Cite
Verhaegh AJ, Accord RE, van Garsse L, et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization as a safe, feasible, and viable alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: what is the current evidence?. Minim Invasive Surg. 2013;2013:142616doi: 10.1155/2013/142616.
Verhaegh, A. J., Accord, R. E., van Garsse, L., & Maessen, J. G. (2013). Hybrid coronary revascularization as a safe, feasible, and viable alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: what is the current evidence?. Minimally invasive surgery, 2013142616. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/142616
Verhaegh, Arjan J F P, et al. "Hybrid coronary revascularization as a safe, feasible, and viable alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: what is the current evidence?." Minimally invasive surgery vol. 2013 (2013): 142616. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/142616
Verhaegh AJ, Accord RE, van Garsse L, Maessen JG. Hybrid coronary revascularization as a safe, feasible, and viable alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: what is the current evidence?. Minim Invasive Surg. 2013;2013:142616. doi: 10.1155/2013/142616. Epub 2013 Apr 03. PMID: 23691303; PMCID: PMC3649801.
Copy
Download .nbib