Display options
Share it on

J Genet Couns. 2009 Jun;18(3):252-64. doi: 10.1007/s10897-009-9218-z. Epub 2009 Mar 18.

Decision-making about inherited cancer risk: exploring dimensions of genetic responsibility.

Journal of genetic counseling

Holly Etchegary, Fiona Miller, Sonya deLaat, Brenda Wilson, June Carroll, Mario Cappelli

Affiliations

  1. Interdisciplinary Research Group (IDR), IWK Health Centre, NS, Canada. [email protected]

PMID: 19294336 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-009-9218-z

Abstract

Since genetic information has implications for family members, some choices about genetic risk may be influenced by perceptions of responsibility to relatives. Drawing upon 25 semi-structured interviews with test recipients in Canada, this study explored decisions about inherited breast-ovarian and colon cancer. Qualitative data analysis revealed the pervasive significance of genetic responsibility in test decisions. We highlight three dimensions of genetic responsibility: 1) to know about the self for self; 2) to know about the self for others; 3) to know about the self to oblige others to know. It is argued that these dimensions of genetic responsibility have implications for test decisions, family relationships and other family members' desire to know (or not know) and to act (or not act) with respect to their own genetic risk. In particular, genetic responsibility may play out as a framing of a relative's moral obligation to know their risk that could obviate any interest they might have in not knowing. We conclude that perceptions of responsibility to-and of-other family members be thoroughly explored in genetic counseling sessions.

References

  1. J Genet Couns. 2005 Oct;14(5):387-94 - PubMed
  2. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2005;37(1):18-24 - PubMed
  3. Gastroenterology. 2000 May;118(5):829-34 - PubMed
  4. J Genet Couns. 2005 Jun;14(3):219-34 - PubMed
  5. J Genet Couns. 2000 Jun;9(3):219-35 - PubMed
  6. Bioethics. 2001 Jun;15(3):231-47 - PubMed
  7. Eur J Health Law. 2000 Jun;7(2):173-83 - PubMed
  8. Am J Med Genet. 2001 Fall;106(3):191-8 - PubMed
  9. J Genet Couns. 2005 Jun;14(3):207-17 - PubMed
  10. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Dec;57(6):1457-62 - PubMed
  11. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jan;56(1):265-71 - PubMed
  12. Sociol Health Illn. 2006 Nov;28(7):969-88 - PubMed
  13. J Med Ethics. 2004 Oct;30(5):435-9; discussion 439-40 - PubMed
  14. Soc Sci Med. 2004 Aug;59(3):553-65 - PubMed
  15. Qual Health Res. 2006 Jan;16(1):97-118 - PubMed
  16. J Med Genet. 2001 Oct;38(10):683-91 - PubMed
  17. Fam Cancer. 2001;1(1):57-60 - PubMed
  18. J Health Psychol. 2002 Jul;7(4):469-84 - PubMed
  19. Genet Test. 2006 Spring;10(1):60-7 - PubMed
  20. J Genet Couns. 2006 Aug;15(4):253-65 - PubMed
  21. J Med Genet. 1996 Sep;33(9):731-6 - PubMed
  22. J Genet Couns. 2006 Dec;15(6):491-503 - PubMed
  23. Community Genet. 2003;6(1):29-36 - PubMed
  24. Eur J Health Law. 2000 Jun;7(2):185-91 - PubMed
  25. Eur J Health Law. 1999 Jun;6(2):119-32 - PubMed
  26. J Genet Couns. 2004 Apr;13(2):83-114 - PubMed
  27. Theor Med Bioeth. 2001 Sep;22(5):415-36 - PubMed
  28. J Med Ethics. 2003 Apr;29(2):74-9; discussion 80-3 - PubMed
  29. Genet Test. 2004 Winter;8(4):421-30 - PubMed
  30. Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jan;58(1):137-49 - PubMed
  31. J Genet Couns. 2007 Feb;16(1):71-83 - PubMed
  32. J Health Psychol. 2002 Mar;7(2):125-30 - PubMed
  33. J Genet Couns. 2005 Apr;14(2):133-40 - PubMed
  34. Community Genet. 2004;7(1):15-24 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types