Display options
Cite
Xu Z, Li L, Chu J, et al. Development and application of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays on rapid detection of various types of staphylococci strains. Food Res Int. 2012;47(2):166-173doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.042.
Xu, Z., Li, L., Chu, J., Peters, B. M., Harris, M. L., Li, B., Shi, L., & Shirtliff, M. E. (2012). Development and application of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays on rapid detection of various types of staphylococci strains. Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.), 47(2), 166-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.042
Xu, Zhenbo, et al. "Development and application of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays on rapid detection of various types of staphylococci strains." Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.) vol. 47,2 (2012): 166-173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.042
Xu Z, Li L, Chu J, Peters BM, Harris ML, Li B, Shi L, Shirtliff ME. Development and application of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays on rapid detection of various types of staphylococci strains. Food Res Int. 2012 Jul 01;47(2):166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.042. PMID: 22778501; PMCID: PMC3390935.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Food Res Int. 2012 Jul 01;47(2):166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.042.

Development and application of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays on rapid detection of various types of staphylococci strains.

Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)

Zhenbo Xu, Lin Li, Jin Chu, Brian M Peters, Megan L Harris, Bing Li, Lei Shi, Mark E Shirtliff

Affiliations

  1. College of Light Industry and Food Sciences, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.

PMID: 22778501 PMCID: PMC3390935 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.042

Abstract

A loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method for rapid detection of various Staphylococcus strains and associated antibiotic resistance determinant had been developed and evaluated in this study. Six primers, including outer primers, inner primers and loop primers, were specially designed for recognizing eight distinct sequences on three targets: 16SrRNA, femA and mecA.. Forty-one reference strains, including various species of gram-negative and -positive isolates, were included in this study to evaluate and optimize LAMP assays. The optimal reaction condition was found to be 65 °C for 45 min, with detection limits at 100 fg DNA/tube and 10 CFU/reaction for 16S rRNA, 100 fg DNA/tube and 10 CFU/reaction for femA, 1 pg DNA/tube and 100 CFU/reaction for mecA, respectively. Application of LAMP assays were performed on 118 various types of Staphylococcus isolates, the detection rate of LAMP assays for the 16SrRNA, femA and mecA was 100% (118/118), 98.5% (64/65) and 94.3% (66/70), and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 100%, 98.1% and 92.3% respectively; with a 100% positive predictive value (PPV) for all three targets. In conclusion, LAMP assays were demonstrated to be useful and powerful tools for rapid detection of various Staphylococcus strains, and undoubtedly, the rapidness, technical simplicity, and cost-effectiveness of LAMP assays will demonstrate broad application for bacteriological detection of food-borne Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus (MRS) isolates.

References

  1. Curr Microbiol. 2008 Sep;57(3):264-8 - PubMed
  2. Vet Microbiol. 2008 Apr 30;128(3-4):298-303 - PubMed
  3. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002 Jan;8(1):82-4 - PubMed
  4. Mol Biol Rep. 2010 Jun;37(5):2183-8 - PubMed
  5. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jul;30(7):1654-60 - PubMed
  6. J Food Prot. 1999 Oct;62(10):1150-6 - PubMed
  7. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007 Oct;13(10):980-4 - PubMed
  8. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Jan;47(1):230-4 - PubMed
  9. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Aug 31;134(1-2):52-6 - PubMed
  10. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Nov;68(3):315-7 - PubMed
  11. J Food Prot. 2006 Mar;69(3):508-15 - PubMed
  12. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(5):877-82 - PubMed
  13. J Infect Chemother. 2007 Jun;13(3):134-40 - PubMed
  14. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003 Mar;45(3):183-9 - PubMed
  15. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Jul;67(7):3122-6 - PubMed
  16. J Infect Chemother. 2009 Apr;15(2):62-9 - PubMed
  17. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997 Jan 15;146(2):271-8 - PubMed
  18. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2007 Apr 10;70(3):499-501 - PubMed
  19. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jun 15;28(12):E63 - PubMed
  20. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1992;31(3):177-90 - PubMed
  21. Int J Food Microbiol. 1990 Aug;11(1):1-19 - PubMed
  22. J Appl Microbiol. 2006 Feb;100(2):352-64 - PubMed
  23. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008 Jan;278(2):223-30 - PubMed
  24. Genet Mol Res. 2003 Mar 31;2(1):63-76 - PubMed
  25. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Oct;56(4):624-32 - PubMed
  26. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 May;17(5):714-8 - PubMed
  27. Mol Cell Probes. 2002 Aug;16(4):307-14 - PubMed
  28. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Feb;54(2):566-9 - PubMed
  29. Clin Chem. 2001 Sep;47(9):1742-3 - PubMed
  30. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Nov;42(11):5349-52 - PubMed
  31. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001 Nov 23;289(1):150-4 - PubMed
  32. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 May;33(5):1121-8 - PubMed
  33. Mol Cell Probes. 2002 Jun;16(3):223-9 - PubMed
  34. J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Oct;38(10):3746-9 - PubMed
  35. Vet Microbiol. 2010 Jul 29;144(1-2):166-71 - PubMed
  36. Vet Microbiol. 2006 Apr 16;114(1-2):155-9 - PubMed
  37. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Dec;67(12):5551-7 - PubMed
  38. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Jun;57(6):1793-8 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support