Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 1 to 8 of 8 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
Experience-based utility and own health state valuation for a health state classification system: why and how to do it.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care

Brazier J, Rowen D, Karimi M, Peasgood T, Tsuchiya A, Ratcliffe J.
PMID: 29022120
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Jul;19(6):881-891. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0931-5. Epub 2017 Oct 11.

In the estimation of population value sets for health state classification systems such as the EuroQOL five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D), there is increasing interest in asking respondents to value their own health state, sometimes referred to as "experience-based utility...

Cite
Brazier J, Rowen D, Karimi M, et al. Experience-based utility and own health state valuation for a health state classification system: why and how to do it. Eur J Health Econ. 2017;19(6):881-891doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0931-5.
Brazier, J., Rowen, D., Karimi, M., Peasgood, T., Tsuchiya, A., & Ratcliffe, J. (2018). Experience-based utility and own health state valuation for a health state classification system: why and how to do it. The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 19(6), 881-891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-017-0931-5
Brazier, John, et al. "Experience-based utility and own health state valuation for a health state classification system: why and how to do it." The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care vol. 19,6 (2018): 881-891. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-017-0931-5
Brazier J, Rowen D, Karimi M, Peasgood T, Tsuchiya A, Ratcliffe J. Experience-based utility and own health state valuation for a health state classification system: why and how to do it. Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Jul;19(6):881-891. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0931-5. Epub 2017 Oct 11. PMID: 29022120; PMCID: PMC6008352.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Performance and benefit as outcome measures following cochlear implantation in non-traditional adult candidates: a pilot study.

Cochlear implants international

Peasgood A, Brookes N, Graham J.
PMID: 18792150
Cochlear Implants Int. 2003 Dec;4(4):171-90. doi: 10.1179/cim.2003.4.4.171.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the reported benefit in quality of life (QoL) and audiological performance in a group of 'non-traditional' patients undergoing cochlear implantation, and compare the results with those of patients satisfying established criteria for implantation.DESIGN: Longitudinal retrospective observational...

Cite
Peasgood A, Brookes N, Graham J. Performance and benefit as outcome measures following cochlear implantation in non-traditional adult candidates: a pilot study. Cochlear Implants Int. 2003;4(4):171-90doi: 10.1179/cim.2003.4.4.171.
Peasgood, A., Brookes, N., & Graham, J. (2003). Performance and benefit as outcome measures following cochlear implantation in non-traditional adult candidates: a pilot study. Cochlear implants international, 4(4), 171-90. https://doi.org/10.1179/cim.2003.4.4.171
Peasgood, Alison, et al. "Performance and benefit as outcome measures following cochlear implantation in non-traditional adult candidates: a pilot study." Cochlear implants international vol. 4,4 (2003): 171-90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1179/cim.2003.4.4.171
Peasgood A, Brookes N, Graham J. Performance and benefit as outcome measures following cochlear implantation in non-traditional adult candidates: a pilot study. Cochlear Implants Int. 2003 Dec;4(4):171-90. doi: 10.1179/cim.2003.4.4.171. PMID: 18792150.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
What Is the Health and Well-Being Burden for Parents Living With a Child With ADHD in the United Kingdom?.

Journal of attention disorders

Peasgood T, Bhardwaj A, Brazier JE, Biggs K, Coghill D, Daley D, Cooper CL, De Silva C, Harpin V, Hodgkins P, Nadkarni A, Setyawan J, Sonuga-Barke EJS.
PMID: 32552265
J Atten Disord. 2021 Dec;25(14):1962-1976. doi: 10.1177/1087054720925899. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

No abstract available.

Cite
Peasgood T, Bhardwaj A, Brazier JE, et al. What Is the Health and Well-Being Burden for Parents Living With a Child With ADHD in the United Kingdom?. J Atten Disord. 2020;25(14):1962-1976doi: 10.1177/1087054720925899.
Peasgood, T., Bhardwaj, A., Brazier, J. E., Biggs, K., Coghill, D., Daley, D., Cooper, C. L., De Silva, C., Harpin, V., Hodgkins, P., Nadkarni, A., Setyawan, J., & Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S. (2021). What Is the Health and Well-Being Burden for Parents Living With a Child With ADHD in the United Kingdom?. Journal of attention disorders, 25(14), 1962-1976. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054720925899
Peasgood, Tessa, et al. "What Is the Health and Well-Being Burden for Parents Living With a Child With ADHD in the United Kingdom?." Journal of attention disorders vol. 25,14 (2021): 1962-1976. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054720925899
Peasgood T, Bhardwaj A, Brazier JE, Biggs K, Coghill D, Daley D, Cooper CL, De Silva C, Harpin V, Hodgkins P, Nadkarni A, Setyawan J, Sonuga-Barke EJS. What Is the Health and Well-Being Burden for Parents Living With a Child With ADHD in the United Kingdom?. J Atten Disord. 2021 Dec;25(14):1962-1976. doi: 10.1177/1087054720925899. Epub 2020 Jun 19. PMID: 32552265; PMCID: PMC8527548.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
What Is the Health and Well-Being Burden for Parents Living With a Child With ADHD in the United Kingdom?.

Journal of attention disorders

Peasgood T, Bhardwaj A, Brazier JE, Biggs K, Coghill D, Daley D, Cooper CL, De Silva C, Harpin V, Hodgkins P, Nadkarni A, Setyawan J, Sonuga-Barke EJS.
PMID: 32552265
J Atten Disord. 2021 Dec;25(14):1962-1976. doi: 10.1177/1087054720925899. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

No abstract available.

Cite
Peasgood T, Bhardwaj A, Brazier JE, et al. What Is the Health and Well-Being Burden for Parents Living With a Child With ADHD in the United Kingdom?. J Atten Disord. 2020;25(14):1962-1976doi: 10.1177/1087054720925899.
Peasgood, T., Bhardwaj, A., Brazier, J. E., Biggs, K., Coghill, D., Daley, D., Cooper, C. L., De Silva, C., Harpin, V., Hodgkins, P., Nadkarni, A., Setyawan, J., & Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S. (2021). What Is the Health and Well-Being Burden for Parents Living With a Child With ADHD in the United Kingdom?. Journal of attention disorders, 25(14), 1962-1976. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054720925899
Peasgood, Tessa, et al. "What Is the Health and Well-Being Burden for Parents Living With a Child With ADHD in the United Kingdom?." Journal of attention disorders vol. 25,14 (2021): 1962-1976. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054720925899
Peasgood T, Bhardwaj A, Brazier JE, Biggs K, Coghill D, Daley D, Cooper CL, De Silva C, Harpin V, Hodgkins P, Nadkarni A, Setyawan J, Sonuga-Barke EJS. What Is the Health and Well-Being Burden for Parents Living With a Child With ADHD in the United Kingdom?. J Atten Disord. 2021 Dec;25(14):1962-1976. doi: 10.1177/1087054720925899. Epub 2020 Jun 19. PMID: 32552265; PMCID: PMC8527548.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
An emerging framework for fully incorporating public involvement (PI) into patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Journal of patient-reported outcomes

Carlton J, Peasgood T, Khan S, Barber R, Bostock J, Keetharuth AD.
PMID: 31933005
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Jan 13;4(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0172-8.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely used in the United Kingdom (UK) and internationally to report and monitor patients' subjective assessments of their symptoms and functional status and also their quality of life. Whilst the importance of involving the...

Cite
Carlton J, Peasgood T, Khan S, et al. An emerging framework for fully incorporating public involvement (PI) into patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020;4(1):4doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0172-8.
Carlton, J., Peasgood, T., Khan, S., Barber, R., Bostock, J., & Keetharuth, A. D. (2020). An emerging framework for fully incorporating public involvement (PI) into patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 4(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-019-0172-8
Carlton, J, et al. "An emerging framework for fully incorporating public involvement (PI) into patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)." Journal of patient-reported outcomes vol. 4,1 (2020): 4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-019-0172-8
Carlton J, Peasgood T, Khan S, Barber R, Bostock J, Keetharuth AD. An emerging framework for fully incorporating public involvement (PI) into patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Jan 13;4(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0172-8. PMID: 31933005; PMCID: PMC6957651.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Protocol for the STAR (Sheffield Treatments for ADHD) project: an internal pilot study assessing the feasibility of the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design to test the effectiveness of interventions for children with ADHD.

Pilot and feasibility studies

Fibert P, Relton C, Peasgood T, Daley D.
PMID: 29511570
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Mar 02;4:61. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0250-3. eCollection 2018.

BACKGROUND: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common and growing problem and a leading cause of child referrals to Child and Adult Mental Health Services (CAMHS). It is a drain on resources across nationally funded support agencies and...

Cite
Fibert P, Relton C, Peasgood T, et al. Protocol for the STAR (Sheffield Treatments for ADHD) project: an internal pilot study assessing the feasibility of the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design to test the effectiveness of interventions for children with ADHD. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018;4:61doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0250-3.
Fibert, P., Relton, C., Peasgood, T., & Daley, D. (2018). Protocol for the STAR (Sheffield Treatments for ADHD) project: an internal pilot study assessing the feasibility of the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design to test the effectiveness of interventions for children with ADHD. Pilot and feasibility studies, 461. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0250-3
Fibert, Philippa, et al. "Protocol for the STAR (Sheffield Treatments for ADHD) project: an internal pilot study assessing the feasibility of the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design to test the effectiveness of interventions for children with ADHD." Pilot and feasibility studies vol. 4 (2018): 61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0250-3
Fibert P, Relton C, Peasgood T, Daley D. Protocol for the STAR (Sheffield Treatments for ADHD) project: an internal pilot study assessing the feasibility of the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design to test the effectiveness of interventions for children with ADHD. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Mar 02;4:61. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0250-3. eCollection 2018. PMID: 29511570; PMCID: PMC5834871.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Bone scinitigraphy in rhabdomyolysis associated with carnitine palmitoyl transferase deficiency.

NDT plus

Wong J, Peasegood J, Davenport A.
PMID: 25949444
NDT Plus. 2010 Aug;3(4):407-9. doi: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfq051. Epub 2010 Apr 13.

No abstract available.

Cite
Wong J, Peasegood J, Davenport A. Bone scinitigraphy in rhabdomyolysis associated with carnitine palmitoyl transferase deficiency. NDT Plus. 2010;3(4):407-9doi: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfq051.
Wong, J., Peasegood, J., & Davenport, A. (2010). Bone scinitigraphy in rhabdomyolysis associated with carnitine palmitoyl transferase deficiency. NDT plus, 3(4), 407-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndtplus/sfq051
Wong, Jonathan, et al. "Bone scinitigraphy in rhabdomyolysis associated with carnitine palmitoyl transferase deficiency." NDT plus vol. 3,4 (2010): 407-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ndtplus/sfq051
Wong J, Peasegood J, Davenport A. Bone scinitigraphy in rhabdomyolysis associated with carnitine palmitoyl transferase deficiency. NDT Plus. 2010 Aug;3(4):407-9. doi: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfq051. Epub 2010 Apr 13. PMID: 25949444; PMCID: PMC4421534.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Criteria for item selection for a preference-based measure for use in economic evaluation.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation

Peasgood T, Mukuria C, Carlton J, Connell J, Brazier J.
PMID: 33289063
Qual Life Res. 2021 May;30(5):1425-1432. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02718-9. Epub 2020 Dec 07.

Preference-based measures allow patients to report their level of health, and the responses are then scored using preference weights from a representative general population sample for use in cost utility analysis. The development process of new preference-based measures should...

Cite
Peasgood T, Mukuria C, Carlton J, et al. Criteria for item selection for a preference-based measure for use in economic evaluation. Qual Life Res. 2020;30(5):1425-1432doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02718-9.
Peasgood, T., Mukuria, C., Carlton, J., Connell, J., & Brazier, J. (2021). Criteria for item selection for a preference-based measure for use in economic evaluation. Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 30(5), 1425-1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02718-9
Peasgood, Tessa, et al. "Criteria for item selection for a preference-based measure for use in economic evaluation." Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation vol. 30,5 (2021): 1425-1432. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02718-9
Peasgood T, Mukuria C, Carlton J, Connell J, Brazier J. Criteria for item selection for a preference-based measure for use in economic evaluation. Qual Life Res. 2021 May;30(5):1425-1432. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02718-9. Epub 2020 Dec 07. PMID: 33289063; PMCID: PMC8068712.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Showing 1 to 8 of 8 entries