Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 1 to 12 of 34 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
Bias in double-blind trials.

Danish medical bulletin

Gøtzsche PC.
PMID: 2245657
Dan Med Bull. 1990 Aug;37(4):329-36.

No abstract available.

Cite
Gøtzsche PC. Bias in double-blind trials. Dan Med Bull. 1990;37(4):329-36
Gøtzsche, P. C. (1990). Bias in double-blind trials. Danish medical bulletin, 37(4), 329-36.
Gøtzsche, P C. "Bias in double-blind trials." Danish medical bulletin vol. 37,4 (1990): 329-36.
Gøtzsche PC. Bias in double-blind trials. Dan Med Bull. 1990 Aug;37(4):329-36. PMID: 2245657.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Evaluating the Pros and Cons of Different Peer Review Policies via Simulation.

Science and engineering ethics

Zhu J, Fung G, Wong WH, Li Z, Xu C.
PMID: 26169697
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Aug;22(4):1073-1094. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9683-8. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

In the academic world, peer review is one of the major processes in evaluating a scholars contribution. In this study, we are interested in quantifying the merits of different policies in a peer review process, such as single-blind review,...

Cite
Zhu J, Fung G, Wong WH, et al. Evaluating the Pros and Cons of Different Peer Review Policies via Simulation. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015;22(4):1073-1094doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9683-8.
Zhu, J., Fung, G., Wong, W. H., Li, Z., & Xu, C. (2016). Evaluating the Pros and Cons of Different Peer Review Policies via Simulation. Science and engineering ethics, 22(4), 1073-1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9683-8
Zhu, Jia, et al. "Evaluating the Pros and Cons of Different Peer Review Policies via Simulation." Science and engineering ethics vol. 22,4 (2016): 1073-1094. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9683-8
Zhu J, Fung G, Wong WH, Li Z, Xu C. Evaluating the Pros and Cons of Different Peer Review Policies via Simulation. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Aug;22(4):1073-1094. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9683-8. Epub 2015 Jul 14. PMID: 26169697.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Comparing Effects of Two Different Types of Nei-Guan Acupuncture Stimulation Devices in Reducing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting.

Journal of perianesthesia nursing : official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses

Oh H, Kim BH.
PMID: 28527545
J Perianesth Nurs. 2017 Jun;32(3):177-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2015.12.010. Epub 2016 Sep 01.

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of a relief band using transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation with a wrist band using acupressure on the Nei-Guan acupuncture point to relieve postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients who had undergone gynecologic surgery.DESIGN:...

Cite
Oh H, Kim BH. Comparing Effects of Two Different Types of Nei-Guan Acupuncture Stimulation Devices in Reducing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. J Perianesth Nurs. 2016;32(3):177-187doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2015.12.010.
Oh, H., & Kim, B. H. (2017). Comparing Effects of Two Different Types of Nei-Guan Acupuncture Stimulation Devices in Reducing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Journal of perianesthesia nursing : official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses, 32(3), 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2015.12.010
Oh, Hanna, and Kim, Bo Hwan. "Comparing Effects of Two Different Types of Nei-Guan Acupuncture Stimulation Devices in Reducing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting." Journal of perianesthesia nursing : official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses vol. 32,3 (2017): 177-187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2015.12.010
Oh H, Kim BH. Comparing Effects of Two Different Types of Nei-Guan Acupuncture Stimulation Devices in Reducing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. J Perianesth Nurs. 2017 Jun;32(3):177-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2015.12.010. Epub 2016 Sep 01. PMID: 28527545.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Reply: Is Double-Blinded Peer Review Necessary? The Effect of Blinding on Review Quality.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery

Shauver MJ, Chung KC.
PMID: 27348680
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jul;138(1):162e-163e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002450.

No abstract available.

Cite
Shauver MJ, Chung KC. Reply: Is Double-Blinded Peer Review Necessary? The Effect of Blinding on Review Quality. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(1):162e-163edoi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002450.
Shauver, M. J., & Chung, K. C. (2016). Reply: Is Double-Blinded Peer Review Necessary? The Effect of Blinding on Review Quality. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 138(1), 162e-163e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002450
Shauver, Melissa J, and Chung, Kevin C. "Reply: Is Double-Blinded Peer Review Necessary? The Effect of Blinding on Review Quality." Plastic and reconstructive surgery vol. 138,1 (2016): 162e-163e. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002450
Shauver MJ, Chung KC. Reply: Is Double-Blinded Peer Review Necessary? The Effect of Blinding on Review Quality. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jul;138(1):162e-163e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002450. PMID: 27348680.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Triple-blindness.

The European journal of medicine

Cocito L.
PMID: 8252172
Eur J Med. 1993 May;2(5):317.

No abstract available.

Cite
Cocito L. Triple-blindness. Eur J Med. 1993;2(5):317
Cocito, L. (1993). Triple-blindness. The European journal of medicine, 2(5), 317.
Cocito, L. "Triple-blindness." The European journal of medicine vol. 2,5 (1993): 317.
Cocito L. Triple-blindness. Eur J Med. 1993 May;2(5):317. PMID: 8252172.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
More about peer review: is it time for double-blind reviews?.

Nature immunology

Klein JR.
PMID: 11577338
Nat Immunol. 2001 Oct;2(10):892. doi: 10.1038/ni1001-892.

No abstract available.

Cite
Klein JR. More about peer review: is it time for double-blind reviews?. Nat Immunol. 2001;2(10):892doi: 10.1038/ni1001-892.
Klein, J. R. (2001). More about peer review: is it time for double-blind reviews?. Nature immunology, 2(10), 892. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1001-892
Klein, J R. "More about peer review: is it time for double-blind reviews?." Nature immunology vol. 2,10 (2001): 892. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1001-892
Klein JR. More about peer review: is it time for double-blind reviews?. Nat Immunol. 2001 Oct;2(10):892. doi: 10.1038/ni1001-892. PMID: 11577338.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Double blind pharmacological experiments in practical course for medical students.

Acta physiologica et pharmacologica Neerlandica

van NOORDWIJK.
PMID: 14480276
Acta Physiol Pharmacol Neerl. 1962;11:83-97.

No abstract available.

Cite
van NOORDWIJK. Double blind pharmacological experiments in practical course for medical students. Acta Physiol Pharmacol Neerl. 1962;11:83-97
van NOORDWIJK. (1962). Double blind pharmacological experiments in practical course for medical students. Acta physiologica et pharmacologica Neerlandica, 1183-97.
van NOORDWIJK. "Double blind pharmacological experiments in practical course for medical students." Acta physiologica et pharmacologica Neerlandica vol. 11 (1962): 83-97.
van NOORDWIJK. Double blind pharmacological experiments in practical course for medical students. Acta Physiol Pharmacol Neerl. 1962;11:83-97. PMID: 14480276.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
[Double-blind. The bias control in the performance of clinical trials. Contradictions, lacks and implications].

Medicina clinica

Rodríguez Martín JL, Casado Collado A.
PMID: 11851998
Med Clin (Barc). 2002 Feb 16;118(5):192-5. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(02)72329-4.

No abstract available.

Cite
Rodríguez Martín JL, Casado Collado A. Doble ciego. El control de los sesgos en la realización de ensayos clínicos. Contradicciones, insuficiencias e implicaciones. [Double-blind. The bias control in the performance of clinical trials. Contradictions, lacks and implications]. Med Clin (Barc). 2002;118(5):192-5doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(02)72329-4.
Rodríguez Martín, J. L., & Casado Collado, A. (2002). Doble ciego. El control de los sesgos en la realización de ensayos clínicos. Contradicciones, insuficiencias e implicaciones. [Double-blind. The bias control in the performance of clinical trials. Contradictions, lacks and implications]. Medicina clinica, 118(5), 192-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-7753(02)72329-4
Rodríguez Martín, José Luis, and Casado Collado, Alfonso. "Doble ciego. El control de los sesgos en la realización de ensayos clínicos. Contradicciones, insuficiencias e implicaciones." [Double-blind. The bias control in the performance of clinical trials. Contradictions, lacks and implications]. Medicina clinica vol. 118,5 (2002): 192-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-7753(02)72329-4
Rodríguez Martín JL, Casado Collado A. Doble ciego. El control de los sesgos en la realización de ensayos clínicos. Contradicciones, insuficiencias e implicaciones. [Double-blind. The bias control in the performance of clinical trials. Contradictions, lacks and implications]. Med Clin (Barc). 2002 Feb 16;118(5):192-5. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(02)72329-4. Spanish. PMID: 11851998.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Blinded review revisited.

Research in nursing & health

Froman RD.
PMID: 20645419
Res Nurs Health. 2010 Aug;33(4):273-5. doi: 10.1002/nur.20385.

No abstract available.

Cite
Froman RD. Blinded review revisited. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33(4):273-5doi: 10.1002/nur.20385.
Froman, R. D. (2010). Blinded review revisited. Research in nursing & health, 33(4), 273-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20385
Froman, Robin Dawn. "Blinded review revisited." Research in nursing & health vol. 33,4 (2010): 273-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20385
Froman RD. Blinded review revisited. Res Nurs Health. 2010 Aug;33(4):273-5. doi: 10.1002/nur.20385. PMID: 20645419.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
[The journal's development since the introduction of online manuscript submission and the double blinded peer review of manuscripts].

Klinische Padiatrie

Göbel U, Gortner L.
PMID: 20665364
Klin Padiatr. 2010 Jul;222(4):231-3. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1261921. Epub 2010 Jul 21.

No abstract available.

Cite
Göbel U, Gortner L. Die Entwicklung der Klinischen Pädiatrie seit Einführung des Online-Redaktionssystems und die Doppelblind-Begutachtung von Manuskripten. [The journal's development since the introduction of online manuscript submission and the double blinded peer review of manuscripts]. Klin Padiatr. 2010;222(4):231-3doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1261921.
Göbel, U., & Gortner, L. (2010). Die Entwicklung der Klinischen Pädiatrie seit Einführung des Online-Redaktionssystems und die Doppelblind-Begutachtung von Manuskripten. [The journal's development since the introduction of online manuscript submission and the double blinded peer review of manuscripts]. Klinische Padiatrie, 222(4), 231-3. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1261921
Göbel, U, and Gortner, L. "Die Entwicklung der Klinischen Pädiatrie seit Einführung des Online-Redaktionssystems und die Doppelblind-Begutachtung von Manuskripten." [The journal's development since the introduction of online manuscript submission and the double blinded peer review of manuscripts]. Klinische Padiatrie vol. 222,4 (2010): 231-3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1261921
Göbel U, Gortner L. Die Entwicklung der Klinischen Pädiatrie seit Einführung des Online-Redaktionssystems und die Doppelblind-Begutachtung von Manuskripten. [The journal's development since the introduction of online manuscript submission and the double blinded peer review of manuscripts]. Klin Padiatr. 2010 Jul;222(4):231-3. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1261921. Epub 2010 Jul 21. German. PMID: 20665364.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Blinding in clinical trials: a practical approach.

Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)

Bang H, Park JJ.
PMID: 23140113
J Altern Complement Med. 2013 Apr;19(4):367-9. doi: 10.1089/acm.2012.0210. Epub 2012 Nov 09.

Blinding is important in the conduct of clinical trials, yet it generally receives less attention and effort than other trial components (e.g., randomization, compliance) that are rigorously treated in the design and/or analysis stages. Furthermore, although the word "blind"...

Cite
Bang H, Park JJ. Blinding in clinical trials: a practical approach. J Altern Complement Med. 2012;19(4):367-9doi: 10.1089/acm.2012.0210.
Bang, H., & Park, J. J. (2013). Blinding in clinical trials: a practical approach. Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.), 19(4), 367-9. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2012.0210
Bang, Heejung, and Park, Jongbae J. "Blinding in clinical trials: a practical approach." Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) vol. 19,4 (2013): 367-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2012.0210
Bang H, Park JJ. Blinding in clinical trials: a practical approach. J Altern Complement Med. 2013 Apr;19(4):367-9. doi: 10.1089/acm.2012.0210. Epub 2012 Nov 09. PMID: 23140113.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Perspectives on double-blind peer review from collectivist cultural contexts.

The Medical journal of Australia

Lapeña JFF, Munk PL, Saw A, Peh WC.
PMID: 30945753
Med J Aust. 2019 May;210(8):347-348.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50131. Epub 2019 Apr 04.

No abstract available.

Cite
Lapeña JFF, Munk PL, Saw A, et al. Perspectives on double-blind peer review from collectivist cultural contexts. Med J Aust. 2019;210(8):347-348.e1doi: 10.5694/mja2.50131.
Lapeña, J. F. F., Munk, P. L., Saw, A., & Peh, W. C. (2019). Perspectives on double-blind peer review from collectivist cultural contexts. The Medical journal of Australia, 210(8), 347-348.e1. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50131
Lapeña, Jose Florencio F, et al. "Perspectives on double-blind peer review from collectivist cultural contexts." The Medical journal of Australia vol. 210,8 (2019): 347-348.e1. doi: https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50131
Lapeña JFF, Munk PL, Saw A, Peh WC. Perspectives on double-blind peer review from collectivist cultural contexts. Med J Aust. 2019 May;210(8):347-348.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50131. Epub 2019 Apr 04. PMID: 30945753.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Showing 1 to 12 of 34 entries