Display options
Share it on

Physiol Entomol. 2007;32(3):287-293. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2007.00571.x.

Cuticular lipid mass and desiccation rates in Glossina pallidipes: interpopulation variation.

Physiological entomology

Russell Jurenka, John S Terblanche, C Jaco Klok, Steven L Chown, Elliot S Krafsur

Affiliations

  1. Department of Entomology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, U.S.A.

PMID: 18726002 PMCID: PMC2906758 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2007.00571.x

Abstract

Tsetse flies, Glossina pallidipes (Diptera: Glossinidae) are said to have strong dispersal tendencies. Gene flow among these populations is estimated to be the theoretical equivalent of no more than one or two reproducing flies per generation, thereby raising the hypothesis of local regimes of natural selection. Flies were sampled from four environmentally diverse locations in Kenya to determine whether populations are homogeneous in desiccation tolerance and cuticular lipids. Cuticular hydrocarbon fractions known to act as sex pheromones do not differ among populations, thereby eliminating sexual selection as an isolating mechanism. Cuticular lipid quantities vary among populations and are not correlated with prevailing temperatures, humidities, and normalized density vegetation indices. Females demonstrate a stronger correlation than males between cuticular lipid mass and body weight. Desiccation rates also vary among populations, but are not correlated with the amounts of cuticular lipid. Chemical analysis of cuticular hydrocarbons by gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy shows that one of the four populations has more 11,15- and 11,21-dimethyl-31 hydrocarbon on females. These results are discussed in the context of population differences and estimates of gene flow.

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Mar 27;98(7):3920-5 - PubMed
  2. J Exp Biol. 1997 Jun;200(Pt 12):1821-32 - PubMed
  3. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Apr 22;267(1445):739-45 - PubMed
  4. Evolution. 1999 Dec;53(6):1823-1834 - PubMed
  5. Annu Rev Entomol. 2005;50:101-23 - PubMed
  6. J Evol Biol. 2005 Jan;18(1):213-22 - PubMed
  7. Bull Entomol Res. 2000 Jun;90(3):201-9 - PubMed
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Aug 15;88(16):7257-60 - PubMed
  9. J Insect Physiol. 2001 Jul;47(7):649-660 - PubMed
  10. Adv Parasitol. 2000;47:129-71 - PubMed
  11. J Insect Physiol. 2001 Dec;47(12):1377-1388 - PubMed
  12. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006 May;74(5):786-94 - PubMed
  13. Trends Parasitol. 2003 Apr;19(4):162-6 - PubMed
  14. J Chem Ecol. 1984 Mar;10(3):429-50 - PubMed
  15. Insect Mol Biol. 2002 Feb;11(1):37-45 - PubMed
  16. J Exp Biol. 2006 Mar;209(Pt 6):1064-73 - PubMed
  17. PLoS Biol. 2005 Nov;3(11):e368 - PubMed
  18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 31;98(16):9157-60 - PubMed
  19. J Insect Physiol. 2002 Apr;48(4):391-400 - PubMed
  20. Science. 2000 Oct 20;290(5491):519-21 - PubMed
  21. Med Vet Entomol. 2006 Mar;20(1):138-49 - PubMed
  22. Bull Entomol Res. 2005 Oct;95(5):437-47 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support