Display options
Cite
Iwamoto T, Nozawa S, Yoshiike M, et al. Semen quality of fertile Japanese men: a cross-sectional population-based study of 792 men. BMJ Open. 2013;3(1)doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002223.
Iwamoto, T., Nozawa, S., Yoshiike, M., Namiki, M., Koh, E., Kanaya, J., Okuyama, A., Matsumiya, K., Tsujimura, A., Komatsu, K., Tsukamoto, T., Itoh, N., Mieno, M. N., Vierula, M., Toppari, J., Skakkebæk, N. E., & Jørgensen, N. (2013). Semen quality of fertile Japanese men: a cross-sectional population-based study of 792 men. BMJ open, 3(1), . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002223
Iwamoto, Teruaki, et al. "Semen quality of fertile Japanese men: a cross-sectional population-based study of 792 men." BMJ open vol. 3,1 (2013). doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002223
Iwamoto T, Nozawa S, Yoshiike M, Namiki M, Koh E, Kanaya J, Okuyama A, Matsumiya K, Tsujimura A, Komatsu K, Tsukamoto T, Itoh N, Mieno MN, Vierula M, Toppari J, Skakkebæk NE, Jørgensen N. Semen quality of fertile Japanese men: a cross-sectional population-based study of 792 men. BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 25;3(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002223. PMID: 23355656; PMCID: PMC3563117.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 25;3(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002223.

Semen quality of fertile Japanese men: a cross-sectional population-based study of 792 men.

BMJ open

Teruaki Iwamoto, Shiari Nozawa, Miki Yoshiike, Mikio Namiki, Eitetsu Koh, Jiro Kanaya, Akihiko Okuyama, Kiyomi Matsumiya, Akira Tsujimura, Kiyoshi Komatsu, Taiji Tsukamoto, Naoki Itoh, Makiko Naka Mieno, Matti Vierula, Jorma Toppari, Niels E Skakkebæk, Niels Jørgensen

Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.

PMID: 23355656 PMCID: PMC3563117 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002223

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To establish a base line for future studies on temporal trends, to describe potential geographical differences in semen quality and reference values for studies of men from the general population.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of fertile men from four areas in Japan. Inclusion criteria were: age 20-45 years at the time of invitation, and both the man and his mother had to be born in Japan. Additionally, the current pregnancy of the female partner had to be achieved by normal sexual relations without any fertility treatment.

SETTING: Four Japanese study centres at urban areas located in Sapporo, Osaka, Kanazawa and Fukuoka.

PARTICIPANTS: 792 men, median age 31.4 years, included from 1999 to 2002.

OUTCOME MEASURES: Semen volume, sperm concentration, total sperm count, sperm motility and sperm morphology.

RESULTS: Semen volumes, percentages of motile spermatozoa and morphologically normal spermatozoa differed slightly between the four groups, whereas no differences in sperm concentrations or total sperm counts were found. In total, 1.2% of men had a sperm concentration below 5 million/ml, 2.1% below 10 million/ml, 3.5% below 15 million/ml and 16.3% below 40 million/ml. For morphology, 14.7% had less than 5% normal spermatozoa. Reproductive hormone levels varied significantly, however, only little from a biological point of view.

CONCLUSIONS: This is the first cross-sectional study on semen quality covering fertile men from the major regions of Japan. It showed that semen quality of fertile Japanese men is comparable to that of the best in European regions. The results may serve as reference values for studies of men from the general population.

References

  1. Hum Reprod. 2006 Mar;21(3):760-5 - PubMed
  2. Int J Fertil. 1989 Nov-Dec;34(6):401-4 - PubMed
  3. J Androl. 2007 Jan-Feb;28(1):1-4 - PubMed
  4. Int J Androl. 2008 Apr;31(2):93-102 - PubMed
  5. Hum Reprod. 1996 Sep;11(9):1936-41 - PubMed
  6. N Engl J Med. 1995 Feb 2;332(5):281-5 - PubMed
  7. Fertil Steril. 1981 Dec;36(6):766-70 - PubMed
  8. Int J Androl. 1986 Jun;9(3):170-80 - PubMed
  9. Hum Reprod. 1990 Jul;5(5):586-92 - PubMed
  10. Int J Androl. 1996 Feb;19(1):11-7 - PubMed
  11. Int J Androl. 1997 Aug;20(4):201-8 - PubMed
  12. Int J Androl. 2001 Apr;24(2):120-4 - PubMed
  13. BMJ. 1993 Jun 12;306(6892):1579 - PubMed
  14. Hum Reprod. 1998 Dec;13(12):3394-8 - PubMed
  15. Hum Reprod. 2001 May;16(5):1012-9 - PubMed
  16. Fertil Steril. 1996 May;65(5):1009-14 - PubMed
  17. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997 Jul;14(6):347-53 - PubMed
  18. Hum Reprod Update. 2010 May-Jun;16(3):231-45 - PubMed
  19. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991 Jun;72(6):1242-8 - PubMed
  20. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998 Jun;83(6):2104-9 - PubMed
  21. J Androl. 1998 May-Jun;19(3):348-57 - PubMed
  22. Int J Androl. 1985 Aug;8(4):257-74 - PubMed
  23. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Apr;111(4):414-20 - PubMed
  24. Hum Reprod. 1988 May;3(4):445-9 - PubMed
  25. Reprod Med Biol. 2007 Nov 07;6(4):185-193 - PubMed
  26. Int J Androl. 2012 Feb;35(1):1-10 - PubMed
  27. Hum Reprod. 2002 Aug;17(8):2199-208 - PubMed
  28. Reprod Contracept. 1999 Mar;10(1):33-9 - PubMed
  29. BMJ. 1996 Feb 24;312(7029):471-2 - PubMed
  30. Lancet. 1994 Jan 22;343(8891):230 - PubMed
  31. BMJ. 1996 Feb 24;312(7029):467-71 - PubMed
  32. Hum Reprod. 1996 Feb;11(2):325-9 - PubMed
  33. Fertil Steril. 1997 Dec;68(6):1059-64 - PubMed
  34. Cancer Res. 1995 May 1;55(9):1937-40 - PubMed
  35. Fertil Steril. 1998 Jul;70(1):76-80 - PubMed
  36. Int J Androl. 2011 Aug;34(4 Pt 2):e37-48 - PubMed
  37. Nature. 1986 Apr 10-16;320(6062):488-9 - PubMed
  38. BMJ. 1992 Sep 12;305(6854):609-13 - PubMed
  39. Lancet. 1992 Apr 11;339(8798):887-9 - PubMed
  40. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Oct;84(10):3666-72 - PubMed
  41. Minerva Ginecol. 1999 Jun;51(6):223-31 - PubMed

Publication Types