Display options
Share it on

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012 Jan;85(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00420-011-0634-7. Epub 2011 Apr 02.

Depression in the workplace: a systematic review of evidence-based prevention strategies.

International archives of occupational and environmental health

Sandra Dietrich, Stefanie Deckert, Martin Ceynowa, Ulrich Hegerl, Katarina Stengler

Affiliations

  1. Clinic and Outpatients' Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Leipzig, SemmelweisstraƟe 10, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. [email protected]

PMID: 21461766 DOI: 10.1007/s00420-011-0634-7

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depression is one of the most common mental disorders, causing enormous personal and economic burden. In its early stages, however, it is the most manageable of mental disorders. The workplace, where a large proportion of the adult population can be reached, might be a good setting for prevention interventions that target depression directly.

AIMS: Identify evidence-based indicated/secondary prevention strategies for depression in the workplace.

METHODS: Systematic review of articles published until February 2010 using PubMed, EbscoHost and the Cochrane Library. Studies were selected based on different inclusion criteria, such as diagnosis of depression with validated screening instruments and presence of a control group.

RESULTS: A total of 9,173 articles were found. One evaluated intervention study in the workplace met all inclusion criteria (French APRAND programme). The intervention, which combined the provision of diagnosis and psychoeducation, had a positive effect on people with depression, with a significant trend towards chances of recovery or remission after 1 year. The remaining studies did not meet the predefined inclusion criteria of this systematic review.

CONCLUSION: The findings are quite sobering given the high prevalence of depression and the individual and societal burden caused by it. More tailor-made interventions in the workplace targeting depression directly are needed.

References

  1. JAMA. 2007 Sep 26;298(12):1401-11 - PubMed
  2. Work. 2009;33(1):13-22 - PubMed
  3. BMC Psychiatry. 2004 Aug 15;4:23 - PubMed
  4. J Occup Environ Med. 2001 Dec;43(12):1073-80 - PubMed
  5. Can J Public Health. 2008 Jan-Feb;99(1):73-7 - PubMed
  6. J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Apr;50(4):379-80 - PubMed
  7. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD006237 - PubMed
  8. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2009;39(1):1-13 - PubMed
  9. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:293-319 - PubMed
  10. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004 Jun;58(3):280-4 - PubMed
  11. Med Care. 2004 Dec;42(12):1211-21 - PubMed
  12. J Occup Environ Med. 2005 Nov;47(11):1099-109 - PubMed
  13. J Occup Environ Med. 2005 Jan;47(1):60-7 - PubMed
  14. Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;160(12):2080-90 - PubMed
  15. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):W65-94 - PubMed
  16. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009 Jan;35(1):7-18 - PubMed
  17. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Sep;163(9):1561-8 - PubMed
  18. Eur Psychiatry. 2006 Oct;21(7):451-9 - PubMed
  19. BMC Public Health. 2009 Jul 15;9:239 - PubMed
  20. J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Apr;50(4):482-91 - PubMed
  21. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11(4):447-54 - PubMed
  22. J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Aug;50(8):960-8 - PubMed
  23. J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Apr;50(4):411-27 - PubMed
  24. Healthc Pap. 2004;5(2):32-44 - PubMed
  25. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:181-212 - PubMed
  26. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2008 Feb;10(1):73-9 - PubMed
  27. Can J Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;52(6):339-45 - PubMed
  28. J Manag Care Pharm. 2005 Apr;11(3 Suppl):S16-20 - PubMed
  29. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2007 Nov;81(2):151-7 - PubMed
  30. Health Rep. 2007 Feb;18(1):9-22 - PubMed
  31. Lancet. 1997 May 24;349(9064):1498-504 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types