Display options
Cite
Lambe P, Waters C, Bristow D. Do differentials in the support and advice available at UK schools and colleges influence candidate performance in the medical school admissions interview? A survey of direct school leaver applicants to a UK medical school. Med Teach. 2013;35(9):731-9doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.801941.
Lambe, P., Waters, C., & Bristow, D. (2013). Do differentials in the support and advice available at UK schools and colleges influence candidate performance in the medical school admissions interview? A survey of direct school leaver applicants to a UK medical school. Medical teacher, 35(9), 731-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.801941
Lambe, Paul, et al. "Do differentials in the support and advice available at UK schools and colleges influence candidate performance in the medical school admissions interview? A survey of direct school leaver applicants to a UK medical school." Medical teacher vol. 35,9 (2013): 731-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.801941
Lambe P, Waters C, Bristow D. Do differentials in the support and advice available at UK schools and colleges influence candidate performance in the medical school admissions interview? A survey of direct school leaver applicants to a UK medical school. Med Teach. 2013 Sep;35(9):731-9. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.801941. Epub 2013 Jun 24. PMID: 23795943.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Med Teach. 2013 Sep;35(9):731-9. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.801941. Epub 2013 Jun 24.

Do differentials in the support and advice available at UK schools and colleges influence candidate performance in the medical school admissions interview? A survey of direct school leaver applicants to a UK medical school.

Medical teacher

Paul Lambe, Catherine Waters, David Bristow

Affiliations

  1. Plymouth University, UK.

PMID: 23795943 DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.801941

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, nothing is known about whether differentials in support and advice during preparation for the interview influence candidate performance and thereby contribute to bias in selection for medical school.

AIM: To assess if differences in advice and support with preparation for the medical school admissions interview given type of school last attended influence interview score achieved by direct school leaver applicants to study on an undergraduate UK medical degree course.

METHODS: Confidential self-completed on-line questionnaire survey.

RESULTS: Interview performance was positively related to whether a teacher, tutor or career advisors at the School or College last attended had advised a respondent to prepare for the interview, had advised about the various styles of medical interview used and the types of questions asked, and what resources were available to help in preparation. Respondents from Private/Independent schools were more likely than those from State schools to have received such advice and support.

CONCLUSIONS: Differentials in access to advice on and support with preparation for the medical school interview may advantage some candidates over others. This inequity would likely be ameliorated by the provision of an authoritative and comprehensive guide to applying to medical school outlining admission requirements and the preparation strategy applicants should use in order to best meet those requirements. The guide could be disseminated to the Principals of all UK schools and colleges and freely available electronic versions signposted in medical school prospectuses and the course descriptor on the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service.

MeSH terms

Publication Types