Exp Clin Cardiol. 2013;18(1):17-21.

Percutaneous coronary intervention delays pacemaker implantation in coronary artery disease patients with established bradyarrhythmias.

Experimental and clinical cardiology

Lihua Zhong, Yanhui Gao, Hongyuan Xia, Xueqi Li, Shipeng Wei

PMID: 24294031 PMCID: PMC3716496

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pacemakers have long been used to assist the heart under pathological conditions, and they are the first choice in the treatment of systematic bradyarrhythmias. However, the effect of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary artery disease as well as bradyarrhythmias remains unknown.

METHODS: In the present study, 42 patients with chest pain and/or abnormal stress test results were surveyed. Before coronary angiography, patients underwent complete examination, including a 24 h dynamic electrocardiogram, which was used to diagnose bradyarrhythmias that were not suitable for pacemaker implantation due to a lack of arrhythmia-related symptoms. All patients underwent PCI but did not undergo pacemaker implantation. Forty-one patients with chest pain and/or abnormal stress test results, as well as symptom-free bradyarrhythmias, were selected as the control group. All of the patients in the control group were committed to treatments without PCI.

RESULTS: During a mean (±SD) of 3.3±0.5 years of follow-up (range 2.5 to 4.5 years), 24 of 42 patients who received PCI underwent pacemaker implantation for arrhythmia-related symptoms, eight were shown by Holter monitoring to have worsened but still exhibited no symptoms, and the remainder did not show any changes according to the examinations performed. In the control group, 31 patients underwent pacemaker implantation for arrhythmia-related symptoms, eight were shown by Holter monitoring to have worsened but still exhibited no symptoms, and two did not show any changes according to the examinations performed. Nevertheless, the rates of pacemaker implantation each year (from the first to the third year) between the two groups were 7.1% versus 39.0% (P=0.001); 33.3% versus 63.4% (P=0.006); and 57.1% versus 75.6%, (P=0.075), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: The present study found that PCI delayed the demand for pacemaker implantation among coronary artery disease patients.

Keywords: Pacemaker; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Sinus node diseases

References

1. Clin Cardiol. 2008 Oct;31(10):498-501 - PubMed
2. Am J Cardiol. 1983 Apr;51(7):1098-102 - PubMed
3. Circulation. 1973 Feb;47(2):408-19 - PubMed
4. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2003 Sep;18(5):394-9 - PubMed
5. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2011 Oct;12(10):709-13 - PubMed
6. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1997 Sep;18(3):282-4 - PubMed
7. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2002 Dec;2(4):279-83 - PubMed
8. Br Heart J. 1994 Aug;72(2):190-1 - PubMed
9. Circulation. 1997 Aug 5;96(3):809-15 - PubMed
10. Circulation. 1971 Jun;43(6):977-9 - PubMed
11. Heart Surg Forum. 2010 Feb;13(1):E45-8 - PubMed
12. Transplantation. 2003 Jul 15;76(1):137-42 - PubMed
13. Can J Cardiol. 2006 Oct;22(12):1047-52 - PubMed
14. Chest. 1977 Oct;72(4):492-4 - PubMed
15. Int Heart J. 2008 Sep;49(5):525-31 - PubMed
16. Circulation. 2008 May 27;117(21):e350-408 - PubMed
17. Circulation. 1993 Dec;88(6):2987-3007 - PubMed
18. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2009 May-Jun;50(3):179-84 - PubMed
19. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1998 Aug;16(3):583-600, viii - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article