Display options
Share it on

J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2001 Oct-Dec;12(10):991-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1012869318205.

Urothelial cell transplantation using biodegradable synthetic scaffolds.

Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine

S D Scriven, L K Trejdosiewicz, D F Thomas, J Southgate

Affiliations

  1. Imperial Cancer Research Fund Cancer Medicine Research Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

PMID: 15348353 DOI: 10.1023/a:1012869318205

Abstract

Reconstruction of the urinary bladder with bowel to restore storage capacity is associated with significant complications arising from substituting an absorptive, mucus-producing intestinal epithelium for the barrier urothelium of the bladder. To overcome these problems, we are developing a "composite enterocystoplasty" procedure to replace the epithelium of the bowel with autologous in vitro-propagated normal urothelial cells. The aims of this study were to evaluate synthetic biomaterials as delivery vehicles for the cultured urothelial cells and provide support during transfer and cell adherence to the de-epithelialized bowel wall. The surgical compliance of 12 biomaterials was evaluated, along with their ability to support urothelial cell attachment. Transfer of urothelial cells onto biomaterials as single cell suspensions or intact cell sheets was investigated. Seeding of a single cell suspension on to non-woven mesh resulted in poor cell attachment. Seeding onto woven mesh was more efficient, but the most effective transfer method involved producing an intact cell sheet that could be combined with woven, knitted and non-woven biomaterials. Transfer of the cell sheet : mesh complexes onto a de-epithelialized bladder stroma produced a stratified epithelium incorporating the strands of the mesh and expressing urothelial-associated antigens after 48 h in organ culture. Thus, we have developed and evaluated a suitable transfer method for in vitro propagated urothelial cells to be used in "composite enterocystoplasty".

Copyright 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

References

  1. Nat Biotechnol. 1999 Feb;17 (2):149-55 - PubMed
  2. J Urol. 1993 Aug;150(2 Pt 2):726-9 - PubMed
  3. Br J Urol. 1985 Feb;57(1):27-31 - PubMed
  4. Br J Urol. 1991 Jun;67(6):588-95 - PubMed
  5. J Urol. 1992 Aug;148(2 Pt 2):658-62 - PubMed
  6. Int Urol Nephrol. 1972;4(1):25-33 - PubMed
  7. J Urol. 1984 Nov;132(5):886-91 - PubMed
  8. Lab Invest. 1994 Oct;71(4):583-94 - PubMed
  9. Br J Urol. 1992 Jun;69(6):594-7 - PubMed
  10. J Urol. 1993 Aug;150(2 Pt 2):721-5 - PubMed
  11. Urology. 1995 Sep;46(3):396-400 - PubMed
  12. J Urol. 1992 Nov;148(5):1377-82 - PubMed
  13. Br J Urol. 1996 Jul;78(1):69-73 - PubMed
  14. Eur Urol. 2001 Apr;39(4):471-7 - PubMed
  15. Br J Urol. 1989 Apr;63(4):372-4 - PubMed
  16. J Urol. 1997 Sep;158(3 Pt 2):1147-52 - PubMed
  17. J Urol. 1996 Aug;156(2 Pt 2):608-13 - PubMed
  18. Br J Urol. 1989 Feb;63(2):165-70 - PubMed
  19. J Urol. 1994 Aug;152(2 Pt 2):671-4 - PubMed
  20. Br J Urol. 1997 Apr;79(4):505-15 - PubMed
  21. Br J Urol. 1996 Jul;78(1):47-53 - PubMed
  22. J Urol. 1993 Aug;150(2 Pt 2):608-12 - PubMed
  23. J Urol. 1993 Aug;150(2 Pt 2):710-2 - PubMed

Publication Types