Orthopedics. 2012 Apr;35(4):e555-60. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120327-13.
Trends in the orthopedic job market and the importance of fellowship subspecialty training.
Orthopedics
Nathan T Morrell, Deana M Mercer, Moheb S Moneim
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001, USA. [email protected]
PMID: 22495859
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120327-13
Abstract
Previous studies have examined possible incentives for pursuing orthopedic fellowship training, but we are unaware of previously published studies reporting the trends in the orthopedic job market since the acceptance of certain criteria for fellowship programs by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) in 1985. We hypothesized that, since the initiation of accredited postresidency fellowship programs, job opportunities for fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons have increased and job opportunities for nonfellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons have decreased. We reviewed the job advertisements printed in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume, for the years 1984, 1994, 2004, and 2009. We categorized the job opportunities as available for either a general (nonfellowship-trained) orthopedic surgeon or a fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon. Based on the advertisements posted in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume, a trend exists in the orthopedic job market toward seeking fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons. In the years 1984, 1994, 2004, and 2009, the percentage of job opportunities seeking fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons was 16.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.1%-20.3%), 40.6% (95% CI, 38.1%-43.1%), 52.2% (95% CI, 48.5%-55.9%), and 68.2% (95% CI, 65.0%-71.4%), respectively. These differences were statistically significant (analysis of variance, P<.05). Fellowship training is thus a worthwhile endeavor.
Copyright 2012, SLACK Incorporated.
MeSH terms
Publication Types
