Display options
Cite
Shauver MJ, Chung KC. Reply: Is Double-Blinded Peer Review Necessary? The Effect of Blinding on Review Quality. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(1):162e-163edoi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002450.
Shauver, M. J., & Chung, K. C. (2016). Reply: Is Double-Blinded Peer Review Necessary? The Effect of Blinding on Review Quality. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 138(1), 162e-163e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002450
Shauver, Melissa J, and Chung, Kevin C. "Reply: Is Double-Blinded Peer Review Necessary? The Effect of Blinding on Review Quality." Plastic and reconstructive surgery vol. 138,1 (2016): 162e-163e. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002450
Shauver MJ, Chung KC. Reply: Is Double-Blinded Peer Review Necessary? The Effect of Blinding on Review Quality. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jul;138(1):162e-163e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002450. PMID: 27348680.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jul;138(1):162e-163e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002450.

Reply: Is Double-Blinded Peer Review Necessary? The Effect of Blinding on Review Quality.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery

Melissa J Shauver, Kevin C Chung

Affiliations

  1. Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery.
  2. Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich.

PMID: 27348680 DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002450

[No abstract available.]

References

  1. Chung KC, Shauver MJ, Malay S, Zhong L, Weinstein A, Rohrich RJ. Is double-blinded peer review necessary? The effect of blinding on review quality. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:13691377. - PubMed
  2. Kravitz RL, Franks P, Feldman MD, Gerrity M, Byrne C, Tierney WM. Editorial peer reviewers’ recommendations at a general medical journal: Are they reliable and do editors care? PLoS One 2010;5:e10072. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types