Display options
Cite
Cornet M. Obtaining cell proliferation for chromosome preparation in gill tissue culture of the oyster Crassostrea gigas. Cytotechnology. 2000;32(1):1-7doi: 10.1023/A:1008053305546.
Cornet, M. (2000). Obtaining cell proliferation for chromosome preparation in gill tissue culture of the oyster Crassostrea gigas. Cytotechnology, 32(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008053305546
Cornet, M. "Obtaining cell proliferation for chromosome preparation in gill tissue culture of the oyster Crassostrea gigas." Cytotechnology vol. 32,1 (2000): 1-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008053305546
Cornet M. Obtaining cell proliferation for chromosome preparation in gill tissue culture of the oyster Crassostrea gigas. Cytotechnology. 2000 Jan;32(1):1-7. doi: 10.1023/A:1008053305546. PMID: 19002962; PMCID: PMC3449444.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Cytotechnology. 2000 Jan;32(1):1-7. doi: 10.1023/A:1008053305546.

Obtaining cell proliferation for chromosome preparation in gill tissue culture of the oyster Crassostrea gigas.

Cytotechnology

M Cornet

Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire d'Océanographie Biologique, CNRS UMR 5805, Université Bordeaux I, Avenue des Facultés, 33405, Talence Cedex, France, [email protected].

PMID: 19002962 PMCID: PMC3449444 DOI: 10.1023/A:1008053305546

Abstract

The present results were obtained in the course of theadjustment to the oyster Crassostrea gigas of atissue culture technique recently developed for themussel Mytilus edulis. With respect to theprotocol originally described, the effects of twomodifications are reported: (1) replacement of chickembryo extract by chicken serum for medium enrichment,and (2) achievement of cultures in rotating tubes(roller drum) in place of stationary condition.Paradoxical results were obtained: whereas takenseparately, each modification exerted a negativeeffect which is statistically significant, combinated,they exerted a high positive effect representing athree-fold increase of the mean metaphase spreadnumber per slide (i.e. 71.5). Hypotheses are proposedto explain the mechanisms involved. It is suggestedthat the two additives work differently and thatcultures with chick embryo extract enriched mediumcould not withstand the condition generated by theroller drum. Conversely, cultures performed withchicken serum enriched medium would be in a betterphysiological state and the roller allow to obtain acell proliferation after only six days of incubation.

References

  1. Cytobios. 1995;84(336):7-12 - PubMed
  2. Cytotechnology. 1996 Jan;22(1-3):3-16 - PubMed
  3. J Invertebr Pathol. 1966 Jun;8(2):137-40 - PubMed
  4. Cytotechnology. 1994;16(2):109-20 - PubMed
  5. Cytotechnology. 1996 Jan;22(1-3):225-37 - PubMed
  6. Cytotechnology. 1997 Jul;24(2):89-98 - PubMed
  7. Cytotechnology. 1997 Jan;23(1-3):95-101 - PubMed
  8. Nature. 1964 Dec 12;204:1106-7 - PubMed
  9. Cytotechnology. 1997 Jan;23(1-3):113-7 - PubMed
  10. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci. 1960 Apr 11;250:2751-3 - PubMed
  11. Methods Mol Biol. 1990;5:49-63 - PubMed
  12. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 1993 Dec;29A(12):901-3 - PubMed

Publication Types