Display options
Cite
Bauer TN, Bodner T, Erdogan B, et al. Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: a meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(3):707-21doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.707.
Bauer, T. N., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D. M., & Tucker, J. S. (2007). Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: a meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. The Journal of applied psychology, 92(3), 707-21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.707
Bauer, Talya N, et al. "Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: a meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods." The Journal of applied psychology vol. 92,3 (2007): 707-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.707
Bauer TN, Bodner T, Erdogan B, Truxillo DM, Tucker JS. Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: a meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. J Appl Psychol. 2007 May;92(3):707-21. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.707. PMID: 17484552.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Appl Psychol. 2007 May;92(3):707-21. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.707.

Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: a meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods.

The Journal of applied psychology

Talya N Bauer, Todd Bodner, Berrin Erdogan, Donald M Truxillo, Jennifer S Tucker

Affiliations

  1. School of Business Administration, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207, USA. [email protected]

PMID: 17484552 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.707

Abstract

The authors tested a model of antecedents and outcomes of newcomer adjustment using 70 unique samples of newcomers with meta-analytic and path modeling techniques. Specifically, they proposed and tested a model in which adjustment (role clarity, self-efficacy, and social acceptance) mediated the effects of organizational socialization tactics and information seeking on socialization outcomes (job satisfaction, organizational commitment, job performance, intentions to remain, and turnover). The results generally supported this model. In addition, the authors examined the moderating effects of methodology on these relationships by coding for 3 methodological issues: data collection type (longitudinal vs. cross-sectional), sample characteristics (school-to-work vs. work-to-work transitions), and measurement of the antecedents (facet vs. composite measurement). Discussion focuses on the implications of the findings and suggestions for future research.

2007 APA, all rights reserved

MeSH terms

Publication Types