Cite
Bansal RK, Choudhary NS, Puri R, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration by capillary action, suction, and no suction methods: a randomized blinded study. Endosc Int Open. 2017;5(10):E980-E984doi: 10.1055/s-0043-116383.
Bansal, R. K., Choudhary, N. S., Puri, R., Patle, S. K., Bhagat, S., Nasa, M., Bhasin, A., Sarin, H., Guleria, M., & Sud, R. (2017). Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration by capillary action, suction, and no suction methods: a randomized blinded study. Endoscopy international open, 5(10), E980-E984. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-116383
Bansal, Rinkesh K, et al. "Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration by capillary action, suction, and no suction methods: a randomized blinded study." Endoscopy international open vol. 5,10 (2017): E980-E984. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-116383
Bansal RK, Choudhary NS, Puri R, Patle SK, Bhagat S, Nasa M, Bhasin A, Sarin H, Guleria M, Sud R. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration by capillary action, suction, and no suction methods: a randomized blinded study. Endosc Int Open. 2017 Oct;5(10):E980-E984. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-116383. Epub 2017 Oct 04. PMID: 28983505; PMCID: PMC5628048.
Copy
Download .nbib