Display options
Share it on

BMC Womens Health. 2002 Dec 23;2(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-2-13.

The temporal reliability of serum estrogens, progesterone, gonadotropins, SHBG and urinary estrogen and progesterone metabolites in premenopausal women.

BMC women's health

Andrew E Williams, Gertraud Maskarinec, Adrian A Franke, Frank Z Stanczyk

Affiliations

  1. Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA. [email protected]

PMID: 12498620 PMCID: PMC140038 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-2-13

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is little existing research to guide researchers in estimating the minimum number of measurement occasions required to obtain reliable estimates of serum estrogens, progesterone, gonadotropins, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), and urinary estrogen and progesterone metabolites in premenopausal women. METHODS: Using data from a longitudinal study of 34 women with a mean age of 42.3 years (SD = 2.6), we calculated the minimum number of measurement occasions required to obtain reliable estimates of 12 analytes (8 in blood, 4 in urine). Five samples were obtained over 1 year: at baseline, and after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. We also calculated the percent of true variance accounted for by a single measurement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between measurement occasions. RESULTS: Only 2 of the 12 analytes we examined, SHBG and estrone sulfate (E1S), could be adequately estimated by a single measurement using a minimum reliability standard of having the potential to account for 64% of true variance. Other analytes required from 2 to 12 occasions to account for 81% of the true variance, and 2 to 5 occasions to account for 64% of true variance. ICCs ranged from 0.33 for estradiol (E2) to 0.88 for SHBG. Percent of true variance accounted for by single measurements ranged from 29% for luteinizing hormone (LH) to 92% for SHBG. CONCLUSIONS: Experimental designs that take the natural variability of these analytes into account by obtaining measurements on a sufficient number of occasions will be rewarded with increased power and accuracy.

References

  1. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996 Nov;5(11):917-22 - PubMed
  2. Clin Chem. 1991 Jun;37(6):838-44 - PubMed
  3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jan;182(1 Pt 1):23-9 - PubMed
  4. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Jun;8(6):567-77 - PubMed
  5. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Dec;8(12):1059-64 - PubMed
  6. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002 Jan;11(1):147-51 - PubMed
  7. Endocr Pract. 2000 Jul-Aug;6(4):296-304 - PubMed
  8. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996 Oct;5(10):835-44 - PubMed
  9. Epidemiology. 2000 Nov;11(6):635-40 - PubMed
  10. J Steroid Biochem. 1982 Jun;16(6):801-10 - PubMed
  11. Am J Clin Nutr. 1979 Dec;32(12):2546-59 - PubMed
  12. Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;25(6):1107-16 - PubMed
  13. Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8 - PubMed
  14. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994 Jan-Feb;3(1):47-50 - PubMed
  15. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1995 Jul-Aug;4(5):509-13 - PubMed
  16. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989 Jul;50(1):155-67 - PubMed
  17. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994 Mar;3(2):149-53 - PubMed
  18. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000 Jan;9(1):81-7 - PubMed
  19. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002 Feb;11(2):195-201 - PubMed
  20. Stat Med. 1999 Nov 15;18(21):2831-45 - PubMed
  21. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1992 Sep-Oct;21(5):407-11 - PubMed
  22. Stat Med. 1999 Nov 15;18(21):2815-29 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support