Cite
Pollock A, Brady MC, Farmer SE, et al. The purpose of rating quality of evidence differs in an overview, as compared to guidelines or recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;74:238-40doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.001.
Pollock, A., Brady, M. C., Farmer, S. E., Langhorne, P., Mead, G. E., Mehrholz, J., Wiffen, P. J., & van Wijck, F. (2016). The purpose of rating quality of evidence differs in an overview, as compared to guidelines or recommendations. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 74238-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.001
Pollock, Alex, et al. "The purpose of rating quality of evidence differs in an overview, as compared to guidelines or recommendations." Journal of clinical epidemiology vol. 74 (2016): 238-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.001
Pollock A, Brady MC, Farmer SE, Langhorne P, Mead GE, Mehrholz J, Wiffen PJ, van Wijck F. The purpose of rating quality of evidence differs in an overview, as compared to guidelines or recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:238-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 06. PMID: 26769255.
Copy
Download .nbib