A New Lens for Understanding Genomic Decision Making. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018;50(3):241-248doi: 10.1111/jnu.12379.
Moore, S. E., Ulbrich, H. H., Hepburn, K., Holaday, B., Mayo, R., Sharp, J., & Pruitt, R. H. (2018). Behavioral Economics: A New Lens for Understanding Genomic Decision Making. Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 50(3), 241-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12379
Moore, Scott Emory, et al. "Behavioral Economics: A New Lens for Understanding Genomic Decision Making." Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing vol. 50,3 (2018): 241-248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12379
Moore SE, Ulbrich HH, Hepburn K, Holaday B, Mayo R, Sharp J, Pruitt RH. Behavioral Economics: A New Lens for Understanding Genomic Decision Making. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018 May;50(3):241-248. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12379. Epub 2018 Apr 24. PMID: 29689133; PMCID: PMC5945317.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Patient choice and provider competition - Quality enhancing drivers in primary care?.

Social science & medicine (1982)

Vengberg S, Fredriksson M, Winblad U.
PMID: 30878640
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:217-224. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.042. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

Patient choice of provider and provider competition have been introduced with the claim that they would lead to improved quality. For this to occur, certain conditions must be fulfilled on both the demand and the supply side. However, supply...

Cite
Vengberg S, Fredriksson M, Winblad U. Patient choice and provider competition - Quality enhancing drivers in primary care?. Soc Sci Med. 2019;226:217-224doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.042.
Vengberg, S., Fredriksson, M., & Winblad, U. (2019). Patient choice and provider competition - Quality enhancing drivers in primary care?. Social science & medicine (1982), 226217-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.042
Vengberg, Sofie, et al. "Patient choice and provider competition - Quality enhancing drivers in primary care?." Social science & medicine (1982) vol. 226 (2019): 217-224. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.042
Vengberg S, Fredriksson M, Winblad U. Patient choice and provider competition - Quality enhancing drivers in primary care?. Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:217-224. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.042. Epub 2019 Jan 29. PMID: 30878640.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Selecting a Medical School Advisor.

The Journal of emergency medicine

Lareau S, Blumstein H, Hopson L, Keller BL, Haydel MJ, Cheaito MA, Hitti EA, Epter M, Kazzi A.
PMID: 30833021
J Emerg Med. 2019 May;56(5):e91-e93. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Mar 01.

Having an advisor offers medical students many advantages, including increased likelihood of matching into their top choices. Interestingly, students who choose emergency medicine (EM) as a specialty are more likely to seek advising. However, finding and optimally utilizing an...

Cite
Lareau S, Blumstein H, Hopson L, et al. Selecting a Medical School Advisor. J Emerg Med. 2019;56(5):e91-e93doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.01.011.
Lareau, S., Blumstein, H., Hopson, L., Keller, B. L., Haydel, M. J., Cheaito, M. A., Hitti, E. A., Epter, M., & Kazzi, A. (2019). Selecting a Medical School Advisor. The Journal of emergency medicine, 56(5), e91-e93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.01.011
Lareau, Stephanie, et al. "Selecting a Medical School Advisor." The Journal of emergency medicine vol. 56,5 (2019): e91-e93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.01.011
Lareau S, Blumstein H, Hopson L, Keller BL, Haydel MJ, Cheaito MA, Hitti EA, Epter M, Kazzi A. Selecting a Medical School Advisor. J Emerg Med. 2019 May;56(5):e91-e93. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Mar 01. PMID: 30833021.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Nudging and Boosting: Steering or Empowering Good Decisions.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science

Hertwig R, Grüne-Yanoff T.
PMID: 28792862
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):973-986. doi: 10.1177/1745691617702496. Epub 2017 Aug 09.

In recent years, policy makers worldwide have begun to acknowledge the potential value of insights from psychology and behavioral economics into how people make decisions. These insights can inform the design of nonregulatory and nonmonetary policy interventions-as well as...

Cite
Hertwig R, Grüne-Yanoff T. Nudging and Boosting: Steering or Empowering Good Decisions. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017;12(6):973-986doi: 10.1177/1745691617702496.
Hertwig, R., & Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2017). Nudging and Boosting: Steering or Empowering Good Decisions. Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 12(6), 973-986. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617702496
Hertwig, Ralph, and Grüne-Yanoff, Till. "Nudging and Boosting: Steering or Empowering Good Decisions." Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science vol. 12,6 (2017): 973-986. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617702496
Hertwig R, Grüne-Yanoff T. Nudging and Boosting: Steering or Empowering Good Decisions. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):973-986. doi: 10.1177/1745691617702496. Epub 2017 Aug 09. PMID: 28792862.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Many faces of rationality: Implications of the great rationality debate for clinical decision-making.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice

Djulbegovic B, Elqayam S.
PMID: 28730671
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Oct;23(5):915-922. doi: 10.1111/jep.12788. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

Given that more than 30% of healthcare costs are wasted on inappropriate care, suboptimal care is increasingly connected to the quality of medical decisions. It has been argued that personal decisions are the leading cause of death, and 80%...

Cite
Djulbegovic B, Elqayam S. Many faces of rationality: Implications of the great rationality debate for clinical decision-making. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23(5):915-922doi: 10.1111/jep.12788.
Djulbegovic, B., & Elqayam, S. (2017). Many faces of rationality: Implications of the great rationality debate for clinical decision-making. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 23(5), 915-922. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12788
Djulbegovic, Benjamin, and Elqayam, Shira. "Many faces of rationality: Implications of the great rationality debate for clinical decision-making." Journal of evaluation in clinical practice vol. 23,5 (2017): 915-922. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12788
Djulbegovic B, Elqayam S. Many faces of rationality: Implications of the great rationality debate for clinical decision-making. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Oct;23(5):915-922. doi: 10.1111/jep.12788. Epub 2017 Jul 20. PMID: 28730671; PMCID: PMC5655784.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
[GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction.].

Recenti progressi in medicina

Morgano GP, Amato L, Parmelli E, Moja L, Davoli M, Schünemann H.
PMID: 29105695
Recenti Prog Med. 2017 Oct;108(10):402-424. doi: 10.1701/2802.28354.

Following the development of a unifying and transparent approach to grading the certainty of evidence and strength or recommendations, the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Working Group has refined its process of moving from Evidence to...

Cite
Morgano GP, Amato L, Parmelli E, et al. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework: un approccio sistematico e trasparente per prendere decisioni informate in ambito sanitario. 1: Introduzione. [GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction.]. Recenti Prog Med. 2017;108(10):402-424doi: 10.1701/2802.28354.
Morgano, G. P., Amato, L., Parmelli, E., Moja, L., Davoli, M., & Schünemann, H. (2017). GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework: un approccio sistematico e trasparente per prendere decisioni informate in ambito sanitario. 1: Introduzione. [GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction.]. Recenti progressi in medicina, 108(10), 402-424. https://doi.org/10.1701/2802.28354
Morgano, Gian Paolo, et al. "GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework: un approccio sistematico e trasparente per prendere decisioni informate in ambito sanitario. 1: Introduzione." [GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction.]. Recenti progressi in medicina vol. 108,10 (2017): 402-424. doi: https://doi.org/10.1701/2802.28354
Morgano GP, Amato L, Parmelli E, Moja L, Davoli M, Schünemann H. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework: un approccio sistematico e trasparente per prendere decisioni informate in ambito sanitario. 1: Introduzione. [GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction.]. Recenti Prog Med. 2017 Oct;108(10):402-424. doi: 10.1701/2802.28354. Italian. PMID: 29105695.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Showing 25 to 36 of 274 entries