Med Educ. 2001 Jan;35(1):68-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00843.x.
Medical education
J Hayden, D McKinlay
PMID: 11123598 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00843.x
In postgraduate medical education there will always be a tension between delivering the service and ensuring time for reflection and learning. The balance requires monitoring to ensure national implementation of standards and to provide an external review for hospitals. However, the current system in the United Kingdom of visiting by many different agencies is disruptive to hospitals and wasteful of resources. The North Western Deanery has worked with medical royal colleges to develop a co-ordinated system of visiting and reporting which is designed to share information and expertise while reducing the pressure on hospitals. SETTING AND MAINTAINING STANDARDS: Clear standards are published and hospitals are encouraged to measure their own performance against these so that they are able to address identified problems. The effectiveness of the visits depends on collection and collation of data, especially face-to-face interviews with trainees and consultants. At the end of the visit a structured verbal feedback is given to senior managers and clinicians in the hospital and is followed by a written report. IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF TRAINING: Systematic review of training placements by the postgraduate dean's team has resulted in a steady increase in the quality of training placements and a structured approach has given trusts a framework to review the quality of training between visits. The future must lie in greater investment of responsibility in postgraduate deans for routine monitoring of training placements to consistent standards, which would allow the newly emerging Medical Education Standards Board (MESB) to review deaneries rather than individual placements.
