Display options
Share it on

Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007 Jun 28;4:14. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-4-14.

Assessing outcomes of health and medical research: do we measure what counts or count what we can measure?.

Australia and New Zealand health policy

Robert Wells, Judith A Whitworth

Affiliations

  1. Menzies Centre for Health Policy, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.

PMID: 17597545 PMCID: PMC1929109 DOI: 10.1186/1743-8462-4-14

Abstract

Governments world wide are increasingly demanding outcome measures to evaluate research investment. Health and medical research outputs can be considered as gains in knowledge, wealth and health. Measurement of the impacts of research on health are difficult, particularly within the time frames of granting bodies. Thus evaluations often measure what can be measured, rather than what should be measured. Traditional academic metrics are insufficient to demonstrate societal benefit from public investment in health research. New approaches that consider all the benefits of research are needed.

References

  1. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001 Dec;25(6):556-60 - PubMed
  2. Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Oct;82(10):733-9 - PubMed
  3. Med J Aust. 1949 Sep 3;2(10):349-52 - PubMed
  4. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Sep;44(9):1145-56 - PubMed
  5. Int J Cancer. 1987 Oct 15;40(4):511-8 - PubMed
  6. Science. 1994 Oct 7;266(5182):49-51 - PubMed
  7. J Immunol Methods. 1994 May 2;171(1):131-7 - PubMed
  8. Med J Aust. 1985 Apr 15;142(8):439-44 - PubMed
  9. Lancet. 2006 Apr 22;367(9519):1319-27 - PubMed
  10. Med J Aust. 2006 Mar 20;184(6):282-6 - PubMed
  11. J Hand Surg Br. 2004 Dec;29(6):521-9 - PubMed
  12. Med J Aust. 1985 Apr 15;142(8):436-9 - PubMed

Publication Types