Cite
Moyer P, Feldman J, Levine J, et al. Implications of the mechanical (PCI) vs thrombolytic controversy for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction on the organization of emergency medical services: the Boston EMS experience. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2004;3(2):53-61doi: 10.1097/01.hpc.0000128714.35330.6d.
Moyer, P., Feldman, J., Levine, J., Beshansky, J., Selker, H. P., Barnewolt, B., Brown, D. F., Cardoza, J. P., Grossman, S. A., Jacobs, A., Kerman, B. J., Kimmelstiel, C., Larson, R., Losordo, D., Pearlmutter, M., Pozner, C., Ramirez, A., Rosenfield, K., Ryan, T. J., Zane, R. D., & Cannon, C. P. (2004). Implications of the mechanical (PCI) vs thrombolytic controversy for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction on the organization of emergency medical services: the Boston EMS experience. Critical pathways in cardiology, 3(2), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hpc.0000128714.35330.6d
Moyer, Peter, et al. "Implications of the mechanical (PCI) vs thrombolytic controversy for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction on the organization of emergency medical services: the Boston EMS experience." Critical pathways in cardiology vol. 3,2 (2004): 53-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hpc.0000128714.35330.6d
Moyer P, Feldman J, Levine J, Beshansky J, Selker HP, Barnewolt B, Brown DF, Cardoza JP, Grossman SA, Jacobs A, Kerman BJ, Kimmelstiel C, Larson R, Losordo D, Pearlmutter M, Pozner C, Ramirez A, Rosenfield K, Ryan TJ, Zane RD, Cannon CP. Implications of the mechanical (PCI) vs thrombolytic controversy for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction on the organization of emergency medical services: the Boston EMS experience. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2004 Jun;3(2):53-61. doi: 10.1097/01.hpc.0000128714.35330.6d. PMID: 18340140.
Copy
Download .nbib